Kidney disease trials for the 21st century: innovations in design and conduct.


Journal

Nature reviews. Nephrology
ISSN: 1759-507X
Titre abrégé: Nat Rev Nephrol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101500081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2020
Historique:
accepted: 18 09 2019
pubmed: 2 11 2019
medline: 21 4 2020
entrez: 2 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Compared to other specialties, nephrology has reported relatively few clinical trials, and most of these are too small to detect moderate treatment effects. Consequently, interventions that are commonly used by nephrologists have not been adequately tested and some may be ineffective or harmful. More randomized trials are urgently needed to address important clinical questions in patients with kidney disease. The use of robust surrogate markers may accelerate early-phase drug development. However, scientific innovations in trial conduct developed by other specialties should also be adopted to improve trial quality and enable more, larger trials in kidney disease to be completed in the current era of burdensome regulation and escalating research costs. Examples of such innovations include utilizing routinely collected health-care data and disease-specific registries to identify and invite potential trial participants, and for long-term follow-up; use of prescreening to facilitate rapid recruitment of participants; use of pre-randomization run-in periods to improve participant adherence and assess responses to study interventions prior to randomization; and appropriate use of statistics to monitor studies and analyse their results. Nephrology is well positioned to harness such innovations due to its advanced use of electronic health-care records and the development of disease-specific registries. Adopting a population approach and efficient trial conduct along with challenging unscientific regulation may increase the number of definitive clinical trials in nephrology and improve the care of current and future patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31673162
doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0212-x
pii: 10.1038/s41581-019-0212-x
pmc: PMC7030944
mid: EMS84811
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

173-185

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00017/3
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R007764/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Références

