Gender and the Body Size Aftereffect: Implications for Neural Processing.
adaptation
aftereffects
body image
body size and shape misperception
gender
neural representation
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
20
07
2019
accepted:
30
09
2019
entrez:
5
11
2019
pubmed:
5
11
2019
medline:
5
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Prolonged exposure to wide (thin) bodies causes a perceptual aftereffect such that subsequently viewed bodies appear thinner (wider) than they actually are. This phenomenon is known as visual adaptation. We used the adaptation paradigm to examine the gender selectivity of the neural mechanisms encoding body size and shape. Observers adjusted female and male test bodies to appear normal-sized both before and after adaptation to bodies digitally altered to appear heavier or lighter. In Experiment 1, observers adapted simultaneously to bodies of each gender distorted in opposite directions, e.g., thin females and wide males. The direction of resultant aftereffects was contingent on the gender of the test stimulus, such that in this example female test bodies appeared wider while male test bodies appeared thinner. This indicates at least some separation of the neural mechanisms processing body size and shape for the two genders. In Experiment 2, adaptation involved either wide females, thin females, wide males or thin males. Aftereffects were present in all conditions, but were stronger when test and adaptation genders were congruent, suggesting some overlap in the tuning of gender-selective neural mechanisms. Given that visual adaptation has been implicated in real-world examples of body size and shape misperception (e.g., in anorexia nervosa or obesity), these results may have implications for the development of body image therapies based on the adaptation model.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31680834
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01100
pmc: PMC6813220
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1100Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Brooks, Baldry, Mond, Stevenson, Mitchison and Stephen.
Références
N C Med J. 2008 May-Jun;69(3):188-94
pubmed: 18751350
Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 15;202:116085
pubmed: 31401238
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991 May;43(2):161-204
pubmed: 1866456
J Vis. 2013 Aug 22;13(10):
pubmed: 23970436
Psychol Rev. 1957 Nov;64, Part 1(6):384-404
pubmed: 13505974
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Nov;57:21-31
pubmed: 28818670
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Dec;34(12):3233-46
pubmed: 22807338
J Int Med Res. 2017 Dec;45(6):2001-2008
pubmed: 29076380
Trends Neurosci. 2006 May;29(5):250-6
pubmed: 16529826
Front Neurosci. 2016 Jul 15;10:334
pubmed: 27471447
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 Sep;21(3):555-69
pubmed: 26857215
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 17;7(1):15773
pubmed: 29150646
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):313-7
pubmed: 23398261
Science. 1963 Feb 1;139(3553):412-4
pubmed: 13966712
Neuroimage. 2011 Jun 1;56(3):1822-31
pubmed: 21362488
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 03;11(6):e0156722
pubmed: 27257677
Curr Biol. 2019 Aug 5;29(15):2496-2500.e3
pubmed: 31327721
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 10;7:40392
pubmed: 28071712
Neuroimage. 2009 May 1;45(4):1264-71
pubmed: 19349239
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Feb;34(1):101-12
pubmed: 18248142
J Psychosom Res. 1998 Mar-Apr;44(3-4):451-6
pubmed: 9587887
Br J Psychol. 2020 Nov;111(4):742-761
pubmed: 31880827
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Nov 7;272(1578):2283-7
pubmed: 16191641
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Jun 6;5(6):172103
pubmed: 30110427
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 15;10:2532
pubmed: 31803097
Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1537-47
pubmed: 17707364
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Mar;22(3):482-95
pubmed: 19309293
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Jan;15(1):133-149
pubmed: 31725353
Prev Med. 2012 Aug;55(2):93-100
pubmed: 22781370