Reflexive gaze following in common marmoset monkeys.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 10 2019
25 10 2019
Historique:
received:
08
07
2019
accepted:
08
10
2019
entrez:
27
10
2019
pubmed:
28
10
2019
medline:
6
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The ability to extract the direction of the other's gaze allows us to shift our attention to an object of interest to the other and to establish joint attention. By mapping one's own intentions on the object of joint attention, humans develop a Theory of (the other's) Mind (TOM), a functional sequence possibly disrupted in autism. Gaze following of both humans and old world monkeys is orchestrated by very similar cortical architectures, strongly suggesting homology. Also new world monkeys, a primate suborder that split from the old world monkey line about 35 million years ago, have complex social structures and one member of this group, the common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) are known to follow human head-gaze. However, the question is if they use gaze following to establish joint attention with conspecifics. Here we show that this is indeed the case. In a free choice task, head-restrained marmosets prefer objects gazed at by a conspecific and, moreover, they exhibit considerably shorter choice reaction times for the same objects. These findings support the assumption of an evolutionarily old domain specific faculty shared within the primate order and they underline the potential value of marmosets in studies of normal and disturbed joint attention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31653910
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51783-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-51783-9
pmc: PMC6814856
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15292Références
Dev Sci. 2010 Nov;13(6):913-22
pubmed: 20977562
Front Integr Neurosci. 2010 Mar 19;4:5
pubmed: 20428494
J Comp Psychol. 1997 Sep;111(3):286-93
pubmed: 9286096
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991 Nov;43(4):859-80
pubmed: 1775667
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 14;107(37):16048-53
pubmed: 20805482
Vision Res. 2010 Sep 24;50(20):2080-92
pubmed: 20673778
Psychol Sci. 2018 Jun;29(6):984-995
pubmed: 29702031
Curr Biol. 2006 Feb 21;16(4):R119-20
pubmed: 16488858
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 May;15(2):315-30
pubmed: 2525601
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Oct 7;282(1816):20151020
pubmed: 26446808
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013 Jun;23(3):450-5
pubmed: 23266245
Cognition. 1985 Oct;21(1):37-46
pubmed: 2934210
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 9;106(23):9489-94
pubmed: 19470477
Curr Biol. 2015 Aug 31;25(17):2332-7
pubmed: 26279231
Neuron. 2016 Apr 20;90(2):219-33
pubmed: 27100195
J Comp Psychol. 2006 May;120(2):120-30
pubmed: 16719590
Curr Biol. 2003 Sep 16;13(18):1609-13
pubmed: 13678591