Collins, R. Back to the future: the urgent need to re-introduce streamlined trials. Eur. Heart J. Suppl. 20, C14–C17 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suy001
European Society of Cardiology. Clinical Practice Guidelines https://www.escardio.org/Guidelines/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines (2019).
Nabel, E. G. & Braunwald, E. A tale of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 54–63 (2012).
pubmed: 22216842 doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1112570
Herrington, W., Lacey, B., Sherliker, P., Armitage, J. & Lewington, S. Epidemiology of atherosclerosis and the potential to reduce the global burden of atherothrombotic disease. Circ. Res. 118, 535–546 (2016).
pubmed: 26892956 doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307611
Wanner, C. et al. Empagliflozin and progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 323–334 (2016).
pubmed: 27299675 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515920
Perkovic, V. et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: results from the CANVAS program randomised clinical trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 6, 691–704 (2018).
pubmed: 29937267 doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30141-4
Zelniker, T. A. et al. Comparison of the effects of glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors for prevention of major adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation 139, 2022–2031 (2019).
pubmed: 30786725 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038868
Strippoli, G. F., Craig, J. C. & Schena, F. P. The number, quality, and coverage of randomized controlled trials in nephrology. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 15, 411–419 (2004).
pubmed: 14747388 doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000100125.21491.46
Inrig, J. K. et al. The landscape of clinical trials in nephrology: a systematic review of Clinicaltrials.gov. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 63, 771–780 (2014).
pubmed: 24315119 doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.10.043
Tonelli, M. et al. Comparison of the complexity of patients seen by different medical subspecialists in a universal health care system. JAMA Netw. Open 1, e184852 (2018).
pubmed: 30646392 pmcid: 6324421 doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4852
Kerr, M., Bray, B., Medcalf, J., O'Donoghue, D. J. & Matthews, B. Estimating the financial cost of chronic kidney disease to the NHS in England. Nephrol. Dial Transpl. 27, iii73–iii80 (2012).
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs269
Deeks, J. J. et al. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol. Assess. 7, 1–179 (2003).
doi: 10.3310/hta7270
Gerstein, H. C., McMurray, J. & Holman, R. R. Real-world studies no substitute for RCTs in establishing efficacy. Lancet 393, 210–211 (2019).
pubmed: 30663582 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32840-X
Grady, D. et al. Hormone therapy to prevent disease and prolong life in postmenopausal women. Ann. Intern. Med. 117, 1016–1037 (1992).
pubmed: 1443971 doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-12-1016
Rossouw, J. E. et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the women's health initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288, 321–333 (2002).
pubmed: 12117397 doi: 10.1001/jama.288.3.321
Collins, R. et al. Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. Lancet 388, 2532–2561 (2016).
pubmed: 27616593 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31357-5
Bennett, D. A. & Holmes, M. V. Mendelian randomisation in cardiovascular research: an introduction for clinicians. Heart 103, 1400–1407 (2017).
pubmed: 28596306 doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310605
Sun, L. et al. Causal associations of blood lipids with risk of ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage in Chinese adults. Nat. Med. 25, 569–574 (2019).
pubmed: 30858617 pmcid: 6795549 doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0366-x
Holmes, M. V. Human genetics and drug development. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 1076–1079 (2019).
pubmed: 30865805 doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1901565
Collins, R. & MacMahon, S. Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity. I: Clinical trials. Lancet 357, 373–380 (2001).
pubmed: 11211013 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03651-5
Pitt, B. et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 709–717 (1999).
pubmed: 10471456 doi: 10.1056/NEJM199909023411001
Perkovic, V. et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 2295–2306 (2019).
pubmed: 30990260 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811744
Ettehad, D. et al. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 387, 957–967 (2016).
pubmed: 26724178 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8
Xie, X. et al. Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 387, 435–443 (2016).
pubmed: 26559744 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00805-3
Herrington, W. et al. How are the effects of reducing LDL cholesterol with a statin-based regime influenced by renal function? Meta-analysis of individual data from 28 randomised trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 4, 829–839 (2016).
pubmed: 27477773 doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30266-2
Jafar, T. H. et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and progression of nondiabetic renal disease. A meta-analysis of patient-level data. Ann. Intern. Med. 135, 73–87 (2001).
pubmed: 11453706 doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-2-200107170-00007
