"He can send her to her parents": The interaction between marriageability, gender and serious mental illness in rural Ethiopia.
Discrimination
Marriageability
Serious mental illness
Stigma
Journal
BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 10 2019
26 10 2019
Historique:
received:
22
08
2018
accepted:
12
09
2019
entrez:
28
10
2019
pubmed:
28
10
2019
medline:
28
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For women in most low- and middle-income countries, the diagnosis with serious mental illness (SMI) leads to stigma and challenges related to starting or maintaining marriages. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore perspectives on marriage, divorce and family roles of women with SMI in rural Ethiopia. A qualitative study was conducted in a rural setting of Butajira, South Central Ethiopia. A total of 39 in-depth interviews were carried out with service users (n = 11), caregivers (n = 12), religious leaders (n = 6), health extension workers (n = 4), police officers (n = 2), teachers (n = 2) and government officials (n = 2). Data were analyzed using a thematic approach. Three themes emerged. (1) Marriage and SMI: Chances of getting married for individuals with SMI in general was perceived to be lower: Individuals with SMI experienced various challenges including difficulty finding romantic partner, starting family and getting into a long-term relationship due to perceived dangerousness and the widespread stigma of mental illness. (2) Gendered experiences of marriageability: Compared to men, women with SMI experienced disproportionate levels of stigma which often continued after recovery. SMI affects marriageability for men with SMI, but mens' chances of finding a marital partner increases following treatment. For women in particular, impaired functioning negatively affects marriageability as ability to cook, care and clean was taken as the measure of suitability. (3) Acceptability of divorce and separation from a partner with SMI: Divorce or separation from a partner with SMI was considered mostly acceptable for men while women were mostly expected to stay married and care for a partner with SMI. For men, the transition from provider to dependent was often acceptable. However, women who fail to execute their domestic roles successfully were considered inept and would be sent back to their family of origin. Women with SMI or those married to partners with SMI are at greater disadvantage. Reducing vulnerabilities through stigma reduction efforts such as community outreach and mental health awareness raising programs might contribute for better social outcomes for women with SMI.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
For women in most low- and middle-income countries, the diagnosis with serious mental illness (SMI) leads to stigma and challenges related to starting or maintaining marriages. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore perspectives on marriage, divorce and family roles of women with SMI in rural Ethiopia.
METHODS
A qualitative study was conducted in a rural setting of Butajira, South Central Ethiopia. A total of 39 in-depth interviews were carried out with service users (n = 11), caregivers (n = 12), religious leaders (n = 6), health extension workers (n = 4), police officers (n = 2), teachers (n = 2) and government officials (n = 2). Data were analyzed using a thematic approach.
RESULTS
Three themes emerged. (1) Marriage and SMI: Chances of getting married for individuals with SMI in general was perceived to be lower: Individuals with SMI experienced various challenges including difficulty finding romantic partner, starting family and getting into a long-term relationship due to perceived dangerousness and the widespread stigma of mental illness. (2) Gendered experiences of marriageability: Compared to men, women with SMI experienced disproportionate levels of stigma which often continued after recovery. SMI affects marriageability for men with SMI, but mens' chances of finding a marital partner increases following treatment. For women in particular, impaired functioning negatively affects marriageability as ability to cook, care and clean was taken as the measure of suitability. (3) Acceptability of divorce and separation from a partner with SMI: Divorce or separation from a partner with SMI was considered mostly acceptable for men while women were mostly expected to stay married and care for a partner with SMI. For men, the transition from provider to dependent was often acceptable. However, women who fail to execute their domestic roles successfully were considered inept and would be sent back to their family of origin.
CONCLUSION
Women with SMI or those married to partners with SMI are at greater disadvantage. Reducing vulnerabilities through stigma reduction efforts such as community outreach and mental health awareness raising programs might contribute for better social outcomes for women with SMI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31655561
doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2290-5
pii: 10.1186/s12888-019-2290-5
pmc: PMC6815356
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
315Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : U19 MH110001
Pays : United States
Références
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2009 Apr 28;5:8
pubmed: 19397834
Lancet. 2011 Oct 22;378(9801):1502-14
pubmed: 22008425
Lancet. 2009 Jan 31;373(9661):408-15
pubmed: 19162314
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Aug 22;11:138
pubmed: 21859455
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2004 Aug 20;4(1):3
pubmed: 15320952
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2008 May;42(5):389-95
pubmed: 18473257
Ethiop Med J. 2008 Jan;46(1):87-91
pubmed: 18711994
Schizophr Res. 2014 Jan;152(1):275-82
pubmed: 24275579
Ethiop Med J. 2012 Apr;50(2):125-33
pubmed: 22924281
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jul 26;15(1):121
pubmed: 27460038
Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;206(4):289-96
pubmed: 25657358
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008 Nov;22(6):569-74
pubmed: 19000295
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Jul;43(1):113-23
pubmed: 8816016
Schizophr Bull. 2009 May;35(3):646-54
pubmed: 18448478
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004 Nov;192(11):734-44
pubmed: 15505517
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Aug;28(4):397-407
pubmed: 29143723
Ethiop Med J. 2004 Oct;42(4):289-97
pubmed: 16122121
Schizophr Res. 2004 Aug 1;69(2-3):133-41
pubmed: 15469186
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2001 Jun;36(6):299-303
pubmed: 11583460
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Dec;53(11):1525-39
pubmed: 11710427
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;181:494-8
pubmed: 12456519
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;24(5):467-82
pubmed: 23057983
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Aug 29;16(1):156
pubmed: 28851421
Reprod Health. 2011 Dec 08;8:37
pubmed: 22151888
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;49(3):233-40
pubmed: 14626366
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):533-44
pubmed: 24193818
Soc Sci Med. 1995 May;40(9):1291-8
pubmed: 7610434
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 10;16:197
pubmed: 27287452
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2013 Sep 03;7(1):21
pubmed: 24004512
Scand J Public Health. 2008 Jun;36(4):436-41
pubmed: 18539699
BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Dec 29;12:239
pubmed: 23272796
Glob Health Action. 2010 Feb 25;3:null
pubmed: 20200660
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2014 Feb 21;14:2
pubmed: 24555444
Psychol Health Med. 2006 Aug;11(3):277-87
pubmed: 17130065
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003 Oct;38(10):586-92
pubmed: 14564386