Strong selection pressures maintain divergence on genomic islands in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) populations.
Journal
Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
ISSN: 1297-9686
Titre abrégé: Genet Sel Evol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9114088
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Oct 2019
29 Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
12
09
2018
accepted:
16
10
2019
entrez:
31
10
2019
pubmed:
31
10
2019
medline:
11
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Two distinct populations have been extensively studied in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.): the Northeast Arctic cod (NEAC) population and the coastal cod (CC) population. The objectives of the current study were to identify genomic islands of divergence and to propose an approach to quantify the strength of selection pressures using whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. After applying filtering criteria, information on 93 animals (9 CC individuals, 50 NEAC animals and 34 CC × NEAC crossbred individuals) and 3,123,434 autosomal SNPs were used. Four genomic islands of divergence were identified on chromosomes 1, 2, 7 and 12, which were mapped accurately based on SNP data and which extended in size from 11 to 18 Mb. These regions differed considerably between the two populations although the differences in the rest of the genome were small due to considerable gene flow between the populations. The estimates of selection pressures showed that natural selection was substantially more important than genetic drift in shaping these genomic islands. Our data confirmed results from earlier publications that suggested that genomic islands are due to chromosomal rearrangements that are under strong selection and reduce recombination between rearranged and non-rearranged segments. Our findings further support the hypothesis that selection and reduced recombination in genomic islands may promote speciation between these two populations although their habitats overlap considerably and migrations occur between them.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Two distinct populations have been extensively studied in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.): the Northeast Arctic cod (NEAC) population and the coastal cod (CC) population. The objectives of the current study were to identify genomic islands of divergence and to propose an approach to quantify the strength of selection pressures using whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. After applying filtering criteria, information on 93 animals (9 CC individuals, 50 NEAC animals and 34 CC × NEAC crossbred individuals) and 3,123,434 autosomal SNPs were used.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Four genomic islands of divergence were identified on chromosomes 1, 2, 7 and 12, which were mapped accurately based on SNP data and which extended in size from 11 to 18 Mb. These regions differed considerably between the two populations although the differences in the rest of the genome were small due to considerable gene flow between the populations. The estimates of selection pressures showed that natural selection was substantially more important than genetic drift in shaping these genomic islands. Our data confirmed results from earlier publications that suggested that genomic islands are due to chromosomal rearrangements that are under strong selection and reduce recombination between rearranged and non-rearranged segments.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings further support the hypothesis that selection and reduced recombination in genomic islands may promote speciation between these two populations although their habitats overlap considerably and migrations occur between them.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31664896
doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0503-5
pii: 10.1186/s12711-019-0503-5
pmc: PMC6819574
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
61Références
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Feb 5;367(1587):451-60
pubmed: 22201174
Genome Biol Evol. 2016 Apr 11;8(4):1012-22
pubmed: 26983822
Mol Ecol. 2016 Jun;25(11):2387-97
pubmed: 26945783
BMC Genet. 2008 Feb 26;9:18
pubmed: 18302786
Mol Ecol. 2009 Feb;18(3):375-402
pubmed: 19143936
Mol Ecol. 2013 May;22(10):2653-67
pubmed: 23611647
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Feb 5;367(1587):395-408
pubmed: 22201169
Mol Ecol. 2013 Oct;22(20):5098-111
pubmed: 23998762
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Dec 22;277(1701):3725-34
pubmed: 20591865
Nature. 2011 Aug 10;477(7363):207-10
pubmed: 21832995
BMC Genomics. 2017 Mar 31;18(1):271
pubmed: 28359300
Mol Ecol. 2016 May;25(10):2130-43
pubmed: 26923504
Mol Ecol. 2018 Jan;27(2):339-351
pubmed: 29193392
Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9
pubmed: 22388286
J Anim Sci. 2013 Aug;91(8):3574-82
pubmed: 23736060
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 17;6:23246
pubmed: 26983361
Genetics. 2004 Apr;166(4):1871-85
pubmed: 15126405
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jun 1;24(11):1403-5
pubmed: 18397895
Genome Res. 2005 Nov;15(11):1468-76
pubmed: 16251456
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 26;9(9):e106380
pubmed: 25259573
Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):375-85
pubmed: 7705638
Genome Biol Evol. 2015 May 20;7(6):1644-63
pubmed: 25994933
Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370
pubmed: 28563791
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
Heredity (Edinb). 2017 Dec;119(6):418-428
pubmed: 28930288
Nature. 1966 Nov 19;212(5064):824
pubmed: 5988212