Reconstructive burden and financial implications of wider excision margins for invasive primary cutaneous melanoma.
Excision margins
Finance
Melanoma
Reconstruction
Journal
Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS
ISSN: 1878-0539
Titre abrégé: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101264239
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
15
08
2019
accepted:
20
09
2019
pubmed:
5
11
2019
medline:
21
8
2020
entrez:
5
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
For invasive primary cutaneous melanoma, wider excision is advocated to reduce local recurrence risk and improve patient outcomes. Excision detail is controversial, especially in intermediate- and high-risk primary melanoma (AJCC pT2-pT4). Guidance varies from sizes 1 to 3 cm (translating into large defects of 2-6 cm). The aim of this study was to determine the reconstructive and resource burden of wider excision margins (EMs). Data analysis from our prospective database (2008-2017) included 1184 patients (563F:621 M) with cutaneous melanoma (pT1b-pT4b). Procedure tariff data were sourced from our financial services department. Two hundred twenty-nine patients had a narrower EM (1 cm) and 995 (80.7%) had a wider EM (2-3 cm). Reconstructive requirement significantly increased with a wider EM collectively (11.3% vs 29.3%, odds ratio (OR) = 3.2; p < 0.0001), in the extremities (15.2% vs 42.0%; p < 0.0001), and in the head and neck (H&N) (23.5 % vs 64.7%; p < 0.0001). Reconstruction significantly increased hospitalisation rates (26.6% vs 63.0%, OR = 4.7; p < 0.0001) collectively, in the H&N (26.8 % vs 53.9%), and in the upper (18.9 % vs 42.3%) and lower extremities (34.8% vs 77.3%). Narrower EMs significantly reduced hospitalisation rates in the upper and lower extremities (7.1% vs 28.5%; p = 0.004, 37.9% vs 58.5%; p = 0.005, respectively). Overall procedure cost significantly increased by £180 (mean, p < 0.0001) and £346 (median, p = 0.0004) per patient when reconstruction was required. Our data suggest substantial impact of wider EM on patients, which more than doubled in the functionally and cosmetically sensitive extremities and the H&N region. Reconstructions add significant financial and healthcare service burden. Without randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence demonstrating increased efficacy of wider EM, narrower EM is advocated whilst awaiting future planned RCT results specifically investigating on this.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
For invasive primary cutaneous melanoma, wider excision is advocated to reduce local recurrence risk and improve patient outcomes. Excision detail is controversial, especially in intermediate- and high-risk primary melanoma (AJCC pT2-pT4). Guidance varies from sizes 1 to 3 cm (translating into large defects of 2-6 cm). The aim of this study was to determine the reconstructive and resource burden of wider excision margins (EMs).
METHODS
METHODS
Data analysis from our prospective database (2008-2017) included 1184 patients (563F:621 M) with cutaneous melanoma (pT1b-pT4b). Procedure tariff data were sourced from our financial services department.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Two hundred twenty-nine patients had a narrower EM (1 cm) and 995 (80.7%) had a wider EM (2-3 cm). Reconstructive requirement significantly increased with a wider EM collectively (11.3% vs 29.3%, odds ratio (OR) = 3.2; p < 0.0001), in the extremities (15.2% vs 42.0%; p < 0.0001), and in the head and neck (H&N) (23.5 % vs 64.7%; p < 0.0001). Reconstruction significantly increased hospitalisation rates (26.6% vs 63.0%, OR = 4.7; p < 0.0001) collectively, in the H&N (26.8 % vs 53.9%), and in the upper (18.9 % vs 42.3%) and lower extremities (34.8% vs 77.3%). Narrower EMs significantly reduced hospitalisation rates in the upper and lower extremities (7.1% vs 28.5%; p = 0.004, 37.9% vs 58.5%; p = 0.005, respectively). Overall procedure cost significantly increased by £180 (mean, p < 0.0001) and £346 (median, p = 0.0004) per patient when reconstruction was required.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our data suggest substantial impact of wider EM on patients, which more than doubled in the functionally and cosmetically sensitive extremities and the H&N region. Reconstructions add significant financial and healthcare service burden. Without randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence demonstrating increased efficacy of wider EM, narrower EM is advocated whilst awaiting future planned RCT results specifically investigating on this.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31680028
pii: S1748-6815(19)30438-3
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.09.035
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
313-318Informations de copyright
Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest None.