Does the Application of Topical Intrawound Vancomycin Powder Affect Deep Surgical Site Infection and the Responsible Organisms after Spinal Surgery?: A Retrospective Case Series with a Historical Control Group.
Infection
Postoperative complications
Spine
Surgical wound infection
Vancomy
Journal
Asian spine journal
ISSN: 1976-1902
Titre abrégé: Asian Spine J
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101314177
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
26
11
2018
accepted:
19
04
2019
pubmed:
5
11
2019
medline:
5
11
2019
entrez:
5
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Retrospective case series with a historical control group. To compare the deep wound infection rates in patients undergoing spinal surgery with the application of topical intrawound vancomycin powder (TIVP) in the surgical site in addition to standard systemic prophylaxis with those in a matched historical cohort of patients for whom TIVP was not used. Surgical site infection (SSI) after spine surgery is debilitating and is responsible for a significant increase in the health care costs, hospital stay, and morbidities. Although the application of TIVP before surgical closure is a promising method for reducing the SSI rate after spine surgery, its use is controversial, and currently, research trials are focusing on identifying its safety, efficacy, and the potential patient population. A group of 88 patients who underwent posterior spinal surgery with TIVP administration (treatment group) was compared to a historical control group of 70 patients who had received only standard systemic intravenous prophylaxis (control group) for the analysis of deep SSI rate and the involved organisms. The overall rate of deep SSIs was 2.5% (4/158). All the SSIs were observed in patients who had posterior instrumentation and fusion for ≥3 levels. In the treatment group, the SSI rate was 3.4% (3/88), and the bacteria isolated were Escherichia coli (n=2) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=1). In the control group, the infection rate was 1.4% (1/70), and the isolated bacteria were Morganella morganii and Staphylococcus epidermidis. No statistically significant association was found between the SSI rates of the treatment and control groups. Although the difference in the SSI rates was not statistically significant, the present results suggest that TIVP administration could not reduce the risk of deep SSIs after spinal surgery. Moreover, TIVP administration might also affect the underlying pathogens by increasing the propensity for gram-negative species.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31679328
pii: asj.2018.0298
doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0298
pmc: PMC7010508
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
72-78Références
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 May/Jun;18(4):461-473
pubmed: 27901415
Acta Orthop Belg. 1999 Jun;65(2):182-7
pubmed: 10427800
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996 Aug;17(8):539-44
pubmed: 8875300
Musculoskelet Surg. 2018 Apr;102(1):35-39
pubmed: 28699136
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Jan;22(1):26-33
pubmed: 25380539
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Feb 1;70(3):195-283
pubmed: 23327981
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Aug;(437):111-4
pubmed: 16056035
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 20;38(12):991-4
pubmed: 23324930
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Dec 1;38(25):2149-55
pubmed: 24048091
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 15;36(24):2084-8
pubmed: 21304438
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 1;39(7):550-5
pubmed: 24480966
J Spinal Disord. 2000 Oct;13(5):422-6
pubmed: 11052352
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jan 15;39(2):177-84
pubmed: 24158179
J Biomater Appl. 2011 Nov;26(4):491-506
pubmed: 20819915
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jan 1;96(1):46-51
pubmed: 24382724
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Oct 15;39(22):1875-80
pubmed: 25077909
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 15;38(14):1183-7
pubmed: 23474597
Spine J. 2015 Apr 1;15(4):762-70
pubmed: 25637469
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E11
pubmed: 26424335
Eur Spine J. 2015 Mar;24(3):533-42
pubmed: 24838506
Spine J. 2011 Jul;11(7):641-6
pubmed: 21600853
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Feb 15;42(4):267-274
pubmed: 28207669