A Dyadic Perspective on Coping and its Effects on Relationship Quality and Psychological Distress in Couples Living with Chronic Pain: A Longitudinal Study.


Journal

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
ISSN: 1526-4637
Titre abrégé: Pain Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100894201

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 02 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 2 11 2019
medline: 26 1 2021
entrez: 1 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Dyadic coping is a process of coping within couples that is intended not only to support the patient with chronic pain but also to maintain equilibrium in the relationship. This study aims to investigate the effect of patient-perceived and spouse-reported dyadic coping on both the patient and their partner's relationship quality and anxiety, stress, and depression over time. One hundred thirty-nine couples, with one partner experiencing chronic pain, participated in this study. Spanning three measurements over six months, couples reported on their anxiety, stress, depression, relationship quality, and dyadic coping. Patient-perceived supportive dyadic coping was positively associated with both partners' relationship quality but was negatively associated with spouses' stress over time. Patient-perceived negative dyadic coping was negatively associated with both partners' relationship quality and positively associated with patients' depression and spouses' depression and stress over time. Spouse-reported supportive dyadic coping showed a positive association with their own relationship quality and a negative association with spouses' depression at baseline and patients' depression at three-month follow-up. Spouse-reported negative dyadic coping was negatively associated with their relationship quality at baseline and positively associated with their partner's anxiety and stress at six-month and three-month follow-up, respectively. Similar inference was observed from the findings of growth curve model. As compared with spouse report, patient perception of dyadic coping is a better predictor of both partners' relationship quality and psychological outcomes over time. Both partners may benefit from early psychosocial intervention to improve their dyadic coping, relationship quality, and psychological outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31670787
pii: 5610626
doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz267
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e102-e113

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2019 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Manasi M Mittinty (MM)

Pain Management Research Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Sara Kindt (S)

Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Murthy N Mittinty (MN)

School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

Sonia Bernardes (S)

Department of Social and Organisational Psychology, Instituto Universitario de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

Annmarie Cano (A)

Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

Lesley Verhofstadt (L)

Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Liesbet Goubert (L)

Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH