De Novo Isolation & Affinity Maturation of yeast-displayed Virion-binding human fibronectin domains by flow cytometric screening against Virions.

AIDS Flow cytometry Human Immunodeficiency Virus Zika virus antibody engineering directed evolution fibronectin phage display protein engineering yeast display

Journal

Journal of biological engineering
ISSN: 1754-1611
Titre abrégé: J Biol Eng
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101306640

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 19 06 2019
accepted: 04 09 2019
entrez: 23 10 2019
pubmed: 23 10 2019
medline: 23 10 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The promise of biopharmaceuticals comprising one or more binding domains motivates the development of novel methods for de novo isolation and affinity maturation of virion-binding domains. Identifying avenues for overcoming the challenges associated with using virions as screening reagents is paramount given the difficulties associated with obtaining high-purity virus-associated proteins that retain the conformation exhibited on the virion surface. Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) of 1.5 × 10 FACS of a yeast-displayed binding domain library is an efficient method for de novo isolation of virion-binding domains. Affinities of isolated virion-binding clones are readily enhanced via FACS screening of mutant progeny libraries. Given that most binding domains are compatible with yeast display, the approach taken in this work may be broadly utilized for generating virion-binding domains against many different viruses for use in passive immunotherapy and the prevention of viral infection.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The promise of biopharmaceuticals comprising one or more binding domains motivates the development of novel methods for de novo isolation and affinity maturation of virion-binding domains. Identifying avenues for overcoming the challenges associated with using virions as screening reagents is paramount given the difficulties associated with obtaining high-purity virus-associated proteins that retain the conformation exhibited on the virion surface.
RESULTS RESULTS
Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) of 1.5 × 10
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
FACS of a yeast-displayed binding domain library is an efficient method for de novo isolation of virion-binding domains. Affinities of isolated virion-binding clones are readily enhanced via FACS screening of mutant progeny libraries. Given that most binding domains are compatible with yeast display, the approach taken in this work may be broadly utilized for generating virion-binding domains against many different viruses for use in passive immunotherapy and the prevention of viral infection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31636701
doi: 10.1186/s13036-019-0203-2
pii: 203
pmc: PMC6796422
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

76

Subventions

Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : DP2 AI136600
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s). 2019.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

MAbs. 2014 May-Jun;6(3):718-27
pubmed: 24518197
Protein Eng Des Sel. 2015 Mar;28(3):67-78
pubmed: 25691761
BMC Med. 2018 Oct 18;16(1):195
pubmed: 30336778
J Chromatogr A. 2010 May 21;1217(21):3489-93
pubmed: 20371065
Nat Biotechnol. 2003 Feb;21(2):163-70
pubmed: 12536217
J Virol Methods. 2014 Sep 1;205:61-7
pubmed: 24747010
J Biol Chem. 2011 Dec 2;286(48):41273-85
pubmed: 21979953
J Immunol Methods. 2006 Jul 31;314(1-2):30-7
pubmed: 16822520
J Vis Exp. 2011 Jul 09;(53):e3168
pubmed: 21775958
Protein Eng Des Sel. 2014 Oct;27(10):419-29
pubmed: 24786107
Cytometry A. 2010 May;77(5):410-9
pubmed: 20099249
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005 May 20;90(4):391-404
pubmed: 15812800
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Oct 25;12(10):e0006811
pubmed: 30359380
Anal Biochem. 2006 Oct 15;357(2):289-98
pubmed: 16962548
Protein Eng Des Sel. 2012 Mar;25(3):107-17
pubmed: 22240293
Protein Eng Des Sel. 2014 Oct;27(10):411-8
pubmed: 24996411
Int J Lab Hematol. 2017 May;39 Suppl 1:76-85
pubmed: 28447425
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2018 Mar;25(3):289-296
pubmed: 29434346
J Virol Methods. 2013 Dec;194(1-2):178-84
pubmed: 23994147
Science. 2018 Nov 2;362(6414):598-602
pubmed: 30385580
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Nov 12;12(11):e0006880
pubmed: 30418969
Methods Enzymol. 2013;523:303-26
pubmed: 23422436
J Virol. 2016 Dec 16;91(1):
pubmed: 27795432
Viruses. 2015 Nov 12;7(11):5875-88
pubmed: 26569291
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(2):755-68
pubmed: 17406305
J Am Chem Soc. 2009 Mar 25;131(11):3794-5
pubmed: 19292479
Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2009 Jun;Chapter 26:Unit 26.5
pubmed: 19499507
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0138956
pubmed: 26383268
J Virol Methods. 2011 Jun;174(1-2):131-5
pubmed: 21440004
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Feb;31(2):166-9
pubmed: 23334449
Proteins. 2014 Jul;82(7):1359-69
pubmed: 24375666
Science. 2017 Oct 6;358(6359):85-90
pubmed: 28931639
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016 Oct 26;80(4):989-1010
pubmed: 27784796

Auteurs

Pete Heinzelman (P)

1Department of Microbial Pathogenesis & Immunology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 USA.

Alyssa Low (A)

1Department of Microbial Pathogenesis & Immunology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 USA.

Rudo Simeon (R)

1Department of Microbial Pathogenesis & Immunology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 USA.

Gus A Wright (GA)

2Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 USA.

Zhilei Chen (Z)

1Department of Microbial Pathogenesis & Immunology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 USA.

Classifications MeSH