Neurogenic bladder is an independent risk factor for complications associated with inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.


Journal

International journal of impotence research
ISSN: 1476-5489
Titre abrégé: Int J Impot Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007383

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 30 06 2019
accepted: 04 10 2019
revised: 30 09 2019
pubmed: 28 10 2019
medline: 3 3 2021
entrez: 25 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Men with neurogenic bladder (NGB) often have concomitant erectile dysfunction and may be considered for inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement. However, it is unclear if NGB is a risk factor for complications associated with IPP placement. The aim of this study is to compare surgical outcomes after IPP placement in a contemporary cohort of patients with NGB to that of a non-neurogenic control group. To accomplish this, consecutive records of patients who underwent IPP implantation between 2007 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a known neurologic lesion and documented NGB by clinical or urodynamic criteria were compared with a non-neurogenic control group of men with erectile dysfunction. We found that patients in the NGB cohort were younger (median age 48 vs. 62 years, p < 0.001) and less likely to void spontaneously prior to surgery (3% vs. 97%, p < 0.001). The most common cause for NGB was spinal cord injury (46%). There was a 24.3% overall rate of complication (infection, erosion, or mechanical failure) in the NGB cohort compared with a 7.5% rate in the non-neurogenic control group (p = 0.001). On multivariate logistic regression modeling, NGB (OR 3.47; 95% CI 1.13-10.71; p = 0.03) was independently associated with risk of IPP complication. First time penile prosthesis was associated with lower risk of IPP complication (OR 0.25 95% CI 0.09-0.71; p = 0.01). In conclusion, patients with NGB are at increased risk for complications after IPP placement. Patients should be counseled accordingly, and all efforts should be made to stabilize bladder function prior to surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31645755
doi: 10.1038/s41443-019-0210-3
pii: 10.1038/s41443-019-0210-3
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

520-524

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Références

Barton GJ, Carlos EC, Lentz AC. Sexual quality of life and satisfaction with penile prostheses. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7:178–88.
doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.10.003
Rodriguez KM, Kohn TP, Davis AB, Hakky TS. Penile implants: a look into the future. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6 Suppl 5:S860–6.
doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.05.28
Li K, Brandes ER, Chang SL, Leow JJ, Chung BI, Wang Y, et al. Trends in penile prosthesis implantation and analysis of predictive factors for removal. World J Urol. 2019;37:639–46.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2491-4
Trost L, Hellstrom WJ. History, contemporary outcomes, and future of penile prostheses: a review of the literature. Sex Med Rev. 2013;1:150–63.
doi: 10.1002/smrj.8
Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Lakin MM. Penile prosthesis infections. Int J Impot Res. 2001;13:326–8.
doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900768
Wilson SK, Delk JR 2nd. Inflatable penile implant infection: predisposing factors and treatment suggestions. J Urol. 1995;153(3 Pt 1):659–61.
pubmed: 7861509
Pineda M, Burnett AL. Penile prosthesis infections-a review of risk factors, prevention, and treatment. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4:389–98.
doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.03.003
Levine LA, Becher EF, Bella AJ, Brant WO, Kohler TS, Martinez-Salamanca JI, et al. Penile prosthesis surgery: current recommendations from the international consultation on sexual medicine. J Sex Med. 2016;13:489–518.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.017
Kimoto Y, Iwatsubo E. Penile prostheses for the management of the neuropathic bladder and sexual dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients: long term follow up. Paraplegia. 1994;32:336–9.
pubmed: 8058351
Smith AD, Sazama R, Lange PH. Penile prosthesis: adjunct to treatment in patients with neurogenic bladder. J Urol. 1980;124:363–4.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55449-X
Zermann DH, Kutzenberger J, Sauerwein D, Schubert J, Loeffler U. Penile prosthetic surgery in neurologically impaired patients: long-term followup. J Urol. 2006;175:1041–4.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00344-7
Jarow JP. Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection. J Urol. 1996;156:402–4.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65860-9
Steidle CP, Mulcahy JJ. Erosion of penile prostheses: a complication of urethral catheterization. J Urol. 1989;142:736–9.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38871-7

Auteurs

Chirag N Dave (CN)

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Ahmed Khalaf (A)

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Hiten D Patel (HD)

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Taylor P Kohn (TP)

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Arthur L Burnett (AL)

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA. aburnet1@jhmi.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH