A multi-phase study for the development of a self-efficacy measuring scale for ostomy care nursing management.
instrument development
nursing
ostomy care
reliability
self-efficacy
stoma management
validation
Journal
Journal of advanced nursing
ISSN: 1365-2648
Titre abrégé: J Adv Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7609811
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
11
07
2019
revised:
14
09
2019
accepted:
15
10
2019
pubmed:
24
10
2019
medline:
22
9
2020
entrez:
24
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To develop and psychometrically test a self-efficacy scale for ostomy care nursing management. This study adopted a multi-method and multi-phase design. Phase 1 of the study was comprised of the developmental tasks, where items were generated based on the emergent themes from literature. The items were then discussed with a panel of experts. Phase 2 focused on the validation process of the scale, where its content validity, construct and concurrent validity, and its internal consistency were assessed. The validation process was conducted between January 2018 - January 2019. The final version of the self-efficacy scale in ostomy care nursing management encompasses 24 items in three domains, namely the clinical assessment domain, the education and relationship domain, and the teamwork domain. The scale showed the evidence of face and content validity, adequate construct and concurrent validity, and adequate internal consistency. The developed scale can be used in clinical and educational research. This study presents the development and validation of the first valid and reliable self-reporting measurement for nurses' self-efficacy in ostomy care nursing management. Self-efficacy ostomy care nursing management encompasses 24 items and three domains, which are clinical assessment, education and relationship, and teamwork. This research will have an impact on nursing education, as it addresses the need for a specific self-efficacy assessment of ostomy care nursing management. Self-efficacy ostomy care nursing management will have an impact on nurses and patients, as it can be used to improve nurses' self-efficacy and clinical outcomes for patients in ostomy care. 目的: 建立一种造口护理管理自我效能感量表,并对其进行心理测量。 设计: 本研究采用多方法多阶段设计方法。 方法: 第一阶段的研究是由发展性任务组成的,其中的项目是根据文学中涌现的主题生成的。随后,专家小组对这些问题进行了讨论。第二阶段为量表的验证过程,对量表的内容效度、构念效度、同时效度及内部一致性进行评估。验证过程在2018年1月至2019年1月期间进行。 结果: 造口护理自我效能感量表的最终版本包括24个项目,分三个领域,即临床评估领域、教育与关系领域、团队合作领域。量表包括面效度和内容效度、适当的构念和同时效度以及适当的内部一致性。 结论: 该量表可用于临床和教育研究。 影响: 本研究提出了第一个有效的和可靠的报告测量护士的自我效能在造口护理管理的发展和验证。自我效能造口护理管理包括 24个项目和3个领域,即临床评估、教育和关系、团队合作。这项研究将对护理教育产生影响,因为它能满足对造口护理管理进行特异性自我效能评估的需要。自我效能造口护理管理将对护士和患者产生影响,因为它可以用来提高护士的自我效能和改善造口护理患者的临床结果。.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(chi)
目的: 建立一种造口护理管理自我效能感量表,并对其进行心理测量。 设计: 本研究采用多方法多阶段设计方法。 方法: 第一阶段的研究是由发展性任务组成的,其中的项目是根据文学中涌现的主题生成的。随后,专家小组对这些问题进行了讨论。第二阶段为量表的验证过程,对量表的内容效度、构念效度、同时效度及内部一致性进行评估。验证过程在2018年1月至2019年1月期间进行。 结果: 造口护理自我效能感量表的最终版本包括24个项目,分三个领域,即临床评估领域、教育与关系领域、团队合作领域。量表包括面效度和内容效度、适当的构念和同时效度以及适当的内部一致性。 结论: 该量表可用于临床和教育研究。 影响: 本研究提出了第一个有效的和可靠的报告测量护士的自我效能在造口护理管理的发展和验证。自我效能造口护理管理包括 24个项目和3个领域,即临床评估、教育和关系、团队合作。这项研究将对护理教育产生影响,因为它能满足对造口护理管理进行特异性自我效能评估的需要。自我效能造口护理管理将对护士和患者产生影响,因为它可以用来提高护士的自我效能和改善造口护理患者的临床结果。.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
409-419Subventions
Organisme : IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
Informations de copyright
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Beitz, J. M., & Colwell, J. C. (2016). Management approaches to stomal and peristomal complications. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 43(3), 263-268. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000215
Blackwell, H. (2015). A stoma care nurse specialist. British Journal of Nursing, 24(Sup5), S16-S16. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2015.24.Sup5.S16
Boyles, A., & Hunt, S. (2016). Care and management of a stoma: Maintaining peristomal skin health. British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen Publishing), 25(17), S14-S21. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2016.25.17.S14
Burch, J. (2018). Research and expert opinion on siting a stoma: A review of the literature. British Journal of Nursing, 27(16), S4-S12. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2018.27.16.S4
Carlsson, E., & Pettersson, M. E. (2018). Communicative and pedagogical strategies in nurses’ and surgeons’ discharge consultations with patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(12), 2840-2850. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13798
Caruso, R., Fida, R., Sili, A., & Arrigoni, C. (2016). Towards an integrated model of nursing competence: An overview of the literature reviews and concept analysis. Professioni Infermieristiche, 69(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.7429/pi.2016.691035
Caruso, R., Pittella, F., Zaghini, F., Fida, R., & Sili, A. (2016). Development and validation of the nursing profession self-efficacy scale. International Nursing Review, 63(3), 455-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12291
Caruso, R., Rocco, G., Shaffer, F. A., & Stievano, A. (2019). Current data of foreign-educated nurses in italy and the recognition of their professional qualifications. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000325
CDC. (2012). US cancer statistics working group-United States cancer statistics: 1999-2009 Incidence and Mortality Data. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/uscs/
Dellafiore, F., Arrigoni, C., Ghizzardi, G., Baroni, I., Conte, G., Turrini, F., … Caruso, R. (2019). Development and validation of the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOCN.14875
Dellafiore, F., Caruso, R., Conte, G., Grugnetti, A. M., Bellani, S., & Arrigoni, C. (2019). Individual-level determinants of interprofessional team collaboration in healthcare. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 1-6, https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1594732
Dellafiore, F., Conte, G., Baroni, I., Pittella, F., Di Pasquale, C., Nania, T., … Caruso, R. (2019). Ostomy adjustment inventory-23 (OAI-23): Development and testing of the Italian version. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 46(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000493
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Toronto: Wiley.
