Basic Properties of a New Polymer Gel for 3D-Dosimetry at High Dose-Rates Typical for FFF Irradiation Based on Dithiothreitol and Methacrylic Acid (MAGADIT): Sensitivity, Range, Reproducibility, Accuracy, Dose Rate Effect and Impact of Oxygen Scavenger.

3D FFF dose rate dosimetry flattening filter free gel magnetic resonance oxygen scavenger polymer precision radiation therapy responsive gels in biomedical and diagnostic applications

Journal

Polymers
ISSN: 2073-4360
Titre abrégé: Polymers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 29 08 2019
revised: 27 09 2019
accepted: 10 10 2019
entrez: 23 10 2019
pubmed: 23 10 2019
medline: 23 10 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The photon induced radical-initiated polymerization in polymer gels can be used for high-resolution tissue equivalent dosimeters in quality control of radiation therapy. The dose (D) distribution in radiation therapy can be measured as a change of the physical measurement parameter T2 using T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. The detection by T2 is relying on the local change of the molecular mobility due to local polymerization initiated by radicals generated by the ionizing radiation. The dosimetric signals R2 = 1/T2 of many of the current polymer gels are dose-rate dependent, which reduces the reliability of the gel for clinical use. A novel gel dosimeter, based on methacrylic acid, gelatin and the newly added dithiothreitol (MAGADIT) as an oxygen-scavenger was analyzed for basic properties, such as sensitivity, reproducibility, accuracy and dose-rate dependence. Dithiothreitol features no toxic classification with a difference to THPC and offers a stronger negative redox-potential than ascorbic acid. Polymer gels with three different concentration levels of dithiothreitol were irradiated with a preclinical research X-ray unit and MR-scanned (T2) for quantitative dosimetry after calibration. The polymer gel with the lowest concentration of the oxygen scavenger was about factor 3 more sensitive to dose as compared to the gel with the highest concentration. The dose sensitivity (α = ∆R2/∆D) of MAGADIT gels was significantly dependent on the applied dose rate D ˙ (≈48% reduction between D ˙ = 0.6 Gy/min and D ˙ = 4 Gy/min). However, this undesirable dose-rate effect reduced between 4-8 Gy/min (≈23%) and almost disappeared in the high dose-rate range (8 ≤   D ˙ ≤   12 Gy/min) used in flattening-filter-free (FFF) irradiations. The dose response varied for different samples within one manufacturing batch within 3%-6% (reproducibility). The accuracy ranged between 3.5% and 7.9%. The impact of the dose rate on the spatial integrity is demonstrated in the example of a linear accelerator (LINAC) small sized 5 × 10 mm

Identifiants

pubmed: 31635117
pii: polym11101717
doi: 10.3390/polym11101717
pmc: PMC6835276
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Hochschuljubilaeumsfonds of the City of Vienna/Austria
ID : H-1208/2003
Organisme : Higher education commision HEC Pakistan
ID : Muzafar Khan 2013

