Examining the relationships between parent experiences and youth self-reports of slapping/spanking: a population-based cross-sectional study.
Adolescent
Adult
Child Abuse
/ psychology
Crime Victims
/ psychology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Family Characteristics
Female
Humans
Male
Mental Disorders
/ epidemiology
Ontario
/ epidemiology
Parent-Child Relations
Parents
/ psychology
Punishment
Risk Factors
Self Report
Socioeconomic Factors
Substance-Related Disorders
/ epidemiology
Adolescents
Child maltreatment
Mental health
Prevention
Spanking
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Oct 2019
22 Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
04
03
2019
accepted:
09
10
2019
entrez:
24
10
2019
pubmed:
24
10
2019
medline:
11
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Slapping/spanking is related to a number of poor health outcomes. Understanding what factors are related to the increased or decreased use of spanking/slapping is necessary to inform prevention. This study used a population-based sample to determine the prevalence of slapping/spanking reported by youth; the relationship between sociodemographic factors and slapping/spanking; and the extent to which parental exposures to victimization and maltreatment in childhood and current parental mental health, substance use and family circumstances, are associated with youth reports of slapping/spanking. Data were from the 2014 Ontario Child Health Study, a provincially representative sample of households with children and youth aged 4-17 years. Self-reported lifetime slapping/spanking prevalence was determined using a sub-sample of youth aged 14-17 years (n = 1883). Parents/primary caregivers (i.e., person most knowledgeable (PMK) of the youth) self-reported their own childhood experiences including bullying victimization, slapping/spanking and child maltreatment, and current mental health, substance use and family circumstances including mental health functioning and emotional well-being, alcohol use, smoking, marital conflict and family functioning. Analyses were conducted in 2018. Living in urban compared to rural residence and family poverty were associated with decreased odds of slapping/spanking. PMK childhood experiences of physical and verbal bullying victimization, spanking, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, and exposure to physical intimate partner violence were associated with increased odds of youth reported slapping/spanking (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] ranged from 1.33-1.77). PMK experiences of physical abuse and exposure to emotional/verbal intimate partner violence in childhood was associated with decreased odds of youth reported slapping/spanking (AOR = 0.72 and 0.88, respectively). PMK's higher levels of marital conflict, languishing to moderate mental health functioning and emotional well-being, and moderate or greater alcohol use were associated with increased odds of youth reported slapping/spanking (AOR ranged from 1.36-1.61). It may be important to consider parent/primary caregiver's childhood experiences with victimization and maltreatment along with their current parental mental health, substance use and family circumstances when developing and testing strategies to prevent slapping/spanking.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Slapping/spanking is related to a number of poor health outcomes. Understanding what factors are related to the increased or decreased use of spanking/slapping is necessary to inform prevention. This study used a population-based sample to determine the prevalence of slapping/spanking reported by youth; the relationship between sociodemographic factors and slapping/spanking; and the extent to which parental exposures to victimization and maltreatment in childhood and current parental mental health, substance use and family circumstances, are associated with youth reports of slapping/spanking.
METHODS
METHODS
Data were from the 2014 Ontario Child Health Study, a provincially representative sample of households with children and youth aged 4-17 years. Self-reported lifetime slapping/spanking prevalence was determined using a sub-sample of youth aged 14-17 years (n = 1883). Parents/primary caregivers (i.e., person most knowledgeable (PMK) of the youth) self-reported their own childhood experiences including bullying victimization, slapping/spanking and child maltreatment, and current mental health, substance use and family circumstances including mental health functioning and emotional well-being, alcohol use, smoking, marital conflict and family functioning. Analyses were conducted in 2018.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Living in urban compared to rural residence and family poverty were associated with decreased odds of slapping/spanking. PMK childhood experiences of physical and verbal bullying victimization, spanking, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, and exposure to physical intimate partner violence were associated with increased odds of youth reported slapping/spanking (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] ranged from 1.33-1.77). PMK experiences of physical abuse and exposure to emotional/verbal intimate partner violence in childhood was associated with decreased odds of youth reported slapping/spanking (AOR = 0.72 and 0.88, respectively). PMK's higher levels of marital conflict, languishing to moderate mental health functioning and emotional well-being, and moderate or greater alcohol use were associated with increased odds of youth reported slapping/spanking (AOR ranged from 1.36-1.61).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
It may be important to consider parent/primary caregiver's childhood experiences with victimization and maltreatment along with their current parental mental health, substance use and family circumstances when developing and testing strategies to prevent slapping/spanking.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31640664
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7729-6
pii: 10.1186/s12889-019-7729-6
pmc: PMC6805493
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1345Références
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011 Aug 1;33(8):1364-1373
pubmed: 21686081
J Interpers Violence. 2012 Jul;27(11):2208-29
pubmed: 22258077
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006 Sep;194(9):676-83
pubmed: 16971819
CMAJ. 2014 Jun 10;186(9):E324-32
pubmed: 24756625
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Jul;69:10-19
pubmed: 28419887
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2007 Jan;46(1):64-9
pubmed: 17164512
Pediatrics. 2011 Apr;127(4):612-8
pubmed: 21402627
Am Psychol. 2007 Feb-Mar;62(2):95-108
pubmed: 17324035
Pediatrics. 2012 Aug;130(2):184-92
pubmed: 22753561
J Interpers Violence. 2007 Oct;22(10):1285-304
pubmed: 17766727
CMAJ. 2012 Sep 4;184(12):1373-7
pubmed: 22311946
Child Maltreat. 2001 May;6(2):118-29
pubmed: 16705787
J Interpers Violence. 2011 Jan;26(1):71-87
pubmed: 20522884
Psychol Rep. 2010 Oct;107(2):425-40
pubmed: 21117468
CMAJ. 1999 Oct 5;161(7):805-9
pubmed: 10530296
Lancet. 2000 Sep 2;356(9232):814-9
pubmed: 11022929
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 May;43:73-82
pubmed: 25676108
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Jun;32(6):649-57
pubmed: 18571232
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Sep;71:24-31
pubmed: 28126359
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Sep;71:9-23
pubmed: 28162793
Pediatrics. 2019 Feb;143(2):
pubmed: 30705141
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Nov;32(11):1037-57
pubmed: 18992940
Fam Process. 1988 Mar;27(1):97-104
pubmed: 3360100
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Feb;76:44-55
pubmed: 29032186
J Fam Psychol. 2016 Jun;30(4):453-69
pubmed: 27055181
Psychol Bull. 2002 Jul;128(4):539-79
pubmed: 12081081
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6 Suppl):1952-8
pubmed: 15173466
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2006 Jul;76(3):395-402
pubmed: 16981819
Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Oct;30(10):1093-103
pubmed: 17010436
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Sep;71:3-4
pubmed: 28987234
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;45(2):260-73
pubmed: 14982240
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;73(3):539-48
pubmed: 15982151
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2018 May;88:66-73
pubmed: 29610544