Getting Everyone Onboard: Framing Collective Goal Progress Broadens Participation in Collective Marketing Campaigns.

environmental decision making fundraising goal pursuit interpersonal processes political consumption social influence

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 17 07 2019
accepted: 03 10 2019
entrez: 5 11 2019
pubmed: 5 11 2019
medline: 5 11 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Collective marketing campaigns may feature goals that are not shared equally by all customers, such as a fundraiser for an environmental cause. For such campaigns, how can marketers encourage broad participation? The present research demonstrates that the framing of collective progress in such campaigns can broaden participation by highlighting the "large area" of progress toward the goal, emphasizing progress achieved for campaigns in their late stages and progress remaining in their early stages. We tested this large area hypothesis in the context of a waste reduction drive, examining the reactions of Democrats and Republicans who might be more or less inclined to support the drive respectively. Study 1 examined these processes when the drive was nearing completion, finding that an accumulating frame (focusing on progress achieved) increased motivation to participate for Republicans to levels comparable with Democrats. Study 2 evaluated these processes at earlier stages in the drive's progress. In these circumstances, a remaining frame (focusing on contributions still needed) increased motivation to participate among Republicans to a similar level as Democrats. These findings indicate framings that highlight the large area in collective progress broaden participation in collective marketing campaigns, suggesting that marketers should highlight remaining contributions needed early on and accumulated contributions received later in collective marketing campaigns.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31681126
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02353
pmc: PMC6813241
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2353

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Kim and Reeck.

Références

Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 15;9(1):11880
pubmed: 31417106
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;94(2):183-95
pubmed: 18211171
Psychol Sci. 2010 Apr;21(4):494-8
pubmed: 20424089
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 11;10:1345
pubmed: 31244737
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Feb;41(2):250-67
pubmed: 25540328
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 04;9:1052
pubmed: 30022959
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Mar;36(3):326-38
pubmed: 20008965
Psychol Bull. 2003 May;129(3):339-75
pubmed: 12784934
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Aug;101(2):366-85
pubmed: 21244182
Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar 1;24(3):326-33
pubmed: 23381562
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May;96(5):1029-46
pubmed: 19379034
J Soc Psychol. 2009 Aug;149(4):425-49
pubmed: 19702104
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Aug;140(3):520-34
pubmed: 21668127
Psychol Sci. 2011 May;22(5):607-12
pubmed: 21474842

Auteurs

Yaeeun Kim (Y)

Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Crystal Reeck (C)

Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Classifications MeSH