Advancing Environmental Health Literacy: Validated Scales of General Environmental Health and Environmental Media-Specific Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviors.
Adult
Air
Decision Making
Environment
Environmental Exposure
/ adverse effects
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Food Supply
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Literacy
/ standards
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
/ standards
Water Supply
air
attitudes
behaviors
community–academic partnerships
environmental health literacy
food
knowledge
scale development
water
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 10 2019
28 10 2019
Historique:
received:
17
09
2019
revised:
17
10
2019
accepted:
24
10
2019
entrez:
31
10
2019
pubmed:
31
10
2019
medline:
17
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Environmental health literacy (EHL) involves understanding and using environmental information to make decisions about health. This study developed a validated survey instrument with four scales for assessing media-specific (i.e., air, food, water) and general EHL. The four scales were created as follows: 1) item generation: environmental health scientists and statisticians developed an initial set of items in three domains: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors; 2) item review: items were reviewed for face validity; 3) validation: 174 public health students, the exploratory sample, and 98 community members, the test sample, validated the scales. The scales' factor structure was based on exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and model fit was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For each scale, the final EFA resulted in an independent three-factor solution for knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Good fit for the three-factor structure was observed. Model fit for CFA was generally confirmed with fit indices. The scales showed internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha from 0.63 to 0.70. The 42-item instrument represents an important contribution towards assessing EHL and is designed to enable meaningful engagement between researchers and community members about environmental health. The intended outcome is sustained community-academic partnerships benefiting research design, implementation, translation, dissemination, and community action.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31661913
pii: ijerph16214157
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214157
pmc: PMC6862096
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Références
Proc R Soc Med. 1965 May;58:295-300
pubmed: 14283879
Int J Nurs Clin Pract. 2016;3:
pubmed: 28890934
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Nov;123(11):1095-9
pubmed: 25910282
J Psychosom Res. 2006 Jul;61(1):71-9
pubmed: 16813848
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 07;15(3):
pubmed: 29518955
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2016 Jul;36(4):231-240
pubmed: 27431602
Health Educ Behav. 2001 Aug;28(4):462-86
pubmed: 11465157
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Apr;125(4):495-501
pubmed: 26126293
Public Health Nurs. 2009 Sep-Oct;26(5):460-73
pubmed: 19706129
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016 Oct-Dec;52(4):516-523
pubmed: 27999222
J Environ Stud Sci. 2016 Sep;6(3):543-555
pubmed: 27595054
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 Dec;152(12):1213-8
pubmed: 9856432
J Environ Health. 2015 Apr;77(8):22-8
pubmed: 25876262
Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Mar;120(3):326-31
pubmed: 22147336