Global imprint of mycorrhizal fungi on whole-plant nutrient economics.


Journal

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 11 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 30 10 2019
medline: 2 4 2020
entrez: 30 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Mycorrhizal fungi are critical members of the plant microbiome, forming a symbiosis with the roots of most plants on Earth. Most plant species partner with either arbuscular or ectomycorrhizal fungi, and these symbioses are thought to represent plant adaptations to fast and slow soil nutrient cycling rates. This generates a second hypothesis, that arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal plant species traits complement and reinforce these fungal strategies, resulting in nutrient acquisitive vs. conservative plant trait profiles. Here we analyzed 17,764 species level trait observations from 2,940 woody plant species to show that mycorrhizal plants differ systematically in nitrogen and phosphorus economic traits. Differences were clearest in temperate latitudes, where ectomycorrhizal plant species are more nitrogen use- and phosphorus use-conservative than arbuscular mycorrhizal species. This difference is reflected in both aboveground and belowground plant traits and is robust to controlling for evolutionary history, nitrogen fixation ability, deciduousness, latitude, and species climate niche. Furthermore, mycorrhizal effects are large and frequently similar to or greater in magnitude than the influence of plant nitrogen fixation ability or deciduous vs. evergreen leaf habit. Ectomycorrhizal plants are also more nitrogen conservative than arbuscular plants in boreal and tropical ecosystems, although differences in phosphorus use are less apparent outside temperate latitudes. Our findings bolster current theories of ecosystems rooted in mycorrhizal ecology and support the hypothesis that plant mycorrhizal association is linked to the evolution of plant nutrient economic strategies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31659035
pii: 1906655116
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906655116
pmc: PMC6859366
doi:

Substances chimiques

Phosphorus 27YLU75U4W
Nitrogen N762921K75

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

23163-23168

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no competing interest.

Références

Science. 2013 Mar 29;339(6127):1615-8
pubmed: 23539604
New Phytol. 2012 Nov;196(3):845-852
pubmed: 22966750
Evolution. 2000 Oct;54(5):1480-92
pubmed: 11108577
New Phytol. 2009 Jun;182(4):919-928
pubmed: 19383105
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Oct;24(10):4544-4553
pubmed: 30051940
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 9;115(41):10392-10397
pubmed: 30254167
Oecologia. 2001 Dec;129(4):611-619
pubmed: 24577702
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39597
pubmed: 22815710
New Phytol. 2008;180(2):263-265
pubmed: 19138216
Nature. 2019 May;569(7756):404-408
pubmed: 31092941
New Phytol. 2017 Sep;215(4):1562-1573
pubmed: 28440574
Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):821-7
pubmed: 15103368
Ecol Lett. 2019 Jun;22(6):946-953
pubmed: 30891910
Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jun;14(6):1477-87
pubmed: 22469289
Am Nat. 2011 Jul;178(1):E10-7
pubmed: 21670572
New Phytol. 2003 Mar;157(3):475-492
pubmed: 33873410
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Mar;22(3):1299-314
pubmed: 26473512
New Phytol. 2015 Mar;205(4):1406-1423
pubmed: 25639293
New Phytol. 2013 Jul;199(1):41-51
pubmed: 23713553
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 27;101(30):11001-6
pubmed: 15213326
Sci Adv. 2019 Apr 10;5(4):eaav6358
pubmed: 30989116
Am Nat. 2002 Dec;160(6):712-26
pubmed: 18707460
New Phytol. 2017 Feb;213(3):1440-1451
pubmed: 27678253
Ecol Lett. 2018 May;21(5):734-744
pubmed: 29569818
Am Nat. 2001 Feb;157(2):141-53
pubmed: 18707268
New Phytol. 2018 Jan;217(2):507-522
pubmed: 29105765
New Phytol. 2017 Feb;213(3):996-999
pubmed: 28079936
Nat Genet. 2015 Apr;47(4):410-5
pubmed: 25706625
Ecol Evol. 2014 Aug;4(15):2979-90
pubmed: 25247056
New Phytol. 2016 Mar;209(4):1705-19
pubmed: 26527297
ISME J. 2019 Aug;13(8):1891-1898
pubmed: 30911130

Auteurs

Colin Averill (C)

Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215; colin.averill@usys.ethz.ch.
Department of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215.
Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.

Jennifer M Bhatnagar (JM)

Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215.

Michael C Dietze (MC)

Department of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215.

William D Pearse (WD)

Department of Biology and Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322.

Stephanie N Kivlin (SN)

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Lakes Salinity Archaea Bacteria Microbiota
Rivers Turkey Biodiversity Environmental Monitoring Animals
1.00
Iran Environmental Monitoring Seasons Ecosystem Forests

Classifications MeSH