Animal Welfare and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

animal welfare animal well-being conflicts one welfare sustainability sustainable development goals synergies

Journal

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 16 07 2019
accepted: 17 09 2019
entrez: 26 10 2019
pubmed: 28 10 2019
medline: 28 10 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This paper systematically evaluates the extent to which achieving the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) is compatible with improving animal welfare. The analyses were based on discussion and independent scoring in a group of 12 participants with academic backgrounds within agricultural or veterinary sciences. We considered all categories of animals; those kept for food production, working and companion animals, but also laboratory and wild animals. The strengths of the links between improving animal welfare and achieving an SDG were scored on a 7-point scale, from being completely indivisible, at one end of the scale, to where it is impossible to reach both the SDG and improved animal welfare at the same time. There was good consensus between participants, with the overall scores being positive, indicating that although animal welfare is not explicitly mentioned in the SDGs, working to achieving the SDGs is compatible with working to improve animal welfare. When analyzing the direction of the links, the impact of achieving an SDG was considered, on average, to be slightly better at leading to improved animal welfare, than the impact of improving animal welfare was on achieving the SDG. The exception to this was for SDG 2, dealing with zero hunger. The two SDGs for which there was strongest mutual reinforcing were SDG 12, which deals with responsible production and consumption, and SDG 14, which deals with life below water. Most of the targets under these two SDGs were considered relevant to animal welfare, whereas when all SDGs were considered, 66 targets of the total of 169 were considered relevant. Although the results of this study suggest a mutually beneficial relationship between improving animal welfare and achieving SDGs, this should be confirmed on a wider group of people, for example people from less developed countries and other stakeholders. Showing the relationships between animal welfare and the sustainable development goals helps highlight the importance of animal welfare when implementing these goals in practice. The methodology described in this study could also be useful to researchers working with other societal and environmental issues not yet considered within the overall SDG framework.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31649940
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00336
pmc: PMC6797006
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

336

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Keeling, Tunón, Olmos Antillón, Berg, Jones, Stuardo, Swanson, Wallenbeck, Winckler and Blokhuis.

Références

Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 25;280(1771):20132025
pubmed: 24068362
Nature. 2016 Jun 15;534(7607):320-2
pubmed: 27306173
Sustain Sci. 2018;13(2):531-548
pubmed: 30147787
Vet Rec. 2016 Oct 22;179(16):412-413
pubmed: 27770094
Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 06;5:25300
pubmed: 25660757
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Feb 1;150:8-18
pubmed: 29406088
Animals (Basel). 2018 May 25;8(6):null
pubmed: 29799456

Auteurs

Linda Keeling (L)

Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Håkan Tunón (H)

Swedish Biodiversity Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Gabriela Olmos Antillón (G)

Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Charlotte Berg (C)

Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Mike Jones (M)

Swedish Biodiversity Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Leopoldo Stuardo (L)

World Organisation for Animal Health, Standards Department, Paris, France.

Janice Swanson (J)

Department of Animal Science and Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.

Anna Wallenbeck (A)

Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Christoph Winckler (C)

Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Harry Blokhuis (H)

Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH