Targeting CXCR4 potentiates anti-PD-1 efficacy modifying the tumor microenvironment and inhibiting neoplastic PD-1.
Immune privilege
MDSC; CXCR4-CXCL12 pathway
Treg
Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes
Tumor intrinsic PD-1 pathway
Tumor microenvironment
Journal
Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR
ISSN: 1756-9966
Titre abrégé: J Exp Clin Cancer Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8308647
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Oct 2019
28 Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
30
05
2019
accepted:
10
09
2019
entrez:
30
10
2019
pubmed:
30
10
2019
medline:
11
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Inefficient T-cell access to the tumor microenvironment (TME) is among the causes of tumor immune-resistance. Previous evidence demonstrated that targeting CXCR4 improves anti-PD-1/PD-L1 efficacy reshaping TME. To evaluate the role of newly developed CXCR4 antagonists (PCT/IB2011/000120/ EP2528936B1/US2013/0079292A1) in potentiating anti-PD-1 efficacy two syngeneic murine models, the MC38 colon cancer and the B16 melanoma-human CXCR4-transduced, were employed. Mice were subcutaneously injected with MC38 (1 × 10 The combined treatment, Pep R plus anti-PD-1, reduced the MC38 Relative Tumor Volume (RTV) by 2.67 fold (p = 0.038) while nor anti-PD-1, neither Pep R significantly impacted on tumor growth. Significant higher number of Granzyme B (GZMB) positive cells was detected in MC38 tumors from mice treated with the combined treatment (p = 0.016) while anti-PD-1 determined a modest but significant increase of tumor-infiltrating GZMB positive cells (p = 0.035). Also, a lower number of FoxP3 positive cells was detected (p = 0.022). In the B16-hCXCR4 tumors, two weeks of combined treatment reduced tumor volume by 2.27 fold while nor anti-PD-1 neither Pep R significantly impacted on tumor growth. A significant higher number of GRZB positive cells was observed in B16-hCXCR4 tumors treated with combined treatment (p = 0,0015) as compared to anti-PD-1 (p = 0.028). The combined treatment reduced CXCR4, CXCL12 and PD-L1 expression in MC38 tumors. In addition, flow cytometry on fresh B16-hCXCR4 tumors showed significantly higher Tregs number following anti-PD-1 partially reversed by the combined treatment Pep R and anti-PD-1. Combined treatment determined an increase of CD8/Tregs and CD8/MDSC ratio. To dissect the effect of anti-PD-1 and CXCR4 targeting on PD-1 expressed by human cancer cells, PES43 human melanoma xenograft model was employed. In vitro human anti-PD-1 nivolumab or pembrolizumab (10 μM) reduced PES43 cells growth while nivolumab (10 μM) inhibited pERK1/2, P38 MAPK, pAKT and p4EBP. PES43 xenograft mice were treated with Pep R54, a newly developed Pep R derivative (AcHN-Arg-Ala-[DCys-Arg- Nal(2')-His-Pen]- COOH), plus nivolumab. After 3 weeks of combined treatment a significant reduction in tumor growth was shown (p = 0.038). PES43 lung disseminated tumor cells (DTC) were detected in fresh lung tissues as melanoma positive MCSP-APC Combined treatment with the new developed CXCR4 antagonist, Pep R, plus anti-PD-1, reduced tumor-growth in two syngeneic murine models, anti-PD-1 sensitive and resistant, potentiating Granzyme and reducing Foxp3 cells infiltration. In addition, the human specific CXCR4 antagonist, Pep R54, cooperated with nivolumab in inhibiting the growth of the PD-1 expressing human PES43 melanoma xenograft. This evidence sheds light on PD-1 targeting mechanisms and paves the way for CXCR4/PD-1 targeting combination therapy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Inefficient T-cell access to the tumor microenvironment (TME) is among the causes of tumor immune-resistance. Previous evidence demonstrated that targeting CXCR4 improves anti-PD-1/PD-L1 efficacy reshaping TME. To evaluate the role of newly developed CXCR4 antagonists (PCT/IB2011/000120/ EP2528936B1/US2013/0079292A1) in potentiating anti-PD-1 efficacy two syngeneic murine models, the MC38 colon cancer and the B16 melanoma-human CXCR4-transduced, were employed.
