Patient-specific finite element computer models improve fracture risk assessments in cancer patients with femoral bone metastases compared to clinical guidelines.


Journal

Bone
ISSN: 1873-2763
Titre abrégé: Bone
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8504048

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2020
Historique:
received: 10 07 2019
revised: 02 10 2019
accepted: 02 10 2019
pubmed: 28 10 2019
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 27 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To determine whether patient-specific finite element (FE) computer models are better at assessing fracture risk for femoral bone metastases compared to clinical assessments based on axial cortical involvement on conventional radiographs, as described in current clinical guidelines. Forty-five patients with 50 femoral bone metastases, who were treated with palliative radiotherapy for pain, were included (64% single fraction (8Gy), 36% multiple fractions (5 or 6x4Gy)) and were followed for six months to determine whether they developed a pathological femoral fracture. All plain radiographs available within a two month period prior to radiotherapy were obtained. Patient-specific FE models were constructed based on the geometry and bone density obtained from the baseline quantitative CT scans used for radiotherapy planning. Femoral failure loads normalized for body weight (BW) were calculated. Patients with a failure load of 7.5 x BW or lower were identified as having high fracture risk, whereas patients with a failure load higher than 7.5 x BW were classified as low fracture risk. Experienced assessors measured axial cortical involvement on conventional radiographs. Following clinical guidelines, patients with lesions larger than 30mm were identified as having a high fracture risk. FE predictions were compared to clinical assessments by means of diagnostic accuracy values (sensitivity, specificity and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV)). Seven femurs (14%) fractured during follow-up. Median time to fracture was 8 weeks. FE models were better at assessing fracture risk in comparison to axial cortical involvement (sensitivity 100% vs. 86%, specificity 74% vs. 42%, PPV 39% vs. 19%, and NPV 100% vs. 95%, for the FE computer model vs. axial cortical involvement, respectively). Patient-specific FE computer models improve fracture risk assessments of femoral bone metastases in advanced cancer patients compared to clinical assessments based on axial cortical involvement, which is currently used in clinical guidelines.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31655223
pii: S8756-3282(19)30394-1
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.115101
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

115101

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Florieke Eggermont (F)

Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: Florieke.Eggermont@radboudumc.nl.

Gerco van der Wal (G)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Paulien Westhoff (P)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Arjonne Laar (A)

Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Marianne de Jong (M)

Radiotherapeutic Institute Friesland, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.

Tom Rozema (T)

Bernard Verbeeten Institute, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

Herman M Kroon (HM)

Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Onarisa Ayu (O)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Loes Derikx (L)

Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Sander Dijkstra (S)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Nico Verdonschot (N)

Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Laboratory of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

Yvette van der Linden (Y)

Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Esther Tanck (E)

Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH