Development and First Use of the Patient's Qualitative Assessment of Treatment (PQAT) Questionnaire in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus to Explore Individualised Benefit-Harm of Drugs Received During Clinical Studies.
Journal
Drug safety
ISSN: 1179-1942
Titre abrégé: Drug Saf
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 9002928
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
5
11
2019
medline:
19
3
2020
entrez:
4
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Individualised benefit-harm assessments can help identify patient-perceived benefits and harms of a treatment, and associated trade-offs that may influence patients' willingness to use a treatment. This research presents the first use of a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess patient-perceived benefits and disadvantages of drugs received during clinical studies. The Patient's Qualitative Assessment of Treatment (PQAT) was developed in English and cognitively tested with US (n = 4) and Canadian (n = 3) patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The revised version of the PQAT comprises three qualitative open-ended questions focused on the benefits and disadvantages of treatment and reasons why patients would choose to continue/discontinue treatment. A final quantitative question asks patients to evaluate the balance between benefits and disadvantages using a 7-point scale. The revised version of the questionnaire was administered as an exploratory endpoint in a phase II clinical trial for a new injectable treatment for T2DM. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis, and relationships between qualitative and quantitative data were identified. Patient-reported benefits of treatment administered during the clinical trial included clinical markers of efficacy and subjective markers. Disadvantages reported by patients were mainly related to drug adverse effects or to the mode of administration. Of the 57 patients completing the PQAT, 70.2% reported being willing to continue treatment, with 59.6% reporting that the benefits outweighed the disadvantages. The reported benefits of feeling better and improved energy levels were more likely to be associated with a more positive ratio (70% and 71.4%, respectively), while the disadvantages of fatigue, headaches, and stomach pain were associated with a negative ratio and patients not being willing to continue the treatment. The PQAT is a unique patient-reported outcome tool designed to aid understanding patients' real experience of benefits and disadvantages of a treatment. It combines the richness of qualitative data with quantitative data-information valuable for various stakeholders to make well-informed treatment decisions. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02973321.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31679129
doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00877-4
pii: 10.1007/s40264-019-00877-4
pmc: PMC7007419
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02973321']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
119-134Références
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Diabetologia. 2016 Jan;59(1):13-20
pubmed: 26498592
Per Med. 2018 Jan;15(1):5-8
pubmed: 29714111
Trials. 2019 Jun 24;20(1):381
pubmed: 31234945
BMJ. 2017 Feb 20;356:j816
pubmed: 28219884
Value Health. 2018 Jun;21(6):742-747
pubmed: 29909880
Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Sep;64(10):1402-14
pubmed: 20716148
Trends Mol Med. 2015 Aug;21(8):461-2
pubmed: 26129865
Value Health. 2018 Jan;21(1):59-68
pubmed: 29304942
Rev Diabet Stud. 2014 Fall-Winter;11(3-4):202-30
pubmed: 26177483
Metabolism. 2019 Sep;98:104-111
pubmed: 31255662
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Jun 7;2:21
pubmed: 29062521
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Jun;10(3):269-81
pubmed: 20545592
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Apr 15;24(8):1780-1784
pubmed: 29237718
Diabetes Spectr. 2015 Nov;28(4):227-9
pubmed: 26600722
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Sep;53(5):630-638
pubmed: 30348019
Health Serv Insights. 2013 Aug 04;6:61-8
pubmed: 25114561