An open-label randomized controlled trial of DMARD withdrawal in RA patients achieving therapeutic response with certolizumab pegol combined with DMARDs.
Adult
Aged
Antirheumatic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
/ drug therapy
Certolizumab Pegol
/ therapeutic use
Deprescriptions
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Humans
Hydroxychloroquine
/ therapeutic use
Leflunomide
/ therapeutic use
Male
Methotrexate
/ therapeutic use
Middle Aged
Sulfasalazine
/ therapeutic use
Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
DMARD
TNF
biologics
certolizumab pegol
observational
real-world
rheumatoid arthritis
Journal
Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1462-0332
Titre abrégé: Rheumatology (Oxford)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2020
01 07 2020
Historique:
received:
02
05
2019
revised:
09
09
2019
pubmed:
20
10
2019
medline:
6
10
2020
entrez:
20
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this trial was to compare effectiveness of certolizumab pegol added to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) in RA patients, followed by continuing vs discontinuing background csDMARDs after treatment response. Patients with active RA who had certolizumab pegol added to their existing csDMARD regimen due to inadequate response were eligible. At 3 or 6 months, patients who achieved a change (Δ) in DAS28 of ⩾1.2 were randomized to continue combination therapy (COMBO) or withdraw csDMARD therapy (MONO) (unblinded). The primary outcome was non-inferiority of stopping vs continuing csDMARD(s) in terms of maintaining ΔDAS28 ⩾ 1.2 or achieving DAS28 low disease activity at 18 months (non-inferiority margin: 15 percentile units). A total of 125 patients were enrolled, 88 randomized to COMBO (n = 43) or MONO (n = 45). No significant differences were observed between groups in baseline age, gender, race, RF status or prior biologics (16% vs 11%). Although the rate of ΔDAS28 ⩾ 1.2 and/or DAS28 low disease activity achievement at 18 months was clinically comparable between the two groups (72% vs 69%), non-inferiority assumptions were not met [absolute risk difference (upper limit of 90% CI): 2.6% (19.1%)]. Similar baseline-adjusted improvements were seen in DAS28 (COMBO vs MONO: -2.3 vs -2.1; P = 0.49) and all endpoints were not statistically different including 59% vs 56% achieved DAS28 low disease activity, 69% vs 59% ΔDAS28 ⩾ 1.2, and 41% each remission. Among RA patients achieving a therapeutic response on combination therapy with certolizumab pegol and csDMARDs, withdrawing csDMARDs was not non-inferior to maintaining csDMARDs but improvements were sustained in both groups at 18 months.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31628486
pii: 5598424
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez470
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
0
Sulfasalazine
3XC8GUZ6CB
Hydroxychloroquine
4QWG6N8QKH
Leflunomide
G162GK9U4W
Certolizumab Pegol
UMD07X179E
Methotrexate
YL5FZ2Y5U1
Types de publication
Equivalence Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1522-1528Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.