The SMART IRB platform: A national resource for IRB review for multisite studies.

IRB authorization agreement Institutional review boards NIH single IRB policy bioethics cede review cooperative agreement human subject protections master IRB agreements multicenter clinical research reliance agreement research ethics sIRB single IRB review

Journal

Journal of clinical and translational science
ISSN: 2059-8661
Titre abrégé: J Clin Transl Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101689953

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Historique:
received: 06 05 2019
revised: 17 06 2019
accepted: 23 06 2019
entrez: 30 10 2019
pubmed: 30 10 2019
medline: 30 10 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Single institutional review board (IRB) review of multisite research increased in frequency over a decade ago with a proliferation of master IRB reliance agreements supporting statewide and regional consortia and disease- and population-specific networks. Although successful, the increasing number of agreements presented significant challenges and illuminated potential benefits of a single, nationwide agreement. Anticipated changes in federal regulations highlighted the need to systematize and simplify IRB reliance. To address these challenges, the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences funded a project to establish a national IRB reliance network that would support national adoption of single IRB (sIRB) review. The Streamlined, Multisite, Accelerated Resources for Trials (SMART) IRB Platform launched in July 2016 to facilitate dissemination, adoption, and implementation of a collaboratively developed master IRB reliance agreement and supportive tools and resources. More than 580 institutions have joined SMART IRB's Master Common Reciprocal Institutional Review Board Authorization Agreement and begun using the SMART IRB platform to support sIRB arrangements. Here, we describe the tenets of the agreement and operational benefits and challenges of its use. SMART IRB's early success affirms the utility of collaborative, flexible, and centralized approaches to supporting sIRB review while highlighting the need for further national harmonization.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31660237
doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.394
pii: 00394
pmc: PMC6798516
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

129-139

Subventions

Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001086
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001102
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002373
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002541
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2019.

Références

N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 21;363(17):1591-3
pubmed: 20942660
Milbank Q. 2011 Dec;89(4):599-627
pubmed: 22188349
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Jun;6(3):176-8
pubmed: 23751020
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Feb;8(1):57-66
pubmed: 25196592

Auteurs

Nichelle Cobb (N)

Health Sciences IRBs Office, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Elizabeth Witte (E)

Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Maria Cervone (M)

Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Aaron Kirby (A)

Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Douglas MacFadden (D)

Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Lee Nadler (L)

Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Barbara E Bierer (BE)

Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Classifications MeSH