Surgical Implant Generation Network Implant Follow-up: Assessment of Squat and Smile and Fracture Healing.
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic trauma
ISSN: 1531-2291
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Trauma
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8807705
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
28
10
2019
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
26
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the Squat and Smile (S&S) test, a clinical photographic follow-up, in determination of fracture healing and to assess the extent of continued fracture healing beyond 1-year postoperation. Retrospective review of the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) database. The S&S test is utilized in low-resource settings where the SIGN intramedullary nail is used due to unavailability of intraoperative fluoroscopy. One hundred fifty patients undergoing fracture fixation utilizing SIGN intramedullary nails with data available at least 1 year (9-16 months) after surgery. None. We extracted clinical data and calculated scores for the S&S photographs and radiographs at the 1-year (9-16 month postoperative) follow-up and last follow-up available beyond that. We analyzed the sensitivity of S&S scoring, using Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia fracture scores as the gold standard for fracture union. Of the 126 patients analyzed, 21% were found to have incomplete healing at 1 year, whereas 17% of the 64 patients with further follow-up past 1 year had incomplete healing. We found that both S&S and radiographic fracture healing scores had good interrater reliability (k = 0.73-0.78 for S&S and 0.94 for radiographs). The S&S test had poor sensitivity (0.11) and specificity (0.85) in determining fracture healing at the 1-year follow-up. The S&S scoring method was reliable but neither sensitive nor specific for determining fracture healing at 1 year. Fractures deemed incompletely healed by radiographic evaluation at 1 year after SIGN implant may still have the potential to heal over time. Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31652187
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001671
pmc: PMC7202799
mid: NIHMS1583383
pii: 00005131-202004000-00002
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
174-179Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 AR055885
Pays : United States
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Aug;86(8):1819-22
pubmed: 15292432
J Pak Med Assoc. 2015 Nov;65(11 Suppl 3):S175-8
pubmed: 26878515
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jul;473(7):2394-401
pubmed: 25894807
Orthop Clin North Am. 2016 Jan;47(1):57-66
pubmed: 26614921
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 20;101(4):353-359
pubmed: 30801374
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Apr;90(4):915-23
pubmed: 18381331
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Oct;466(10):2306-16
pubmed: 18679760
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Nov;29(11):516-20
pubmed: 26165265
J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jan;33(1):42-48
pubmed: 30277978
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Dec;29(12):e469-75
pubmed: 26595597
Int Orthop. 2007 Aug;31(4):487-90
pubmed: 17039384
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Mar;31(3):127-130
pubmed: 28072652
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Dec;83(12):1912
pubmed: 11741073
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Mar;24 Suppl 1:S81-6
pubmed: 20182243
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Oct;466(10):2443-50
pubmed: 18685912
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2009 Jan-Mar;21(1):21-4
pubmed: 20364733
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Oct;468(10):2592-7
pubmed: 20593255
World J Surg. 2013 Feb;37(2):349-55
pubmed: 23052810
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Mar;23(3):203-7
pubmed: 23458044
J Orthop. 2013 Oct 23;10(4):182-7
pubmed: 24396239
Int Orthop. 2011 Jan;35(1):107-11
pubmed: 20148329
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Oct 5;93(19):1811-8
pubmed: 22005867
Acta Orthop. 2011 Dec;82(6):737-43
pubmed: 22066554