Real-world management and long-term outcomes of diabetic macular oedema with good visual acuity.
Journal
Eye (London, England)
ISSN: 1476-5454
Titre abrégé: Eye (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8703986
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
08
07
2019
accepted:
09
09
2019
pubmed:
30
10
2019
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
30
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the management and long-term outcomes of patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and good initial visual acuity in real-world settings. We reviewed 122 eyes of 100 patients with treatment-naive DMO and initial best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/25 or better. We assessed clinical characteristics, logMAR BCVA, central subfield thickness (CST), cumulative intravitreal injections and laser treatments at yearly intervals, and characteristics at time of initial treatment. Linear mixed effects models were used to identify predictors of visual outcomes. At presentation, mean BCVA was 0.057 ± 0.048 logMAR (Snellen 20/23) and mean CST was 288 ± 57 μm. After a median follow-up of 3 years, 51% of eyes underwent treatment. More eyes underwent intravitreal injection as initial treatment (54%), but lasers were initiated at an earlier time and at better BCVA. Final BCVA was associated with better BCVA (P < 0.001) and earlier timing (P = 0.017) at initial treatment, but not CST at first treatment (P = 0.634) or cumulative number of injections or lasers (P = 0.441-0.606). DMO with good initial visual acuity should be monitored closely, as delay in treatment initiation is associated with worse visual outcomes. BCVA at time of initial treatment is the strongest determinant of final visual acuity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31659287
doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0647-0
pii: 10.1038/s41433-019-0647-0
pmc: PMC7253473
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1108-1115Subventions
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : K08 EY027463
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : R21 EY031108
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : K08 EY026101
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001860
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 EY026876
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : U24 EY029904
Pays : United States
Références
Klein R, et al. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. IV. Diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:1464–74.
doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(84)34102-1
Todorich B, Yiu G, Hahn P. Current and investigational pharmacotherapeutic approaches for modulating retinal angiogenesis. Expert Rev Clin Pharm. 2014;7:375–91.
doi: 10.1586/17512433.2014.890047
Lois N, et al. Diabetic macular oedema and diode subthreshold micropulse laser (DIAMONDS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2019;20:122.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3199-5
Chen G, et al. Subthreshold micropulse diode laser versus conventional laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Retina. 2016;36:2059–65.
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001053
Moisseiev E, et al. Subthreshold micropulse laser reduces anti-VEGF injection burden in patients with diabetic macular edema. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28:68–73.
doi: 10.5301/ejo.5001000
Vujosevic S, et al. Subthreshold micropulse yellow laser versus subthreshold micropulse infrared laser in center-involving diabetic macular edema: morphologic and functional safety. Retina. 2015;35:1594–603.
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000521
Hagenau F, et al. Vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema: optical coherence tomography criteria and pathology of the vitreomacular interface. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;200:34–46.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.12.004
Hu XY, et al. Efficacy and safety of vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for diabetic macular edema: a Meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11:1848–55.
pubmed: 30450318
pmcid: 6232319
Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research N. et al. Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1064–77 e1035.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.031
Nguyen QD, et al. Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:789–801.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.039
Heier JS, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema: 148-week results from the VISTA and VIVID studies. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:2376–85.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.032
Korobelnik JF, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2247–54.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.006
Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research N. et al. Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. New Engl J Med. 2015;372:1193–203.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414264
Wells JA, et al. Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: two-year results from a comparative effectiveness randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1351–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.02.022
Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:1796–806.
doi: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050120030015
Baker CW, et al. Effect of initial management with aflibercept vs laser photocoagulation vs observation on vision loss among patients with diabetic macular edema involving the center of the macula and good visual acuity: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321:1880–94.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5790
Yiu G, et al. Effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy on choroidal thickness in diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:745–51 e742.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.06.006
Moisseiev E, et al. 25-gauge vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane and internal limiting membrane peeling in eyes with very good visual acuity. Curr eye Res. 2016;41:1387–92.
doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1114654