Impact of merging commercial breeding lines on the genetic diversity of Landrace pigs.


Journal

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
ISSN: 1297-9686
Titre abrégé: Genet Sel Evol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9114088

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 07 03 2019
accepted: 16 10 2019
entrez: 31 10 2019
pubmed: 31 10 2019
medline: 11 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The pig breeding industry has undergone a large number of mergers in the past decades. Various commercial lines were merged or discontinued, which is expected to reduce the genetic diversity of the pig species. The objective of the current study was to investigate the genetic diversity of different former Dutch Landrace breeding lines and quantify their relationship with the current Dutch Landrace breed that originated from these lines. Principal component analysis clearly divided the former Landrace lines into two main clusters, which are represented by Norwegian/Finnish Landrace lines and Dutch Landrace lines. Structure analysis revealed that each of the lines that are present in the Dutch Gene bank has a unique genetic identity. The current Dutch Landrace breed shows a high level of admixture and is closely related to the six former lines. The Dumeco N-line, which is conserved in the Dutch Gene bank, is poorly represented in the current Dutch Landrace. All seven lines (the six former and the current line) contribute almost equally to the genetic diversity of the Dutch Landrace breed. As expected, the current Dutch Landrace breed comprises only a small proportion of unique genetic diversity that was not present in the other lines. The genetic diversity level, as measured by Eding's core set method, was equal to 0.89 for the current Dutch Landrace breed, whereas total genetic diversity across the seven lines, measured by the same method, was equal to 0.99. The current Dutch Landrace breed shows a high level of admixture and is closely related to the six former Dutch Landrace lines. Merging of commercial Landrace lines has reduced the genetic diversity of the Landrace population in the Netherlands, although a large proportion of the original variation is maintained. Thus, our recommendation is to conserve breeding lines in a gene bank before they are merged.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The pig breeding industry has undergone a large number of mergers in the past decades. Various commercial lines were merged or discontinued, which is expected to reduce the genetic diversity of the pig species. The objective of the current study was to investigate the genetic diversity of different former Dutch Landrace breeding lines and quantify their relationship with the current Dutch Landrace breed that originated from these lines.
RESULTS RESULTS
Principal component analysis clearly divided the former Landrace lines into two main clusters, which are represented by Norwegian/Finnish Landrace lines and Dutch Landrace lines. Structure analysis revealed that each of the lines that are present in the Dutch Gene bank has a unique genetic identity. The current Dutch Landrace breed shows a high level of admixture and is closely related to the six former lines. The Dumeco N-line, which is conserved in the Dutch Gene bank, is poorly represented in the current Dutch Landrace. All seven lines (the six former and the current line) contribute almost equally to the genetic diversity of the Dutch Landrace breed. As expected, the current Dutch Landrace breed comprises only a small proportion of unique genetic diversity that was not present in the other lines. The genetic diversity level, as measured by Eding's core set method, was equal to 0.89 for the current Dutch Landrace breed, whereas total genetic diversity across the seven lines, measured by the same method, was equal to 0.99.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The current Dutch Landrace breed shows a high level of admixture and is closely related to the six former Dutch Landrace lines. Merging of commercial Landrace lines has reduced the genetic diversity of the Landrace population in the Netherlands, although a large proportion of the original variation is maintained. Thus, our recommendation is to conserve breeding lines in a gene bank before they are merged.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31664893
doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0502-6
pii: 10.1186/s12711-019-0502-6
pmc: PMC6819590
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

60

Références

Genet Sel Evol. 2003 Sep-Oct;35(5):533-57
pubmed: 12939204
BMC Genomics. 2013 Nov 13;14:784
pubmed: 24225222
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 11;105(45):17312-7
pubmed: 18981413
Zygote. 2013 Feb;21(1):31-51
pubmed: 22008281
Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25
pubmed: 3447015
G3 (Bethesda). 2018 Feb 2;8(2):377-383
pubmed: 29208649
Anim Genet. 2017 Feb;48(1):103-107
pubmed: 27593230
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Nov;100(11):9061-9075
pubmed: 28843688
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42649
pubmed: 22905157
Genet Mol Biol. 2014 Jun;37(2):330-42
pubmed: 25071397
Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2611-20
pubmed: 15969739
Int J Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 01;11(12):1348-62
pubmed: 26681915
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Feb 22;18(2):
pubmed: 28241430
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 26;13(10):e0206512
pubmed: 30365549
Int J Genomics. 2017;2017:6532837
pubmed: 28913347
BMC Genomics. 2014 Jul 16;15:601
pubmed: 25030608
Gigascience. 2020 Jun 1;9(6):
pubmed: 32543654
Anim Sci J. 2016 May;87(5):646-54
pubmed: 26425933
Anim Reprod Sci. 2010 Jul;120(1-4):1-9
pubmed: 20236775
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007 Jan;292(1):R207-16
pubmed: 16946080
BMC Genet. 2016 Jan 27;17 Suppl 1:15
pubmed: 26822294
J Anim Sci. 1999 Jan;77(1):61-9
pubmed: 10064028
Genet Mol Res. 2015 Dec 02;14(4):15668-82
pubmed: 26634535
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Jan;17(1):27-32
pubmed: 26850166
Genet Sel Evol. 2002 Sep-Oct;34(5):613-33
pubmed: 12427389
Nat Protoc. 2019 Mar;14(3):703-721
pubmed: 30804569
Front Genet. 2015 Jan 19;5:461
pubmed: 25646122
Heredity (Edinb). 2011 Feb;106(2):261-9
pubmed: 20551978
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019 May;32(5):607-613
pubmed: 30381738
Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59
pubmed: 10835412
Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370
pubmed: 28563791
Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 22;20(2):289-90
pubmed: 14734327
Nat Genet. 2010 Jul;42(7):565-9
pubmed: 20562875
Genetics. 2008 Oct;180(2):977-93
pubmed: 18780740
Bioinformatics. 2007 Jul 15;23(14):1801-6
pubmed: 17485429
Mol Ecol. 2018 Mar;27(6):1342-1356
pubmed: 29524276
Genetics. 2003 Aug;164(4):1567-87
pubmed: 12930761

Auteurs

Ina Hulsegge (I)

Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. ina.hulsegge@wur.nl.
Centre for Genetic Resources, the Netherlands, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. ina.hulsegge@wur.nl.

Mario Calus (M)

Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Rita Hoving-Bolink (R)

Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Centre for Genetic Resources, the Netherlands, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Marcos Lopes (M)

Topigs Norsvin Research Center, P.O. Box 43, 6640 AA, Beuningen, The Netherlands.
Topigs Norsvin, Curitiba, PR, 80420-210, Brazil.

Hendrik-Jan Megens (HJ)

Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Kor Oldenbroek (K)

Centre for Genetic Resources, the Netherlands, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH