Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations.


Journal

Minerva stomatologica
ISSN: 1827-174X
Titre abrégé: Minerva Stomatol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0421071

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 22 10 2019
medline: 23 9 2020
entrez: 22 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Finishing and polishing procedures play a crucial role to achieve the best aesthetic result of direct restorations. Many manufacturers to the clinicians offer different finishing and polishing systems. This study aims to examine the behavior of four different finishing and polishing systems on the roughness, gloss and morphology surface of one resin composite. Twelve Filtek XTE Supreme (3M ESPE) discs were prepared and divided into 4 groups (N.=3), depending on the different finishing and polishing systems: Group 1 (GP1) Sof-Lex Extra-Thin XT discs; Group 2 (GP2) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals; Group 3 (GP3) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals, Diamond Twist SCL; Group 4 (GP4) with Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur and Occlubrush. The roughness and gloss were evaluated and then samples examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) to analyse the morphology after finishing and polishing. Regarding the surface roughness, GP1 and GP2 showed similar values for Ra, Ry, Rz and Rq parameters; while GP3 displayed the lowest values in all parameters; GP4 had the highest Ra value. Regarding the gloss, the values decreased as follows: GP3>GP2=GP4>GP1 (P<0.05). Scanning electron micrographs showed the abrasion of the samples with an increase in the surface roughness in GP1 and GP4. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's Test was used for statistical evaluations (P<0.05). The roughness and gloss surface of resin composites depend on the finishing and polishing systems used. This study demonstrates that satisfactory gloss outcomes are obtained using a system based on diamond paste.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Finishing and polishing procedures play a crucial role to achieve the best aesthetic result of direct restorations. Many manufacturers to the clinicians offer different finishing and polishing systems. This study aims to examine the behavior of four different finishing and polishing systems on the roughness, gloss and morphology surface of one resin composite.
METHODS METHODS
Twelve Filtek XTE Supreme (3M ESPE) discs were prepared and divided into 4 groups (N.=3), depending on the different finishing and polishing systems: Group 1 (GP1) Sof-Lex Extra-Thin XT discs; Group 2 (GP2) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals; Group 3 (GP3) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals, Diamond Twist SCL; Group 4 (GP4) with Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur and Occlubrush. The roughness and gloss were evaluated and then samples examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) to analyse the morphology after finishing and polishing.
RESULTS RESULTS
Regarding the surface roughness, GP1 and GP2 showed similar values for Ra, Ry, Rz and Rq parameters; while GP3 displayed the lowest values in all parameters; GP4 had the highest Ra value. Regarding the gloss, the values decreased as follows: GP3>GP2=GP4>GP1 (P<0.05). Scanning electron micrographs showed the abrasion of the samples with an increase in the surface roughness in GP1 and GP4. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's Test was used for statistical evaluations (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The roughness and gloss surface of resin composites depend on the finishing and polishing systems used. This study demonstrates that satisfactory gloss outcomes are obtained using a system based on diamond paste.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31633320
pii: S0026-4970.19.04310-3
doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04310-3
doi:

Substances chimiques

Composite Resins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

207-214

Auteurs

Vincenzo Tosco (V)

Department of Clinical Science and Stomatology, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy - v.tosco@pm.univpm.it.

Riccardo Monterubbianesi (R)

Department of Clinical Science and Stomatology, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Giulia Orilisi (G)

Department of Clinical Science and Stomatology, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Maurizio Procaccini (M)

Department of Clinical Science and Stomatology, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Simone Grandini (S)

Department of Medical Biotechnology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

Angelo Putignano (A)

Department of Clinical Science and Stomatology, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Giovanna Orsini (G)

Department of Clinical Science and Stomatology, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Articles similaires

Hemiarthroplasty in young patients.

Hazimah Mahmud, Dong Wang, Andra Topan-Rat et al.
1.00
Humans Male Hemiarthroplasty Middle Aged Aged
Silicon Dioxide Water Hot Temperature Compressive Strength X-Ray Diffraction
Nitriles Tensile Strength Materials Testing Gloves, Protective Product Packaging
Calcium Carbonate Sand Powders Construction Materials Materials Testing

Classifications MeSH