Références

Phys Med Biol. 2010 Mar 7;55(5):R1-63
pubmed: 20150687
Phys Med Biol. 2009 Nov 21;54(22):6773-89
pubmed: 19847016
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Oct 7;49(19):4507-22
pubmed: 15552414
Med Phys. 2001 May;28(5):833-43
pubmed: 11393479
Oral Oncol. 2010 Apr;46(4):283-6
pubmed: 20188620
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Jan 7;58(1):19-42
pubmed: 23221300
Phys Med Biol. 2001 Aug;46(8):2143-59
pubmed: 11512616
Med Phys. 2007 Apr;34(4):1286-97
pubmed: 17500460
Phys Med Biol. 1994 Sep;39(9):1437-55
pubmed: 15552115
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 May 06;14(3):4126
pubmed: 23652246
Biochemistry. 1964 Apr;3:480-2
pubmed: 14192894
Free Radic Biol Med. 2014 Apr;69:318-23
pubmed: 24509159
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006;120(1-4):107-12
pubmed: 16782984
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Aug 7;52(15):4697-706
pubmed: 17634658
Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2006 Jan;2(1):e19
pubmed: 21614217
Br J Radiol. 1999 Nov;72(863):1085-92
pubmed: 10700826
J Med Phys. 2011 Jan;36(1):3-14
pubmed: 21430853
Br J Radiol. 2005 Jul;78(931):623-30
pubmed: 15961844
Phys Med. 2016 Sep;32(9):1156-61
pubmed: 27542576
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jul 7;51(13):R363-79
pubmed: 16790913
Med Phys. 2006 Jul;33(7):2506-18
pubmed: 16898454
Z Med Phys. 2014 May;24(2):153-63
pubmed: 24055395
Phys Med. 2019 Jan;57:72-79
pubmed: 30738535
World J Radiol. 2017 Mar 28;9(3):112-125
pubmed: 28396725
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jun 7;60(11):4399-411
pubmed: 25985293
Med Phys. 2008 May;35(5):1756-69
pubmed: 18561650
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Feb 7;62(3):986-1008
pubmed: 28081000
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Jan 31;64(3):035019
pubmed: 30577036
Phys Med Biol. 2001 Nov;46(11):2801-25
pubmed: 11720348
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Feb 21;60(4):1543-63
pubmed: 25615261
Health Phys. 2008 Nov;95(5):666-76
pubmed: 18849701
Phys Med Biol. 1996 Dec;41(12):2695-704
pubmed: 8971963
Med Phys. 2011 Mar;38(3):1280-93
pubmed: 21520840
Phys Med Biol. 1999 Oct;44(10):2677-84
pubmed: 10533935
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Mar 12;63(6):06NT01
pubmed: 29528035
Med Phys. 2011 Dec;38(12):6754-62
pubmed: 22149857
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Sep 7;49(17):4087-108
pubmed: 15470925
Radiother Oncol. 1998 Sep;48(3):283-91
pubmed: 9925248
Phys Med Biol. 1984 Oct;29(10):1189-97
pubmed: 6494247
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Feb 7;51(3):653-73
pubmed: 16424587
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 17;10(12):e0145255
pubmed: 26678918
Phys Med Biol. 2001 Dec;46(12):3105-13
pubmed: 11768494
Phys Med Biol. 1998 Mar;43(3):695-702
pubmed: 9533146
Med Phys. 2001 Nov;28(11):2370-8
pubmed: 11764045
Phys Med Biol. 2000 Apr;45(4):859-78
pubmed: 10795977
Med Phys. 2011 Aug;38(8):4846-57
pubmed: 21928656
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Apr 1;49(5):1451-60
pubmed: 11286853
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jul 21;51(14):3301-14
pubmed: 16825731
Phys Med Biol. 2009 Nov 21;54(22):6791-808
pubmed: 19847015
Phys Med Biol. 2002 Oct 7;47(19):3441-63
pubmed: 12408474
Radiother Oncol. 2000 Jun;55(3):241-9
pubmed: 10869739
Oncologist. 1999;4(6):433-42
pubmed: 10631687
Appl Radiat Isot. 2010 Jan;68(1):144-54
pubmed: 19775899
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 May 1;53(1):12-22
pubmed: 12007936
Z Med Phys. 2014 Dec;24(4):363-72
pubmed: 25270978

Auteurs

Muzafar Khan (M)

Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-23, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. mohmand169@yahoo.com.
High-Field MR-Center (MRCE), Medical University of Vienna; Lazarettg 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. mohmand169@yahoo.com.
Nuclear Medicine, Oncology and Radiotherapy Institute (NORI), G-8/3 Islamabad 44000, Pakistan. mohmand169@yahoo.com.

Gerd Heilemann (G)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. gerd.heilemann@meduniwien.ac.at.

Wolfgang Lechner (W)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. wolfgang.lechner@akhwien.at.

Dietmar Georg (D)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. dietmar.georg@meduniwien.ac.at.

Andreas Georg Berg (AG)

Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-23, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. andreas.berg@meduniwien.ac.at.
High-Field MR-Center (MRCE), Medical University of Vienna; Lazarettg 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. andreas.berg@meduniwien.ac.at.

Classifications MeSH