METHODS
METHODS
Mice were subcutaneously injected with MC38 (1 × 10
RESULTS
RESULTS
The combined treatment, Pep R plus anti-PD-1, reduced the MC38 Relative Tumor Volume (RTV) by 2.67 fold (p = 0.038) while nor anti-PD-1, neither Pep R significantly impacted on tumor growth. Significant higher number of Granzyme B (GZMB) positive cells was detected in MC38 tumors from mice treated with the combined treatment (p = 0.016) while anti-PD-1 determined a modest but significant increase of tumor-infiltrating GZMB positive cells (p = 0.035). Also, a lower number of FoxP3 positive cells was detected (p = 0.022). In the B16-hCXCR4 tumors, two weeks of combined treatment reduced tumor volume by 2.27 fold while nor anti-PD-1 neither Pep R significantly impacted on tumor growth. A significant higher number of GRZB positive cells was observed in B16-hCXCR4 tumors treated with combined treatment (p = 0,0015) as compared to anti-PD-1 (p = 0.028). The combined treatment reduced CXCR4, CXCL12 and PD-L1 expression in MC38 tumors. In addition, flow cytometry on fresh B16-hCXCR4 tumors showed significantly higher Tregs number following anti-PD-1 partially reversed by the combined treatment Pep R and anti-PD-1. Combined treatment determined an increase of CD8/Tregs and CD8/MDSC ratio. To dissect the effect of anti-PD-1 and CXCR4 targeting on PD-1 expressed by human cancer cells, PES43 human melanoma xenograft model was employed. In vitro human anti-PD-1 nivolumab or pembrolizumab (10 μM) reduced PES43 cells growth while nivolumab (10 μM) inhibited pERK1/2, P38 MAPK, pAKT and p4EBP. PES43 xenograft mice were treated with Pep R54, a newly developed Pep R derivative (AcHN-Arg-Ala-[DCys-Arg- Nal(2')-His-Pen]- COOH), plus nivolumab. After 3 weeks of combined treatment a significant reduction in tumor growth was shown (p = 0.038). PES43 lung disseminated tumor cells (DTC) were detected in fresh lung tissues as melanoma positive MCSP-APC
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Combined treatment with the new developed CXCR4 antagonist, Pep R, plus anti-PD-1, reduced tumor-growth in two syngeneic murine models, anti-PD-1 sensitive and resistant, potentiating Granzyme and reducing Foxp3 cells infiltration. In addition, the human specific CXCR4 antagonist, Pep R54, cooperated with nivolumab in inhibiting the growth of the PD-1 expressing human PES43 melanoma xenograft. This evidence sheds light on PD-1 targeting mechanisms and paves the way for CXCR4/PD-1 targeting combination therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31661001
doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1420-8
pii: 10.1186/s13046-019-1420-8
pmc: PMC6819555
doi:
Substances chimiques
CXCR4 protein, mouse
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
0
Receptors, CXCR4
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
432Subventions
Organisme : TRANSCAN-2
ID : 643638
Références
Am J Pathol. 2010 Mar;176(3):1469-83
pubmed: 20110411
Cell. 2017 Feb 9;168(4):707-723
pubmed: 28187290
Cancer Immunol Res. 2018 Oct;6(10):1186-1198
pubmed: 30108045
Nanoscale. 2016 Apr 14;8(14):7562-71
pubmed: 26983756
J Biopharm Stat. 2010 Sep;20(5):954-64
pubmed: 20721784
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 12;7(28):43039-43051
pubmed: 27343548
Cancer Res. 2017 May 1;77(9):2318-2327
pubmed: 28461564
Blood Adv. 2017 May 08;1(12):753-765
pubmed: 29296719
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 13;8(9):e74548
pubmed: 24058588
Clin Transl Immunology. 2015 Jan 09;4(1):e30
pubmed: 25671128
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 10;110(50):20212-7
pubmed: 24277834
Cancer Immunol Res. 2017 Nov;5(11):950-956
pubmed: 28963140
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Mar 25;35:55
pubmed: 27015814
Front Immunol. 2018 Jul 30;9:1774
pubmed: 30105035
J Leukoc Biol. 2013 Mar;93(3):343-52
pubmed: 23136258
Mol Cancer Ther. 2018 Apr;17(4):869-882
pubmed: 29483207
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 2;107(9):4275-80
pubmed: 20160101
Nat Rev Immunol. 2009 Mar;9(3):162-74
pubmed: 19197294
Front Physiol. 2018 Feb 20;9:113
pubmed: 29515456
Cancer Res. 2015 Sep 15;75(18):3800-11
pubmed: 26208901
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;174(3):679-691
pubmed: 30632021
J Control Release. 2014 Dec 28;196:324-31
pubmed: 25450404
FASEB J. 2019 May;33(5):6596-6608
pubmed: 30802149
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 5;116(10):4558-4566
pubmed: 30700545
Cancer Res. 2011 Aug 15;71(16):5522-5534
pubmed: 21742774
Cancer Immunol Res. 2015 Feb;3(2):149-60
pubmed: 25387892
Front Immunol. 2018 Feb 23;9:353
pubmed: 29527212
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Apr 15;12(8):2427-33
pubmed: 16638848
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 19;8(44):77110-77120
pubmed: 29100374
Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 Oct;4(10):845-857
pubmed: 27589875
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):74-80
pubmed: 25838376
Hepatology. 2015 May;61(5):1591-602
pubmed: 25529917
Front Immunol. 2018 Oct 09;9:2100
pubmed: 30356816
J Med Chem. 2017 Dec 14;60(23):9641-9652
pubmed: 29125295
J Immunol. 2018 Oct 15;201(8):2273-2286
pubmed: 30209192
J Clin Invest. 2006 Jul;116(7):1935-45
pubmed: 16778987
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Oct 1;21(19):4278-85
pubmed: 26199389
Int J Oncol. 2015 Mar;46(3):1232-42
pubmed: 25572953
Sci Rep. 2017 May 31;7(1):2554
pubmed: 28566721
Cell Rep. 2017 May 9;19(6):1189-1201
pubmed: 28494868
Hepatology. 2017 Dec;66(6):1920-1933
pubmed: 28732118
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 14;116(20):9999-10008
pubmed: 31028147
Cell. 2015 Sep 10;162(6):1242-56
pubmed: 26359984
Science. 2018 Mar 23;359(6382):1350-1355
pubmed: 29567705
J Med Chem. 2016 Sep 22;59(18):8369-80
pubmed: 27571038
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Mar 29;11(4):null
pubmed: 30934955
Cancer Immunol Res. 2017 Jan;5(1):29-41
pubmed: 27923825
Cancer Lett. 2016 Jan 1;370(1):100-7
pubmed: 26517945