Non-invasive intraventricular pressure differences estimated with cardiac MRI in subjects without heart failure and with heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction.
MRI
cardiac function
heart failure with normal ejection fraction
Journal
Open heart
ISSN: 2053-3624
Titre abrégé: Open Heart
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101631219
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
13
05
2019
revised:
24
06
2019
accepted:
11
09
2019
entrez:
2
11
2019
pubmed:
2
11
2019
medline:
2
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Non-invasive assessment of left ventricular (LV) diastolic and systolic function is important to better understand physiological abnormalities in heart failure (HF). The spatiotemporal pattern of LV blood flow velocities during systole and diastole can be used to estimate intraventricular pressure differences (IVPDs). We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of an MRI-based method to calculate systolic and diastolic IVPDs in subjects without heart failure (No-HF), and with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We studied 159 subjects without HF, 47 subjects with HFrEF and 32 subjects with HFpEF. Diastolic and systolic intraventricular flow was measured using two-dimensional in-plane phase-contrast MRI. The Euler equation was solved to compute IVPDs in diastole (mitral base to apex) and systole (apex to LV outflow tract). Subjects with HFpEF demonstrated a higher magnitude of the early diastolic reversal of IVPDs (-1.30 mm Hg) compared with the No-HF group (-0.78 mm Hg) and the HFrEF group (-0.75 mm Hg; analysis of variance p=0.01). These differences persisted after adjustment for clinical variables, Doppler-echocardiographic parameters of diastolic filling and measures of LV structure (No-HF=-0.72; HFrEF=-0.87; HFpEF=-1.52 mm Hg; p=0.006). No significant differences in systolic IVPDs were found in adjusted models. IVPD parameters demonstrated only weak correlations with standard Doppler-echocardiographic parameters. Our findings suggest distinct patterns of systolic and diastolic IVPDs in HFpEF and HFrEF, implying differences in the nature of diastolic dysfunction between the HF subtypes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31673389
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001088
pii: openhrt-2019-001088
pmc: PMC6802988
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Pagination
e001088Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K99 HL108157
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R00 HL108157
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL137984
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: JAC has received consulting honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, OPKO Healthcare, Sanifit, Akros Pharma, Fukuda-Denshi, Ironwood, Microsoft, Merck, Bayer and Pfizer. He received research grants from National Institutes of Health, American College of Radiology Network, Fukuda Denshi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Microsoft and CVRx Inc. He is named as inventor in a University of Pennsylvania patent application for the use of inorganic nitrates/nitrites for the treatment of Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction. Other authors have no disclosures.
Références
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Sep;5(9):871-3
pubmed: 22974797
Circulation. 2005 Nov 8;112(19):2921-9
pubmed: 16275881
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 Apr;29(4):277-314
pubmed: 27037982
Am J Physiol. 1996 Oct;271(4 Pt 2):H1267-76
pubmed: 8897917
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Nov 15;36(6):1942-9
pubmed: 11092668
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Sep;5(9):861-70
pubmed: 22974796
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200
pubmed: 27206819
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 May 5;43(9):1654-62
pubmed: 15120827
Magn Reson Med. 2001 May;45(5):872-9
pubmed: 11323814
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2018 Mar;56(3):469-481
pubmed: 28812203
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jul;4(4):444-55
pubmed: 21772012
Med Image Anal. 2007 Dec;11(6):513-25
pubmed: 17573232
Eur Heart J. 2011 Mar;32(6):670-9
pubmed: 21138935
Heart Fail Rev. 2016 Jan;21(1):77-94
pubmed: 26712329
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Apr;53(4):877-84
pubmed: 15799069
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Sep 4;40(5):983-90
pubmed: 12225727
Am Heart J. 2006 Jan;151(1):109-14
pubmed: 16368301
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001 Jun;280(6):H2507-15
pubmed: 11356605
Circulation. 2005 Sep 20;112(12):1771-9
pubmed: 16172285
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009 Mar;10(2):165-93
pubmed: 19270053
J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2011 Dec;19(4):169-73
pubmed: 22259658
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 21;69(11):1451-1464
pubmed: 28302294
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005 Nov;289(5):H2081-8
pubmed: 15937093
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2013 May;66(5):337-41
pubmed: 24775813
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Oct 14;5(10):
pubmed: 27742619
Magn Reson Med. 2003 Jun;49(6):1056-66
pubmed: 12768584
Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Nov;5(6):669-71
pubmed: 23170020
Eur Heart J. 2007 Oct;28(20):2539-50
pubmed: 17428822
Eur Heart J. 2012 Jul;33(14):1787-847
pubmed: 22611136