Development and First Use of the Patient's Qualitative Assessment of Treatment (PQAT) Questionnaire in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus to Explore Individualised Benefit-Harm of Drugs Received During Clinical Studies.


Journal

Drug safety
ISSN: 1179-1942
Titre abrégé: Drug Saf
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 9002928

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 5 11 2019
medline: 19 3 2020
entrez: 4 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Individualised benefit-harm assessments can help identify patient-perceived benefits and harms of a treatment, and associated trade-offs that may influence patients' willingness to use a treatment. This research presents the first use of a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess patient-perceived benefits and disadvantages of drugs received during clinical studies. The Patient's Qualitative Assessment of Treatment (PQAT) was developed in English and cognitively tested with US (n = 4) and Canadian (n = 3) patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The revised version of the PQAT comprises three qualitative open-ended questions focused on the benefits and disadvantages of treatment and reasons why patients would choose to continue/discontinue treatment. A final quantitative question asks patients to evaluate the balance between benefits and disadvantages using a 7-point scale. The revised version of the questionnaire was administered as an exploratory endpoint in a phase II clinical trial for a new injectable treatment for T2DM. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis, and relationships between qualitative and quantitative data were identified. Patient-reported benefits of treatment administered during the clinical trial included clinical markers of efficacy and subjective markers. Disadvantages reported by patients were mainly related to drug adverse effects or to the mode of administration. Of the 57 patients completing the PQAT, 70.2% reported being willing to continue treatment, with 59.6% reporting that the benefits outweighed the disadvantages. The reported benefits of feeling better and improved energy levels were more likely to be associated with a more positive ratio (70% and 71.4%, respectively), while the disadvantages of fatigue, headaches, and stomach pain were associated with a negative ratio and patients not being willing to continue the treatment. The PQAT is a unique patient-reported outcome tool designed to aid understanding patients' real experience of benefits and disadvantages of a treatment. It combines the richness of qualitative data with quantitative data-information valuable for various stakeholders to make well-informed treatment decisions. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02973321.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31679129
doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00877-4
pii: 10.1007/s40264-019-00877-4
pmc: PMC7007419
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02973321']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

119-134

Références

Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Diabetologia. 2016 Jan;59(1):13-20
pubmed: 26498592
Per Med. 2018 Jan;15(1):5-8
pubmed: 29714111
Trials. 2019 Jun 24;20(1):381
pubmed: 31234945
BMJ. 2017 Feb 20;356:j816
pubmed: 28219884
Value Health. 2018 Jun;21(6):742-747
pubmed: 29909880
Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Sep;64(10):1402-14
pubmed: 20716148
Trends Mol Med. 2015 Aug;21(8):461-2
pubmed: 26129865
Value Health. 2018 Jan;21(1):59-68
pubmed: 29304942
Rev Diabet Stud. 2014 Fall-Winter;11(3-4):202-30
pubmed: 26177483
Metabolism. 2019 Sep;98:104-111
pubmed: 31255662
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Jun 7;2:21
pubmed: 29062521
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Jun;10(3):269-81
pubmed: 20545592
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Apr 15;24(8):1780-1784
pubmed: 29237718
Diabetes Spectr. 2015 Nov;28(4):227-9
pubmed: 26600722
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Sep;53(5):630-638
pubmed: 30348019
Health Serv Insights. 2013 Aug 04;6:61-8
pubmed: 25114561

Auteurs

Adam Gater (A)

Adelphi Values, Adelphi Mill, Bollington, SK10 5JB, Cheshire, UK.

Matthew Reaney (M)

Sanofi Aventis Group, One Onslow Street, Guildford, GU1 4YS, Surrey, UK.

Amy Findley (A)

Adelphi Values, Adelphi Mill, Bollington, SK10 5JB, Cheshire, UK.

Catherine Brun-Strang (C)

Sanofi, 54-56 Rue la Boétie, 75008, Paris, France.

Kate Burrows (K)

Adelphi Values, Adelphi Mill, Bollington, SK10 5JB, Cheshire, UK.

My-Liên Nguyên-Pascal (ML)

Sanofi Aventis Research Development, 1 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 91385, Chilly-Mazarin Cedex, France.

Aude Roborel de Climens (A)

Sanofi Aventis Group, 14 Espace Henry Vallée, 69007, Lyon, France. Aude.Roborel-De-Climens@sanofi.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH