Validation of Diaporthe toxica resistance markers in European Lupinus angustifolius germplasm and identification of novel resistance donors for marker-assisted selection.


Journal

Journal of applied genetics
ISSN: 2190-3883
Titre abrégé: J Appl Genet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9514582

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Historique:
received: 29 04 2019
accepted: 03 09 2019
revised: 22 08 2019
pubmed: 24 10 2019
medline: 9 6 2020
entrez: 24 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The fungus, Diaporthe toxica, anamorph Phomopsis sp., previously classified as P. leptostromiformis, is a plant endophyte and occasional pathogen, causing Phomopsis stem blight. This disease is damaging not only to lupins but also to the animals grazing on infected plants, due to the toxic secondary metabolites called phomopsins. The aim of this work was to validate markers for resistance to Phomopsis stem blight in narrow-leafed lupins and identify novel germplasm with increased levels of resistance to the disease. Plant inoculations were performed using ten isolates of D. toxica, originating from Australia and Poland. The European core collection of L. angustifolius was evaluated both in a controlled environment and with field experiments to classify the accessions based on their resistance to the disease. Simultaneously, the accessions were assayed with disease resistance markers to identify donors of hypothetical resistance alleles. We have found that the European lupin germplasm collection preserves wild and domesticated donors of at least two resistance genes to Phomopsis stem blight, including Phr1 and PhtjR. Molecular markers PhtjM7, InDel2, and InDel10, tagging PhtjR gene, were applicable for marker-assisted selection targeting the European gene pool with an expected accuracy of 95%. None of diagnostic markers for the Phr1 locus was found useful for European breeding programs; two existing markers Ph258M1 and Ph258M2 were unreliable, due to a high percentage of false-positive results (up to 58%) and a high recombination rate between markers (~ 30%).

Identifiants

pubmed: 31641945
doi: 10.1007/s13353-019-00521-y
pii: 10.1007/s13353-019-00521-y
pmc: PMC6968985
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-12

Subventions

Organisme : National Science Centre
ID : Project no. 2015/17/D/NZ9/02112

Références

Ann Bot. 2003 Sep;92(3):349-55
pubmed: 12853281
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jul;35(Web Server issue):W71-4
pubmed: 17485472
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Apr 21;6:268
pubmed: 25954293
Theor Appl Genet. 2018 Jan;131(1):209-223
pubmed: 29051970
J Hered. 2011 Mar-Apr;102(2):228-36
pubmed: 20947695
Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1982 Jun;60(3):239-51
pubmed: 7138414
BMC Genomics. 2016 Oct 21;17(1):820
pubmed: 27769166
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Sep 08;6:705
pubmed: 26442020
Chromosome Res. 2016 Sep;24(3):355-78
pubmed: 27168155
BMC Genomics. 2013 Feb 05;14:79
pubmed: 23379841
Plant J. 1993 Aug;4(2):403-10
pubmed: 8106085
Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2005;10(2):331-44
pubmed: 16010297
New Phytol. 2017 Jan;213(1):220-232
pubmed: 27418400
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Oct;129(10):1915-32
pubmed: 27435735
Theor Appl Genet. 2015 Oct;128(10):2121-30
pubmed: 26169875
Plant J. 1998 May;14(3):387-92
pubmed: 9628033
Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2006;11(3):396-407
pubmed: 16847554
Plant Biotechnol J. 2017 Mar;15(3):318-330
pubmed: 27557478
Breed Sci. 2013 Sep;63(3):292-300
pubmed: 24273424
PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e64799
pubmed: 23734219
Theor Appl Genet. 2002 Aug;105(2-3):265-270
pubmed: 12582528
Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 08;5:11171
pubmed: 26054055
Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Mar;124(4):637-52
pubmed: 22069118
Plant Mol Biol Report. 2015;33:84-101
pubmed: 25620837
Breed Sci. 2014 May;64(1):83-9
pubmed: 24987293
Theor Appl Genet. 2013 Feb;126(2):511-22
pubmed: 23086512
Genome Biol. 2016 Mar 23;17:53
pubmed: 27009100
Trends Genet. 2002 Dec;18(12):613-5
pubmed: 12446140
Plant Biotechnol J. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-25
pubmed: 25060816
BMC Genomics. 2011 Oct 21;12:521
pubmed: 22014081
BMC Genomics. 2015 Sep 02;16:660
pubmed: 26329386
Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Jul;113(2):225-38
pubmed: 16791689
Science. 1960 Oct 21;132(3434):1115-8
pubmed: 17790723

Auteurs

M Książkiewicz (M)

Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszynska 34, 60-479, Poznań, Poland.

K Wójcik (K)

Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszynska 34, 60-479, Poznań, Poland.

W Irzykowski (W)

Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszynska 34, 60-479, Poznań, Poland.

W Bielski (W)

Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszynska 34, 60-479, Poznań, Poland.

S Rychel (S)

Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszynska 34, 60-479, Poznań, Poland.

J Kaczmarek (J)

Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszynska 34, 60-479, Poznań, Poland.

P Plewiński (P)

Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszynska 34, 60-479, Poznań, Poland.

E Rudy (E)

Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszynska 34, 60-479, Poznań, Poland.

M Jędryczka (M)

Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszynska 34, 60-479, Poznań, Poland. mjed@igr.poznan.pl.

Articles similaires

C-Reactive Protein Humans Biomarkers Inflammation
Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi

A scenario for an evolutionary selection of ageing.

Tristan Roget, Claire Macmurray, Pierre Jolivet et al.
1.00
Aging Selection, Genetic Biological Evolution Animals Fertility
Genome, Viral Ralstonia Composting Solanum lycopersicum Bacteriophages

Classifications MeSH