Webster, A. C., Playford, E. G., Higgins, G., Chapman, J. R. & Craig, J. C. Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists for renal transplant recipients: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Transplantation 77, 166–176 (2004).
pubmed: 14742976 doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000109643.32659.C4
Egger, M. & Smith, G. D. Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ 310, 752–754 (1995).
pubmed: 7711568 pmcid: 2549158 doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6982.752
Chertow, G. M. et al. Effect of cinacalcet on cardiovascular disease in patients undergoing dialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 2482–2494 (2012).
pubmed: 23121374 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205624
Parfrey, P. S. et al. Lessons learned from EVOLVE for planning of future randomized trials in patients on dialysis. Clin J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 11, 539–546 (2016).
pubmed: 26614406 doi: 10.2215/CJN.06370615
Haynes, R., Landray, M. J., Herrington, W. G. & Baigent, C. in Oxford Textbook of Clinical Nephrology 4th edn (eds Turner, N. et al.) 161–170 (Oxford Uni. Press, 2015).
Baigent, C. et al. Challenges in conducting clinical trials in nephrology: conclusions from a kidney disease-improving global outcomes (KDIGO) controversies conference. Kidney Int. 92, 297–305 (2017).
pubmed: 28709600 pmcid: 6326036 doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.04.019
Pfeffer, M. A. et al. A trial of darbepoetin alfa in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 2019–2032 (2009).
pubmed: 19880844 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907845
Phrommintikul, A., Haas, S. J., Elsik, M. & Krum, H. Mortality and target haemoglobin concentrations in anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease treated with erythropoietin: a meta-analysis. Lancet 369, 381–388 (2007).
pubmed: 17276778 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60194-9
European Renal Association − European Dialysis and Transplant Association. ERA−EDTA registry annual report 2016 (ERA, 2016).
UK Renal Registry. The National Registry of Rare Kidney Disease (RaDaR) https://www.renalreg.org/projects/the-national-registry-of-rare-kidney-disease-radar/ (2019).
Moxey-Mims, M. M. et al. Glomerular diseases: registries and clinical trials. Clin J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 11, 2234–2243 (2016).
pubmed: 27672219 pmcid: 5142054 doi: 10.2215/CJN.00540116
Miner, J. H. et al. The 2014 International workshop on Alport syndrome. Kidney Int. 86, 679–684 (2014).
pubmed: 24988067 pmcid: 4182137 doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.229
Bowman, L. et al. ASCEND: a study of cardiovascular events in diabetes: characteristics of a randomized trial of aspirin and of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in 15,480 people with diabetes. Am. Heart J. 198, 135–144 (2018).
pubmed: 29653635 pmcid: 5971211 doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.12.006
Group, A. S. C. et al. Effects of aspirin for primary prevention in persons with diabetes mellitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 1529–1539 (2018).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804988
Haynes, R. et al. Effects of sacubitril/valsartan versus irbesartan in patients with chronic kidney disease. Circulation 138, 1505–1514 (2018).
pubmed: 30002098 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034818
Sharp Collaborative Group. Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP): randomized trial to assess the effects of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol among 9,438 patients with chronic kidney disease. Am. Heart J. 160, 785–794.e710 (2010).
pubmed: 21095263 doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.08.012
Lang, J. M., Buring, J. E., Rosner, B., Cook, N. & Hennekens, C. H. Estimating the effect of the run-in on the power of the Physicians' Health Study. Stat. Med. 10, 1585–1593 (1991).
pubmed: 1947514 doi: 10.1002/sim.4780101010
Landray, M. J. et al. Effects of extended-release niacin with laropiprant in high-risk patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 203–212 (2014).
pubmed: 25014686 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300955
Heerspink, H. J. L. et al. Atrasentan and renal events in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (SONAR): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 393, 1937–1947 (2019).
pubmed: 30995972 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30772-X
Symplicity, H. T. N. I. et al. Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 376, 1903–1909 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62039-9
Bhatt, D. L. et al. A controlled trial of renal denervation for resistant hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 1393–1401 (2014).
pubmed: 24678939 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402670
Howard, J. P. et al. Quantifying the 3 biases that lead to unintentional overestimation of the blood pressure-lowering effect of renal denervation. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 9, 14–22 (2016).
pubmed: 26758193 doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002533
Meeker-O'Connell, A. et al. Enhancing clinical evidence by proactively building quality into clinical trials. Clin. Trials 13, 439–444 (2016).
pubmed: 27098014 pmcid: 4952025 doi: 10.1177/1740774516643491
Pogue, J. M., Devereaux, P. J., Thorlund, K. & Yusuf, S. Central statistical monitoring: detecting fraud in clinical trials. Clin. Trials 10, 225–235 (2013).
pubmed: 23283577 doi: 10.1177/1740774512469312
3C Study Collaborative Group. Campath, calcineurin inhibitor reduction, and chronic allograft nephropathy (the 3C Study) — results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am. J. Transpl. 18, 1424–1434 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/ajt.14619
