Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Fellow's Stitch Using "Fisherman's Knot" Technique to Achieve Large Caliber (> 10 French) Venous Hemostasis.

Fellow’s stitch Figure of Z Fisherman’s knot Venous hemostasis

Journal

Cardiology research
ISSN: 1923-2829
Titre abrégé: Cardiol Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101557543

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 14 08 2019
accepted: 31 08 2019
entrez: 23 10 2019
pubmed: 23 10 2019
medline: 23 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Among patients undergoing intervention involving venous access, various techniques have been implemented to achieve hemostasis in order to reduce local access site complications, to decrease length of stay and to facilitate early ambulation. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of fellow's stitch using "fisherman's knot" (figure of Z (FoZ)) technique when compared with conventional manual compression for immediate closure of large venous sheath (> 10 French (Fr)). Between November 2012 and March 2019, 949 patients underwent various interventions which involved venous access requiring hemostasis. All the patients were anticoagulated with heparin during the procedure. In a sequential allocation, fellow's stitch using "fisherman's knot" (group I: n = 384) and conventional manual compression (group II: n = 365) were used in achieving hemostasis at right/left femoral venous access site following sheath removal (> 12 Fr). A 0-Vicryl suture was used to make one deep stitch just distal to entry of sheath and one superficial stitch just proximal to entry site, thereby creating an FoZ. A fisherman's knot was then tied, and knot was pushed down while sheath was removed. In cases where immediate hemostasis was not achieved, it was compressed for 2 min to achieve it. The mean age of 949 patients was 13.1 ± 8.2 years where male (n = 574; 65%) outnumbered female (n = 375; 35%). In group I, hemostasis was achieved immediately after tying the knot in 343 (89.3%) patients, while within ≤ 2 min of light pressure in 41 (10.7%) patients. Five (1.3%) patients had failure of stitch as suture snapped during knotting, and hemostasis was achieved by manual compression as per protocol in group I. The median time to hemostasis (1.1 vs. 14.3 min, P < 0.001), ambulation (3.3 vs. 18.9 h, P < 0.01) and hospital stay (24.6 vs. 36.8 h, P < 0.001) was significantly shorter in group I compared to group II. The minor vascular access site complications in form of hematoma (n = 6 (1.6%) vs. n = 1 (0.2%); P < 0.001), and thrombosis at femoral vein (n = 4 (1.1%) vs. n = 0 (0%); P < 0.001) were significantly higher in group II when compared to group I. The differences regarding re-bleeding and formation of arterio-venous fistula between both the groups were statistically insignificant. The fellow's stitch using "fisherman's knot" or "FoZ" suture is a simple, efficacious and safe technique to achieve an immediate hemostasis after removal of larger venous sheath (> 10 Fr).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Among patients undergoing intervention involving venous access, various techniques have been implemented to achieve hemostasis in order to reduce local access site complications, to decrease length of stay and to facilitate early ambulation. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of fellow's stitch using "fisherman's knot" (figure of Z (FoZ)) technique when compared with conventional manual compression for immediate closure of large venous sheath (> 10 French (Fr)).
METHODS METHODS
Between November 2012 and March 2019, 949 patients underwent various interventions which involved venous access requiring hemostasis. All the patients were anticoagulated with heparin during the procedure. In a sequential allocation, fellow's stitch using "fisherman's knot" (group I: n = 384) and conventional manual compression (group II: n = 365) were used in achieving hemostasis at right/left femoral venous access site following sheath removal (> 12 Fr). A 0-Vicryl suture was used to make one deep stitch just distal to entry of sheath and one superficial stitch just proximal to entry site, thereby creating an FoZ. A fisherman's knot was then tied, and knot was pushed down while sheath was removed. In cases where immediate hemostasis was not achieved, it was compressed for 2 min to achieve it.
RESULTS RESULTS
The mean age of 949 patients was 13.1 ± 8.2 years where male (n = 574; 65%) outnumbered female (n = 375; 35%). In group I, hemostasis was achieved immediately after tying the knot in 343 (89.3%) patients, while within ≤ 2 min of light pressure in 41 (10.7%) patients. Five (1.3%) patients had failure of stitch as suture snapped during knotting, and hemostasis was achieved by manual compression as per protocol in group I. The median time to hemostasis (1.1 vs. 14.3 min, P < 0.001), ambulation (3.3 vs. 18.9 h, P < 0.01) and hospital stay (24.6 vs. 36.8 h, P < 0.001) was significantly shorter in group I compared to group II. The minor vascular access site complications in form of hematoma (n = 6 (1.6%) vs. n = 1 (0.2%); P < 0.001), and thrombosis at femoral vein (n = 4 (1.1%) vs. n = 0 (0%); P < 0.001) were significantly higher in group II when compared to group I. The differences regarding re-bleeding and formation of arterio-venous fistula between both the groups were statistically insignificant.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The fellow's stitch using "fisherman's knot" or "FoZ" suture is a simple, efficacious and safe technique to achieve an immediate hemostasis after removal of larger venous sheath (> 10 Fr).

Identifiants

pubmed: 31636798
doi: 10.14740/cr931
pmc: PMC6785297
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

303-308

Informations de copyright

Copyright 2019, Kumar et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None to declare.

Références

EuroIntervention. 2015 Mar;10(11):1346-53
pubmed: 24694560
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002 Oct;57(2):257-65
pubmed: 12357533
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jul 1;78(1):155-60
pubmed: 21681904
Heart. 2008 May;94(5):571-2
pubmed: 17085529
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Dec;63(4):439-43
pubmed: 15558775
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Aug;43(2):193-5
pubmed: 25921347
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jul 1;80(1):79-82
pubmed: 22105903
Congenit Heart Dis. 2014 Mar-Apr;9(2):122-5
pubmed: 23682833

Auteurs

Prakash Kumar (P)

Department of Cardiology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Science, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.

Puneet Aggarwaal (P)

Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208002, India.

Santosh Kumar Sinha (SK)

Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208002, India.

Umeshwar Pandey (U)

Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208002, India.

Mahmodula Razi (M)

Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208002, India.

Awdesh Kumar Sharma (AK)

Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208002, India.

Ramesh Thakur (R)

Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208002, India.

Chandra Mohan Varma (CM)

Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208002, India.

Vinay Krishna (V)

Department of Cardiology, LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208002, India.

Classifications MeSH