Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.

Humans Pancreatic Neoplasms / psychology Patient Reported Outcome Measures Predictive Value of Tests Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results

Journal

HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association
ISSN: 1477-2574
Titre abrégé: HPB (Oxford)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100900921

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2020
Historique:
received: 01 11 2018
accepted: 02 09 2019
pubmed: 23 10 2019
medline: 9 7 2021
entrez: 23 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of this systematic review is to examine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), their attributes and application in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). A systematic literature search was undertaken of articles published to June 2018 to identify PROMs applied in primary studies in PC. Characteristics of the included studies and PROMs were described with identified scales grouped into five domains. The psychometric properties of the identified PROMs were further assessed for reliability and validity among patients with PC. From 1688 studies screened, 170 were included. Almost half (48%) were conducted in patients with unresectable PC; the majority of these (68%) were evaluated in randomized controlled trials. Median questionnaire completion rates fell below 10% of the original cohort within 12 months in patients with unresectable PC compared to 75% in patients with resectable PC. Seventy PROMs were identified, 32 measuring unidimensional parameters (e.g. pain) and 35 measuring multidimensional (e.g. quality of life) constructs. Only five (7%) PROMs were disease-specific and 13 (19%) were validated in patients with PC. Fifty scales were grouped into 19 physical, 9 psychological, 6 psychiatric, 9 social and 7 other domains. Three multidimensional PROMs, the: (i) FACT-HEP in unresectable PC; (ii) QLQ-PAN26 (in conjunction with its core QLQ-C30 PROM) in resectable PC; and (iii) MDASI-GI are recommended as instruments to capture quality of life in patients with PC. Summarised scales and psychometric evaluation provide a framework to choose PROMs for scales not captured by the recommended PROMs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The aim of this systematic review is to examine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), their attributes and application in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC).
METHOD
A systematic literature search was undertaken of articles published to June 2018 to identify PROMs applied in primary studies in PC. Characteristics of the included studies and PROMs were described with identified scales grouped into five domains. The psychometric properties of the identified PROMs were further assessed for reliability and validity among patients with PC.
RESULTS
From 1688 studies screened, 170 were included. Almost half (48%) were conducted in patients with unresectable PC; the majority of these (68%) were evaluated in randomized controlled trials. Median questionnaire completion rates fell below 10% of the original cohort within 12 months in patients with unresectable PC compared to 75% in patients with resectable PC. Seventy PROMs were identified, 32 measuring unidimensional parameters (e.g. pain) and 35 measuring multidimensional (e.g. quality of life) constructs. Only five (7%) PROMs were disease-specific and 13 (19%) were validated in patients with PC. Fifty scales were grouped into 19 physical, 9 psychological, 6 psychiatric, 9 social and 7 other domains.
CONCLUSION
Three multidimensional PROMs, the: (i) FACT-HEP in unresectable PC; (ii) QLQ-PAN26 (in conjunction with its core QLQ-C30 PROM) in resectable PC; and (iii) MDASI-GI are recommended as instruments to capture quality of life in patients with PC. Summarised scales and psychometric evaluation provide a framework to choose PROMs for scales not captured by the recommended PROMs.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.09.002 PMID: 31635959
pubmed: 31635959
pii: S1365-182X(19)30711-7
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.09.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

187-203

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ashika D Maharaj (AD)

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Stella Samoborec (S)

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Sue M Evans (SM)

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

John Zalcberg (J)

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Rachel E Neale (RE)

QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

David Goldstein (D)

University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Neil Merrett (N)

Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.

Kate White (K)

University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Daniel Croagh (D)

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC, Australia.

Charles H C Pilgrim (CHC)

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Peninsula Private Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Cabrini Health, Malvern, VIC, Australia; Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia.

Peter Evans (P)

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Cabrini Health, Malvern, VIC, Australia.

Brett Knowles (B)

Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Trevor Leong (T)

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Jennifer Philip (J)

Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Marty Smith (M)

Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Cabrini Health, Malvern, VIC, Australia.

Liane Ioannou (L)

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: liane.ioannou@monash.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female

Evaluation of Low-Value Services Across Major Medicare Advantage Insurers and Traditional Medicare.

Ciara Duggan, Adam L Beckman, Ishani Ganguli et al.
1.00
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Effectiveness of Virtual Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Hallie Tankha, Devyn Gaskins, Amanda Shallcross et al.
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH

questionsmedicales.fr › Eucaryotes › Animaux › Chordés › Vertébrés › Mammifères › Eutheria › Primates › Haplorhini › Catarrhini › Hominidae › Humains › Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in...
questionsmedicales.fr › Maladies endocriniennes › Tumeurs des glandes endocrines › Tumeurs du pancréas › Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in...
questionsmedicales.fr › Environnement et santé publique › Santé publique › Méthodes épidémiologiques › Collecte de données › Enquêtes et questionnaires › Enquêtes sur les soins de santé › Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients › Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in...
questionsmedicales.fr › Environnement et santé publique › Santé publique › Méthodes épidémiologiques › Méthodologie en recherche épidémiologique › Valeur prédictive des tests › Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in...
questionsmedicales.fr › Disciplines et activités comportementales › Tests psychologiques › Psychométrie › Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in...
questionsmedicales.fr › Environnement et santé publique › Santé publique › Méthodes épidémiologiques › Méthodologie en recherche épidémiologique › Reproductibilité des résultats › Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in...