Ndounga Diakou, L. A. et al. Comparison of central adjudication of outcomes and onsite outcome assessment on treatment effect estimates. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 3, MR000043 (2016).
pubmed: 26961577
Hlatky, M. A. et al. Use of Medicare data to identify coronary heart disease outcomes in the Women's Health Initiative. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 7, 157–162 (2014).
pubmed: 24399330 pmcid: 4548886 doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000373
Frobert, O. et al. Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 1587–1597 (2013).
pubmed: 23991656 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308789
Prentice, R. L. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria. Stat. Med. 8, 431–440 (1989).
pubmed: 2727467 doi: 10.1002/sim.4780080407
Levey, A. S. et al. GFR decline as an end point for clinical trials in CKD: a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation and the US food and drug administration. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 64, 821–835 (2014).
pubmed: 25441437 doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.07.030
Fried, L. F. & Lewis, J. Albuminuria is not an appropriate therapeutic target in patients with CKD: the con view. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 10, 1089–1093 (2015).
pubmed: 25887070 pmcid: 4455218 doi: 10.2215/CJN.10681014
Lambers Heerspink, H. J. & Gansevoort, R. T. Albuminuria is an appropriate therapeutic target in patients with CKD: the pro view. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 10, 1079–1088 (2015).
pubmed: 25887073 pmcid: 4455219 doi: 10.2215/CJN.11511114
Heerspink, H. J. L. et al. Change in albuminuria as a surrogate endpoint for progression of kidney disease: a meta-analysis of treatment effects in randomised clinical trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 7, 128–139 (2019).
pubmed: 30635226 doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30314-0
Smith, M. et al. Change in albuminuria and risk of renal and cardiovascular outcomes: natural variation should be taken into account. Kidney Int. Rep. 3, 939–949 (2018).
pubmed: 29988998 pmcid: 6035156 doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2018.04.004
Thompson, A. et al. Proteinuria reduction as a surrogate end point in trials of IgA nephropathy. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 14, 469–481 (2019).
pubmed: 30635299 pmcid: 6419287 doi: 10.2215/CJN.08600718
Schluchter, M. D., Greene, T. & Beck, G. J. Analysis of change in the presence of informative censoring: application to a longitudinal clinical trial of progressive renal disease. Stat. Med. 20, 989–1007 (2001).
pubmed: 11276031 doi: 10.1002/sim.720
Vonesh, E. F., Greene, T. & Schluchter, M. D. Shared parameter models for the joint analysis of longitudinal data and event times. Stat. Med. 25, 143–163 (2006).
pubmed: 16025541 doi: 10.1002/sim.2249
Kular, D. & Macdougall, I. C. HIF stabilizers in the management of renal anemia: from bench to bedside to pediatrics. Pediatr. Nephrol. 34, 365–378 (2019).
pubmed: 29569190 doi: 10.1007/s00467-017-3849-3
McMurray, J. J. et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 993–1004 (2014).
pubmed: 25176015 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409077
Deo, A., Schmid, C. H., Earley, A., Lau, J. & Uhlig, K. Loss to analysis in randomized controlled trials in CKD. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 58, 349–355 (2011).
pubmed: 21778004 doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.04.023
Coronary Drug Project Research Group. Influence of adherence to treatment and response of cholesterol on mortality in the coronary drug project. N. Engl. J. Med. 303, 1038–1041 (1980).
doi: 10.1056/NEJM198010303031804
Eijkelkamp, W. B. et al. Albuminuria is a target for renoprotective therapy independent from blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy: post hoc analysis from the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) trial. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 18, 1540–1546 (2007).
pubmed: 17409317 doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006050445
Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 360, 7–22 (2002).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09327-3
Schmidt, M. et al. Serum creatinine elevation after renin-angiotensin system blockade and long term cardiorenal risks: cohort study. BMJ 356, j791 (2017).
pubmed: 28279964 pmcid: 5421447 doi: 10.1136/bmj.j791
Ohkuma, T. et al. Acute increases in serum creatinine after starting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-based therapy and effects of its continuation on major clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Hypertension 73, 84–91 (2019).
pubmed: 30571562 doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12060
Vickers, A. J. & Altman, D. G. Statistics notes: analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ 323, 1123–1124 (2001).
pubmed: 11701584 pmcid: 1121605 doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123
Dember, L. M. et al. Pragmatic trials in maintenance dialysis: perspectives from the kidney health initiative. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 27, 2955–2963 (2016).
pubmed: 27401689 pmcid: 5042681 doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016030340
Hemming, K., Eldridge, S., Forbes, G., Weijer, C. & Taljaard, M. How to design efficient cluster randomised trials. BMJ 358, j3064 (2017).
pubmed: 28710062 pmcid: 5508848 doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3064
Torgerson, D. J. Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer? BMJ 322, 355–357 (2001).
pubmed: 11159665 pmcid: 1119583 doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7282.355