Duruk, N., & Uçar, H. (2013). Staff nursesʼ knowledge and perceived responsibilities for delivering care to patients with intestinal ostomies. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 40(6), 618-622. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3182a9a7ed
Forsmo, H. M., Pfeffer, F., Rasdal, A., Sintonen, H., Körner, H., & Erichsen, C. (2016). Pre- and postoperative stoma education and guidance within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme reduces length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery. International Journal of Surgery, 36(Pt A), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.031
Grainger, J. T., Maeda, Y., Donnelly, S. C., & Vaizey, C. J. (2018). Assessment and management of patients with intestinal failure: A multidisciplinary approach. Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, 11, 233-241. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S122868
Grant, M., McCorkle, R., Hornbrook, M. C., Wendel, C. S., & Krouse, R. (2013). Development of a chronic care ostomy self-management program. Journal of Cancer Education, 28(1), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0433-1
Holmgren, K., Kverneng Hultberg, D., Haapamäki, M. M., Matthiessen, P., Rutegård, J., & Rutegård, M. (2017). High stoma prevalence and stoma reversal complications following anterior resection for rectal cancer: A population-based multicentre study. Colorectal Disease, 19(12), 1067-1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13771
Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Kimhi, E., Reishtein, J. L., Cohen, M., Friger, M., Hurvitz, N., & Avraham, R. (2016). Impact of simulation and clinical experience on self-efficacy in nursing students. Nurse Educator, 41(1), E1-E4. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000194
Koc, U., Karaman, K., Gomceli, I., Dalgic, T., Ozer, I., Ulas, M., … Akoglu, M. (2017). A retrospective analysis of factors affecting early stoma complications. Ostomy/Wound Management, 63(1), 28-32.
Krouse, R. S., Grant, M., McCorkle, R., Wendel, C. S., Cobb, M. D., Tallman, N. J., … Hornbrook, M. C. (2016). A chronic care ostomy self-management program for cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 25(5), 574-581. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4078
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 30, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale: Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439-457. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457
Macindo, J. R. B., Soriano, C. A. F., Gonzales, H. R. M., Simbulan, P. J. T., Torres, G. C. S., & Que, J. C. (2018). Development and psychometric appraisal of the pain management self-efficacy questionnaire. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(8), 1993-2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/JAN.13582
Phatak, U. R., Li, L. T., Karanjawala, B., Chang, G. J., & Kao, L. S. (2014). Systematic review of educational interventions for ostomates. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 57(4), 529-537. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000044
Plaza, C., & Draugalis, J. (2002). Curricular evaluation using self-efficacy measurements. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 66(1), 51-54.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2014). Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Critical Care Nurse (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins Health. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2014573.
Rattray, J., & Jones, M. C. (2007). Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(2), 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x
Reinwalds, M., Blixter, A., & Carlsson, E. (2018). Living with a resected rectum after rectal cancer surgery-Struggling not to let bowel function control life. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(3-4), e623-e634. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14112
Reise, S. P., Waller, N. G., & Comrey, A. L. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 12(3), 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.3.287
Robb, M. (2012). Self-efficacy with application to nursing education: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 47(3), 166-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2012.00267.x
Salanova, M., Lorente, L., Chambel, M. J., & Martínez, I. M. (2011). Linking transformational leadership to nurses’ extra-role performance: The mediating role of self-efficacy and work engagement. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(10), 2256-2266. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2648.2011.05652.X
Scholz, U., Gutiérrez, B., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242
Stelton, S., Zulkowski, K., & Ayello, E. A. (2015). Practice implications for peristomal skin assessment and care from the 2014 world council of enterostomal therapists international ostomy guideline. Advances in Skin & Wound Care, 28(6), 275-284. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000465374.42350.0f
Stokes, A. L., Tice, S., Follett, S., Paskey, D., Abraham, L., Bealer, C., … Puleo, F. J. (2017). Institution of a preoperative stoma education group class decreases rate of peristomal complications in new stoma patients. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 44(4), 363-367. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000338
VanVoorhis, C. R. W., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043
Villa, G., Manara, D. F., Brancato, T., Rocco, G., Stievano, A., Vellone, E., & Alvaro, R. (2018). Life with a urostomy: A phenomenological study. Applied Nursing Research, 39, 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2017.10.005
Villa, G., Vellone, E., Sciara, S., Stievano, A., Proietti, M. G., Manara, D. F., … Pantaleo, G. (2019). Two new tools for self-care in ostomy patients and their informal caregivers: Psychosocial, clinical and operative aspects. International Journal of Urological Nursing, 13(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijun.12177
Waller, A., Forshaw, K., Bryant, J., Carey, M., Boyes, A., & Sanson-Fisher, R. (2015). Preparatory education for cancer patients undergoing surgery: A systematic review of volume and quality of research output over time. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(12), 1540-1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PEC.2015.05.008
Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 219-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807
Wilson, F. R., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. A. (2012). Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 45(3), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175612440286