Universal implantation of temporary epicardial pacing wires after surgery for congenital heart disease: necessity or luxury?
Arrhythmias
Pacing wires
Paediatric cardiac surgery
Journal
European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
ISSN: 1873-734X
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8804069
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2020
01 03 2020
Historique:
received:
12
06
2019
revised:
08
09
2019
accepted:
17
09
2019
pubmed:
28
10
2019
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
25
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Routine implantation of temporary epicardial pacing wires after surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD) has recently been questioned. We evaluated the incidence of arrhythmias, arrhythmias causing haemodynamic compromise and the safety of a strategy of selective implantation of pacing wires in our unit. All patients who underwent surgery for CHD using cardiopulmonary bypass between September 2015 and December 2016 were retrospectively enrolled in the study (n = 313). Patients were stratified into group A (universal implantation) and group B (selective implantation). Group B received pacing wires only when postoperative rhythm disturbances were anticipated based on the operating surgeon's judgement. The primary outcome was arrhythmia causing haemodynamic compromise. Outcomes were compared between unmatched and propensity matched groups. Forty-eight patients experienced an arrhythmia causing haemodynamic compromise (15.3%). Twenty-three patients (7.3%) experienced an arrhythmia causing haemodynamic compromise that required the use of pacing wires for therapeutic purposes (group A n = 13, group B n = 10, P = 0.34). There were no pacing wire related complications in either group. All patients in group A and 90% in group B had pacing wires when needed (P = 0.435). In group A, 89% of patients had pacing wires which were not used compared with 13% in group B (P < 0.001). Results were unchanged when repeated using propensity matching (81 pairs). The probability of developing a postoperative arrhythmia requiring therapeutic pacing can be predicted using the risk factors identified in our study. The routine implantation of pacing wires after surgery for CHD is not necessary. A measured reduction from universal implantation is safe.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31647532
pii: 5606741
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz285
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
581-587Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.