Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for the management of locally recurrent brain metastases.
Brain metastases
Local recurrence
Repeat treatment
Stereotactic radiosurgery
Journal
Journal of neuro-oncology
ISSN: 1573-7373
Titre abrégé: J Neurooncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309335
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
01
09
2019
accepted:
25
10
2019
pubmed:
2
11
2019
medline:
18
4
2020
entrez:
1
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a well-established treatment option for brain metastases (BM). Repeat SRS for progressive BM is an increasingly used paradigm, although little data is available to support this practice. The goal of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a second SRS procedure on a previously treated BM. We performed a retrospective metastasis-level analysis of patients who underwent two SRS procedures on the same lesion and for whom at least 6 months of radiological follow-up was available. The data collected included patient characteristics, clinical symptoms at time of treatment, SRS parameters, radiological response per RANO-BM criteria, clinical evolution and survival. Seventy-five BM in 56 patients were included in the analysis. Most frequent primary histologies were non-small-cell lung cancer (59%) and breast cancer (19%). At the second SRS, median treatment volume was 1.19 cc (range 0.07-20.6) treated with a median margin dose of 18 Gy (range 12-20) at the 50% isodose line (range 30-80%). Median follow-up was 11 months. Progression per RANO-BM criteria occurred in 31%, yielding actuarial local control at 1, 2, and 5 years of 68%, 54% and 54% respectively. At last follow-up, 10 patients (18%) had improved relative to the initial presentation, while 21 (38%) were stable and 25 (44%) were deteriorated. Radiation-induced edema and radionecrosis occurred in 8.3% and 5% respectively. The median survival from the diagnosis of BM was 30 months. Repeat SRS is a safe and effective novel therapeutic approach to consider in carefully selected patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31667732
doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03323-8
pii: 10.1007/s11060-019-03323-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
551-559Références
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Nov;10(11):1037-44
pubmed: 19801201
JAMA. 2016 Jul 26;316(4):401-409
pubmed: 27458945
JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2483-91
pubmed: 16757720
Lancet. 2004 May 22;363(9422):1665-72
pubmed: 15158627
Cancer. 1974 Aug;34(2):257-61
pubmed: 4137158
J Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;121 Suppl:69-74
pubmed: 25434939
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jan-Mar;2(1):2-9
pubmed: 25740120
J Neurooncol. 2019 Apr;142(2):309-317
pubmed: 30656529
Neurosurgery. 2019 Oct 1;85(4):535-542
pubmed: 30189018
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Aug 1;92(5):1008-1015
pubmed: 26050609
J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):362-372
pubmed: 28338439
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Apr;15(4):387-95
pubmed: 24621620
J Neurooncol. 2016 Jan;126(1):91-97
pubmed: 26369769
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195608
pubmed: 29621341
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jun;16(6):e270-8
pubmed: 26065612
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1049-1060
pubmed: 28687377
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2014;3(1):21-28
pubmed: 29296381
J Neurooncol. 2010 Jan;96(1):85-96
pubmed: 19957016
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 01;(3):CD009454
pubmed: 24585087
World Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;104:589-593
pubmed: 28450235
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;127(1):148-156
pubmed: 27494815