Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in Focal Liver Lesions (FLL) with inconclusive findings on cross-sectional imaging.


Journal

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation
ISSN: 1875-8622
Titre abrégé: Clin Hemorheol Microcirc
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9709206

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
pubmed: 29 10 2019
medline: 8 7 2020
entrez: 29 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been used as an additional imaging technique in order to evaluate focal liver lesions. CEUS is easy and fast to perform, overcomes the limitations of B-mode US. To evaluate the diagnostic potential of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in focal liver lesions (FLL) with unclear findings on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this single-center retrospective study, 146 patients with at least one FLL underwent additional CEUS of the liver to clarify inconclusive cross-sectional imaging findings. Ultrasonography was performed using B-mode imaging and CEUS after injection of sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles (second-generation contrast agent) within two months after ceMRI or ceCT and interpreted by an experienced radiologist (EFSUMB level 3). Histopathological reports, long-term follow-up or clinical course served as reference standard. Thirty-eight of the 146 patients had malignant and 108 benign FLL. Overall, CEUS had 92% sensitivity (95% -CI, 79-97) and 98% specificity (95% -CI, 93-99) with an AUC of 0.95 in correctly characterizing the lesion as malignant or benign. Sensitivity increased to 98% (95% -CI, 96-100) for benign lesions and decreased to 92% (95% -CI, 78-98) for malignant lesions. CEUS showed the highest diagnostical accuracy in lesion <1 cm with an AUC of 1.000, while the lowest accuracy was achieved in lesions >2 cm with an AUC of 0.924 due to a decreasing specificity of 86% (95% -CI, 87-100). CEUS correctly distinguished malignant from benign FLL in cases with inconclusive cross-sectional imaging findings and achieved high levels of diagnostic accuracy. CEUS has added diagnostic value especially in small lesions ≤1 cm while specificity remains limited in larger lesions.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been used as an additional imaging technique in order to evaluate focal liver lesions. CEUS is easy and fast to perform, overcomes the limitations of B-mode US.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the diagnostic potential of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in focal liver lesions (FLL) with unclear findings on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS METHODS
In this single-center retrospective study, 146 patients with at least one FLL underwent additional CEUS of the liver to clarify inconclusive cross-sectional imaging findings. Ultrasonography was performed using B-mode imaging and CEUS after injection of sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles (second-generation contrast agent) within two months after ceMRI or ceCT and interpreted by an experienced radiologist (EFSUMB level 3). Histopathological reports, long-term follow-up or clinical course served as reference standard.
RESULTS RESULTS
Thirty-eight of the 146 patients had malignant and 108 benign FLL. Overall, CEUS had 92% sensitivity (95% -CI, 79-97) and 98% specificity (95% -CI, 93-99) with an AUC of 0.95 in correctly characterizing the lesion as malignant or benign. Sensitivity increased to 98% (95% -CI, 96-100) for benign lesions and decreased to 92% (95% -CI, 78-98) for malignant lesions. CEUS showed the highest diagnostical accuracy in lesion <1 cm with an AUC of 1.000, while the lowest accuracy was achieved in lesions >2 cm with an AUC of 0.924 due to a decreasing specificity of 86% (95% -CI, 87-100).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
CEUS correctly distinguished malignant from benign FLL in cases with inconclusive cross-sectional imaging findings and achieved high levels of diagnostic accuracy. CEUS has added diagnostic value especially in small lesions ≤1 cm while specificity remains limited in larger lesions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31658052
pii: CH190718
doi: 10.3233/CH-190718
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contrast Media 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

327-339

Auteurs

Timo Alexander Auer (TA)

Department of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany.

Thomas Fischer (T)

Department of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany.

Stephan Rodrigo Marticorena Garcia (SRM)

Department of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany.

Tobias Penzkofer (T)

Department of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany.
Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.

Ernst-Michael Jung (EM)

University Medical Center Regensburg, Department of Radiology, Regensburg, Germany.

Bernd Hamm (B)

Department of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany.

Markus Herbert Lerchbaumer (MH)

Department of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH