Accuracy and Precision of an Ultrasound-Based Device to Measure the Pelvic Tilt in Several Positions.
pelvic tilt
total hip arthroplasty
ultrasound-based measurement device
Journal
Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
ISSN: 1550-9613
Titre abrégé: J Ultrasound Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8211547
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
28
03
2019
revised:
29
08
2019
accepted:
03
09
2019
pubmed:
31
10
2019
medline:
6
1
2021
entrez:
31
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A new ultrasound-based device is proposed to measure the patient-specific pelvic tilt in different daily positions. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of this device as well as the intraobserver and interobserver precisions. The accuracy was assessed by performing several tilt measurements with the device on a testing mechanical bench. The error was defined as the difference between the tilt measured with the device and the tilt provided by this test bench. Three physicians, a novice, an intermediate, and an expert user, were also asked to perform 10 measurements on 3 healthy volunteers with low, medium, and high body mass indices to analyze the intraobserver and interobserver precisions. These 10 measurements were performed in the standing, sitting, and supine positions. The mean accuracy of the device ± SD was 1.1° ± 0.7° (range, 0°-4.0°). The interobserver and intraobserver precisions were excellent whatever the body mass index and good to excellent according to the positions. There was no learning curve, and the time required to complete the measurements was approximately 5 minutes. This study presents an accurate and precise noninvasive device for measurement of the pelvic tilt in different positions.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
667-674Subventions
Organisme : Endowment fund INNOVEO of the University Hospital of Brest
Informations de copyright
© 2019 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
Références
Kluess D, Martin H, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. Med Eng Phys 2007; 29:465-471.
Sanchez-Sotelo J, Berry DJ. Epidemiology of instability after total hip replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 2001; 32:543-552
Morrey BF. Instability after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1992; 23:237-248.
Turner RS. Postoperative total hip prosthetic femoral head dislocations: incidence, etiologic factors, and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 301:196-204.
Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978; 60:217-220.
Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES. Changing indications for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv 2005; 14:82-84.
Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A:1788-1792.
Seagrave KG, Troelsen A, Malchau H, Husted H, Gromov K. Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Acta Orthop 2017; 88:10-17.
Rivière C, Lazennec JY, Van Der Straeten C, Auvinet E, Cobb J, Muirhead-Allwood S. The influence of spine-hip relations on total hip replacement: a systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017; 103:559-568.
Halawi MJ, Haddad FS. Functional acetabular component alignment. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B:1262-1263.
Lazennec JY, Clark IC, Folinais D, Tahar IN, Pour AE. What is the impact of a spinal fusion on acetabular implant orientation in functional standing and sitting positions? J Arthroplasty 2017; 32:3184-3190.
Tezuka T, Heckmann ND, Bodner RJ, Dorr LD. Functional safe zone is superior to the Lewinnek safe zone for total hip arthroplasty: why the Lewinnek safe zone is not always predictive of stability. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:3-8.
Pierrepont J, Hawdon G, Miles BP, et al. Variation in functional pelvic tilt in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B:184-191.
Esposito CI, Carroll KM, Sculco PK, Padgett DE, Jerabek SA, Mayman DJ. Total hip arthroplasty patients with fixed spinopelvic alignment are at higher risk of hip dislocation. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33:1449-1454.
DiGioia AM, Hafez MA, Jaramaz B, Levison TJ, Moody JE. Functional pelvic orientation measured from lateral standing and sitting radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 453:272-276.
Nishihara S, Sugano N, Nishii T, Ohzono K, Yoshikawa H. Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 411:140-151.
Lazennec JY, Rousseau MA, Brusson A, et al. Total hip prostheses in standing, sitting and squatting positions: an overview of our 8 years practice using the EOS imaging technology. Open Orthop J 2015; 9:26-44.
Loppini M, Longo UG, Ragucci P, Trenti N, Balzarini L, Grappiolo G. Analysis of the pelvic functional orientation in the sagittal plane: a radiographic study with EOS 2D/3D technology. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32:1027-1032.
Lazennec JY, Rousseau MA, Rangel A, et al. Pelvis and total hip arthroplasty acetabular component orientations in sitting and standing positions: measurements reproducibility with EOS imaging system versus conventional radiographies. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011; 97:373-380.
Mayr E, Kessler O, Prassl A, Rachbauer F, Krismer M, Nogler M. The frontal pelvic plane provides a valid reference system for implantation of the acetabular cup: spatial orientation of the pelvis in different positions. Acta Orthop 2005; 76:848-853.
Lee YS, Yoon TR. Error in acetabular socket alignment due to the thick anterior pelvic soft tissues. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23:699-706.
Dardenne G, Dusseau S, Hamitouche C, Lefèvre C, Stindel E. Toward a dynamic approach of THA planning based on ultrasound. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467:901-908.
Kochman A, Goral A, Kozak J, Marek W, Morawska-Kochman M, Synder M. Preoperative ultrasonographic assessment of the anterior pelvic plane for personalized total hip replacement. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37:949-958.
Lasso A, Heffter T, Rankin A, Pinter C, Ungi T, Fichtinger G. “PLUS: Open-Source Toolkit for Ultrasound-Guided Intervention Systems,” in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 2527-2537, Oct. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2014.2322864.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1977.
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89:780-785.
Patel A, Pavlou G, Mújica-Mota RE, Toms AD. The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:1076-1081.
Marques C, Martin T, Fiedler F, et al. The effects of body position on pelvic tilt angles measured with a smartphone-based navigated ultrasound system in symptom-free young adults. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2018; 3:18.