Benefit of subcutaneous patient controlled analgesia after total knee arthroplasty.

3D, three dimensional ACL, anterior cruciate ligament MRI, magnetic resonance imaging PCA, Patient controlled analgesia osteoarthritis: OA Subcutaneous patient controlled analgesia (PCA) TKA, total knee arthroplasty Total knee arthroplasty (TKA). postoperative pain control

Journal

Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology
ISSN: 2214-6873
Titre abrégé: Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 101648546

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 08 01 2019
revised: 04 09 2019
accepted: 09 09 2019
entrez: 24 10 2019
pubmed: 24 10 2019
medline: 24 10 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Subcutaneous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been widely used for orthopedic surgeries including total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to clarify the usefulness of subcutaneous PCA in the early phase after TKA. Our subjects consisted of 88 osteoarthritis knee patients who underwent primary TKA, and were classified into two groups: 42 patients received a subcutaneous PCA (containing fentanyl and droleptan) after operation (PCA group), and 46 patients were managed without a subcutaneous PCA (control group). We compared the incidence of side effects for 3 days postoperatively, measuring the number of times patients used adjuvant analgesia and range of motion on day 7 between the two groups. 34 of 42 patients in the PCA group tolerated PCA use until POD 3 (continuation sub-group), while 8 patients could not continue PCA (interruption sub-group). Demographic data of the two sub-groups were compared. The mean number of times adjunctive analgesics were used by the PCA group (3.7 ± 2.2) was significantly less than in the control group (5.4 ± 2.8) (p = 0.0049). There were no significant differences in the frequency of side effects between the two groups. There was no significant difference in range of motion between the two groups. Comparing the continuation and interruption sub-groups, patients over 80 years old were at risk to discontinue a subcutaneous PCA (p = 0.0319, odds ratio 5.4). These findings demonstrate that subcutaneous PCA would be a safe postoperative pain regimen for TKA patients, but the effect was not enough to promote early functional recovery. Therapeutic, Level Ⅱ.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31641618
doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2019.09.001
pii: S2214-6873(19)30001-9
pmc: PMC6796556
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

18-22

Informations de copyright

© 2019 Asia Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd.

Références

J Adv Nurs. 1999 Oct;30(4):875-81
pubmed: 10520100
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Sep;21(9):1257-63
pubmed: 23973139
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD003071
pubmed: 12917945
Acta Orthop. 2007 Apr;78(2):172-9
pubmed: 17464603
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Apr;97(2):139-44
pubmed: 21388906
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Jul;22(7):1638-43
pubmed: 23306715
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jan;30(1):31-7
pubmed: 25175846
Acta Orthop. 2008 Apr;79(2):174-83
pubmed: 18484242
Can J Anaesth. 1998 May;45(5 Pt 1):435-42
pubmed: 9598258
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jul 05;15:220
pubmed: 24996539
J Arthroplasty. 1991;6 Suppl:S23-8
pubmed: 1774567
Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1144-62
pubmed: 20966667
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Dec;21(12):2680-4
pubmed: 22491708
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):135-40
pubmed: 19680735
Arthroplast Today. 2017 Apr 15;3(4):281-285
pubmed: 29204497
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999;119(5-6):267-70
pubmed: 10447620
Br J Anaesth. 1994 May;72(5):533-6
pubmed: 8198903
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2004 May;33(5 Suppl):10-2
pubmed: 15195937
Anesth Analg. 1988 May;67(5):457-61
pubmed: 3364765
Acta Orthop. 2007 Apr;78(2):187-92
pubmed: 17464605
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 May;88(5):959-63
pubmed: 16651569
Anesth Analg. 2002 Jan;94(1):130-7, table of contents
pubmed: 11772815
J Clin Anesth. 1993 May-Jun;5(3):182-93
pubmed: 8318237
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2008 Dec;16(3):381-4
pubmed: 19126912
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2012 Apr;20(1):23-6
pubmed: 22535806
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1986;37(4):247-57
pubmed: 2882642
Knee. 2009 Aug;16(4):280-4
pubmed: 19299145

Auteurs

Yusuke Nakagawa (Y)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.

Toshifumi Watanabe (T)

Second Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 2-1-50, Minami-Koshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan.

Yusuke Amano (Y)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.

Masafumi Horie (M)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.

Tomomasa Nakamura (T)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.

Koji Otabe (K)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.

Mai Katakura (M)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.

Ichiro Sekiya (I)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.

Takeshi Muneta (T)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center, 3256, Midori-cho, Tachikawa, Tokyo, Japan.

Hideyuki Koga (H)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.

Classifications MeSH