Comparative characterization of bacterial communities in geese consuming of different proportions of ryegrass.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
22
04
2019
accepted:
20
09
2019
entrez:
26
10
2019
pubmed:
28
10
2019
medline:
17
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Geese are extremely well-adapted to utilizing plant-derived roughage in their diet, so the grass must be added to commercial diets under intensive rearing systems. However, it is unclear whether the gut microbiota will change significantly when adding different proportions of ryegrass. In this study, 240 healthy male Yangzhou geese (28 days old) with similar body weights were randomly divided into four groups and fed different proportions grass (CK, whole commercial diets; EG1, ryegrass: commercial diets = 1.5:1; EG2, ryegrass: commercial diets = 2:1; EG3, ryegrass: commercial diets = 3:1) respectively. When the geese grew to 70 days old, their intestines were collected and high-throughput sequencing technology was performed to investigate the microbial diversity in the caecum of geese with different dietary supplements. There was no obvious change in the alpha diversity of gut microbiota of geese with ryegrass intake (P > 0.05) and the composition of dominant bacterium (including Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes) was also similar. However, the ratio between Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes was remarkably reduced with ryegrass intake (P < 0.05), and the relative abundance of 30 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) significantly differed. Additionally, the content of cellulose-degrading microbiota such as Ruminiclostridium and Ruminococcaceae UCG-010 were significantly increased in geese fed with increasing amounts of grass. Finally, the functional profiles of the goose gut microbiota were explored using the PICRUSt tool. Carbohydrate metabolism and amino acid metabolism were dominant metabolic pathways. Lipid metabolism was significantly increased in EG3 compared that in the CK group (P < 0.05). Interestingly, Turicibacter and Parasutterella may have affected abdominal fat deposition as grass intake increased. Taken together, although the diversity of bacterial communities was similar in geese fed with different proportions of ryegrass, cellulose-degrading microbiota (Ruminiclostridium and Ruminococcaceae UCG-010) were abundant and the lipid metabolic pathway was enriched, which may reduce abdominal fat accumulation in high-ryegrass fed geese.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31652267
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223445
pii: PONE-D-19-11395
pmc: PMC6814310
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0223445Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 18;109(38):15485-90
pubmed: 22955886
Br J Nutr. 2014 Aug 14;112(3):416-27
pubmed: 24846282
Cell Host Microbe. 2015 May 13;17(5):553-64
pubmed: 25974298
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Oct;6(10):776-88
pubmed: 18794915
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 15;7:46837
pubmed: 28731455
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 3;12(10):e0185590
pubmed: 28972993
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Nov 09;60(1):507-14
pubmed: 26552974
Front Microbiol. 2018 Sep 13;9:2144
pubmed: 30271392
J Nutr. 2017 Jan;147(1):20-28
pubmed: 27903830
Sci Rep. 2015 Apr 21;5:9938
pubmed: 25898122
Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 20;5:9342
pubmed: 25791609
Nature. 2006 Dec 21;444(7122):1022-3
pubmed: 17183309
MBio. 2015 Sep 29;6(5):e01058-15
pubmed: 26419877
Nature. 2014 Jan 23;505(7484):559-63
pubmed: 24336217
Front Nutr. 2018 Apr 12;5:23
pubmed: 29707542
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015 Jul;362(14):null
pubmed: 26109360
Science. 2011 Oct 7;334(6052):105-8
pubmed: 21885731
Mol Genet Genomics. 2017 Apr;292(2):407-414
pubmed: 28028611
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Jan 17;66(2):551-561
pubmed: 29264925
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015 Aug 13;8:114
pubmed: 26269713
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 2;107(44):18933-8
pubmed: 20937875
ISME J. 2014 Oct;8(10):2116-30
pubmed: 24694712
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 17;107(33):14691-6
pubmed: 20679230
J Nutr Biochem. 2015 Jun;26(6):651-60
pubmed: 25762527
ISME J. 2019 Jun;13(6):1422-1436
pubmed: 30728470
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33306
pubmed: 22432013
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 25;13(9):e0204210
pubmed: 30252869
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013 Jul;11(7):497-504
pubmed: 23748339
ISME J. 2010 Feb;4(2):232-41
pubmed: 19865183
Genome Biol. 2012 Apr 30;13(4):r32
pubmed: 22546241
Food Sci Biotechnol. 2016 Mar 31;25(Suppl 1):153-156
pubmed: 30263500
Environ Microbiol. 2016 Jul;18(7):2081-3
pubmed: 26842002