A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures.
Human Development Index
counterfactual
human footprint
impact assessment
management effectiveness
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 11 2019
12 11 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
30
10
2019
medline:
2
4
2020
entrez:
30
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
One-sixth of the global terrestrial surface now falls within protected areas (PAs), making it essential to understand how far they mitigate the increasing pressures on nature which characterize the Anthropocene. In by far the largest analysis of this question to date and not restricted to forested PAs, we compiled data from 12,315 PAs across 152 countries to investigate their ability to reduce human pressure and how this varies with socioeconomic and management circumstances. While many PAs show positive outcomes, strikingly we find that compared with matched unprotected areas, PAs have on average not reduced a compound index of pressure change over the past 15 y. Moreover, in tropical regions average pressure change from cropland conversion has increased inside PAs even more than in matched unprotected areas. However, our results also confirm previous studies restricted to forest PAs, where pressures are increasing, but less than in counterfactual areas. Our results also show that countries with high national-level development scores have experienced lower rates of pressure increase over the past 15 y within their PAs compared with a matched outside area. Our results caution against the rapid establishment of new PAs without simultaneously addressing the conditions needed to enable their success.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31659036
pii: 1908221116
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908221116
pmc: PMC6859326
doi:
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.p8cz8w9kf']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23209-23215Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interest.
Références
Science. 2016 Apr 22;352(6284):416-8
pubmed: 27102469
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 30;10(7):e0129460
pubmed: 26225922
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 12;7(1):11318
pubmed: 28900182
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 5;370(1681):null
pubmed: 26460133
Science. 2004 Nov 12;306(5699):1146-9
pubmed: 15539593
Conserv Biol. 2019 Aug;33(4):821-831
pubmed: 30461056
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 7;278(1712):1633-8
pubmed: 21084351
Nature. 2018 Jan 11;553(7687):199-202
pubmed: 29258291
Science. 2017 Apr 21;356(6335):270-275
pubmed: 28428393
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011 Mar 13;369(1938):842-67
pubmed: 21282150
Conserv Biol. 2016 Feb;30(1):133-41
pubmed: 26096222
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 26;110(13):4956-61
pubmed: 23479648
Conserv Biol. 2014 Dec;28(6):1604-16
pubmed: 25052712
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 27;115(9):2084-2089
pubmed: 29440424
Nature. 2011 Sep 14;478(7369):378-81
pubmed: 21918513
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 Jul;1399(1):42-60
pubmed: 27589395
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 May 6;105(18):6673-8
pubmed: 18451028
Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):220-7
pubmed: 10821282
Science. 2018 May 18;360(6390):788-791
pubmed: 29773750
Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):290-4
pubmed: 22832582
Stat Sci. 2010 Feb 1;25(1):1-21
pubmed: 20871802
Nature. 2017 Nov 16;551(7680):364-367
pubmed: 29072294
Bioscience. 2017 Jun 1;67(6):534-545
pubmed: 28608869
Nat Commun. 2016 Sep 01;7:12747
pubmed: 27582180
Nature. 2003 Nov 6;426(6962):67-70
pubmed: 14603318
Nature. 2014 Nov 6;515(7525):67-73
pubmed: 25373676
PLoS One. 2009 Dec 14;4(12):e8273
pubmed: 20011603