Eldridge, S., Kerry, S. & Torgerson, D. J. Bias in identifying and recruiting participants in cluster randomised trials: what can be done? BMJ 339, b4006 (2009).
pubmed: 19819928 doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4006
Dember, L. M. et al. The time trial: a fully embedded, cluster-randomized, pragmatic trial of hemodialysis session duration. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 30, 890–903 (2019).
pubmed: 31000566 pmcid: 6493975 doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018090945
Hemming, K., Haines, T. P., Chilton, P. J., Girling, A. J. & Lilford, R. J. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ 350, h391 (2015).
pubmed: 25662947 doi: 10.1136/bmj.h391
Selby, N. M. et al. An organizational-level program of intervention for aki: a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized trial. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 30, 505–515 (2019).
pubmed: 31058607 pmcid: 6405151 doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018090886
Feldman, A. M. et al. Precision medicine for heart failure: lessons from oncology. Circ. Heart Fail. 10, e004202 (2017).
pubmed: 28611130 pmcid: 5643024 doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004202
Baigent, C. et al. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 376, 1670–1681 (2010).
pubmed: 21067804 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5
Ruggenenti, P., Bettinaglio, P., Pinares, F. & Remuzzi, G. Angiotensin converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and renoprotection in diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathies. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 3, 1511–1525 (2008).
pubmed: 18550651 pmcid: 4571148 doi: 10.2215/CJN.04140907
de Zeeuw, D., Heerspink, H. J. L., Jardine, M. & Perkovic, V. Renal trials in diabetes need a platform: time for a global approach? Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 6, 356–358 (2018).
pubmed: 28797748 doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30263-2
Heerspink, H. J. L. et al. Rationale and protocol of the Study of diabetic Nephropathy with Atrasentan (SONAR) trial: a clinical trial design novel to diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 20, 1369–1376 (2018).
pubmed: 29405626 pmcid: 5969254 doi: 10.1111/dom.13245
Park, J. J., Thorlund, K. & Mills, E. J. Critical concepts in adaptive clinical trials. Clin. Epidemiol. 10, 343–351 (2018).
pubmed: 29606891 pmcid: 5868584 doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S156708
Thorlund, K., Haggstrom, J., Park, J. J. & Mills, E. J. Key design considerations for adaptive clinical trials: a primer for clinicians. BMJ 360, k698 (2018).
pubmed: 29519932 pmcid: 5842365 doi: 10.1136/bmj.k698
Mann, J. F. et al. Avosentan for overt diabetic nephropathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 21, 527–535 (2010).
pubmed: 20167702 pmcid: 2831858 doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009060593
Hirakawa, A., Asano, J., Sato, H. & Teramukai, S. Master protocol trials in oncology: review and new trial designs. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 12, 1–8 (2018).
pubmed: 30182068 pmcid: 6120722 doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.08.009
Renfro, L. A. & Sargent, D. J. Statistical controversies in clinical research: basket trials, umbrella trials, and other master protocols: a review and examples. Ann. Oncol. 28, 34–43 (2017).
pubmed: 28177494 doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw413
Saville, B. R. & Berry, S. M. Efficiencies of platform clinical trials: a vision of the future. Clin. Trials 13, 358–366 (2016).
pubmed: 26908536 doi: 10.1177/1740774515626362
Heerspink, H. J. L. & Perkovic, V. Trial design innovations to accelerate therapeutic advances in chronic kidney disease: moving from single trials to an ongoing platform. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13, 946–948 (2018).
pubmed: 29700075 pmcid: 5989668 doi: 10.2215/CJN.01290118
Butler, C. C. et al. A trial like ALIC(4)E: why design a platform, response-adaptive, open, randomised controlled trial of antivirals for influenza-like illness? ERJ Open Res. 4, 00046-2018 (2018).
pubmed: 29761108 pmcid: 5938489 doi: 10.1183/23120541.00046-2018
Landray, M. Improving public health by improving clinical trial guidelines and their application. Eur. Heart J. 38, 1632–1637 (2017).
pubmed: 28329235 pmcid: 5837481 doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx086
Sprosen, T. Major funders establish initiative to develop new trial guidelines. MoreTrials https://moretrials.net/major-funders-establish-initiative-develop-new-trial-guidelines/ (2019).
Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Who We Are https://www.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/who-we-are (2019).
Linde, P. G. et al. Overcoming barriers in kidney health-forging a platform for innovation. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 27, 1902–1910 (2016).
pubmed: 27127187 pmcid: 4926987 doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015090976

Auteurs

William G Herrington (WG)

Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit at the University of Oxford, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Kidney Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Natalie Staplin (N)

Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit at the University of Oxford, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford, UK.

Richard Haynes (R)

Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit at the University of Oxford, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford, UK. richard.haynes@ndph.ox.ac.uk.
Oxford Kidney Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK. richard.haynes@ndph.ox.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH