Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula.
Journal
Journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 2090-004X
Titre abrégé: J Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101524199
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
05
01
2019
revised:
17
08
2019
accepted:
05
09
2019
entrez:
31
10
2019
pubmed:
31
10
2019
medline:
31
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To compare the preoperative measurements of the anterior chamber depth (ACD) by the IOLMaster and Catalys; additionally, to compare the accuracy of the IOL power calculated by the Barrett Universal II formula using the two different measurements. University of California, Irvine, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute in Irvine, California. Retrospective comparative study. This study included 144 eyes of 90 patients with a mean age of 72.0 years (range 40.8 to 92.1 years) that underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using Catalys. Preoperative measurements of ACD were taken by the IOLMaster and Catalys. Manifest refraction and refractive spherical equivalent were measured 1 month postoperatively. Expected refractive results were compared with actual postoperative refractive results. The correlation between the ACD values from the two devices was good ( The Catalys biometry yielded a significantly larger ACD value than the IOLMaster. This difference in ACD value, however, did not reflect in a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation and refractive prediction error using the Barrett Universal II Formula.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31662898
doi: 10.1155/2019/8172615
pmc: PMC6778875
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
8172615Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Hannah Muniz Castro et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Apr;57(4):1885-91
pubmed: 27082304
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Aug;42(8):1157-64
pubmed: 27531292
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Nov;41(11):2387-93
pubmed: 26703487
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Apr;40(4):593-600
pubmed: 24680520
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;98(9):1277-81
pubmed: 24795336
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 Aug;85(5):472-85
pubmed: 17403024
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 May-Jun;43(4):328-34
pubmed: 25491591
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Mar;34(3):368-76
pubmed: 18299059
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1189-98
pubmed: 21700099
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Aug;42(8):1165-72
pubmed: 27531293
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Mar;37(3):513-7
pubmed: 21244866
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Oct;42(10):1490-1500
pubmed: 27839605
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2016 Dec;39(10):859-865
pubmed: 27793471
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;100(9):1201-5
pubmed: 26674777
Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;93(6):807-10
pubmed: 19289385
Ophthalmology. 2009 Nov;116(11):2087-92
pubmed: 19744720
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Feb;34(2):262-7
pubmed: 18242451
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul-Aug;25(4):309-14
pubmed: 25655597
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;36(2):230-4
pubmed: 20152602
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Aug;41(8):1678-84
pubmed: 26432125
Int Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;35(6):853-9
pubmed: 25807912