Psychological and physiological effects of applying self-control to the mobile phone.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
14
06
2019
accepted:
14
10
2019
entrez:
5
11
2019
pubmed:
5
11
2019
medline:
3
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This preregistered study examined the psychological and physiological consequences of exercising self-control with the mobile phone. A total of 125 participants were randomly assigned to sit in an unadorned room for six minutes and either (a) use their mobile phone, (b) sit alone with no phone, or (c) sit with their device but resist using it. Consistent with prior work, participants self-reported more concentration difficulty and more mind wandering with no device present compared to using the phone. Resisting the phone led to greater perceived concentration abilities than sitting without the device (not having external stimulation). Failing to replicate prior work, however, participants without external stimulation did not rate the experience as less enjoyable or more boring than having something to do. We also observed that skin conductance data were consistent across conditions for the first three-minutes of the experiment, after which participants who resisted the phone were less aroused than those who were without the phone. We discuss how the findings contribute to our understanding of exercising self-control with mobile media and how psychological consequences, such as increased mind wandering and focusing challenges, relate to periods of idleness or free thinking.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31682619
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224464
pii: PONE-D-19-16939
pmc: PMC6827987
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0224464Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jan;74(1):224-37
pubmed: 9457784
Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 23;4:626
pubmed: 24065936
Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;29(7):1159-1177
pubmed: 29799765
Emotion. 2017 Aug;17(5):828-839
pubmed: 28191992
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep;7(5):450-63
pubmed: 26168503
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jul;53(1):5-13
pubmed: 3612492
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70
pubmed: 3397865
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Sep;2(9):637-644
pubmed: 31346273
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 09;5:1427
pubmed: 25538668
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 May 12;:null
pubmed: 29754412
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 5;108(14):5548-53
pubmed: 21436052
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jun;23(6):582-8
pubmed: 22547657
J Res Pers. 2008;42(3):763-770
pubmed: 18704202
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 25;13(10):e0205384
pubmed: 30359368
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;21(7):926-30
pubmed: 20548057
Psychophysiology. 1993 May;30(3):261-73
pubmed: 8497555
Public Opin Q. 2016 Spring;80(1):180-211
pubmed: 27257310
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 28;9(1):3071
pubmed: 30816143
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Nov;17(11):718-731
pubmed: 27654862
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;22(6):479-490
pubmed: 29776466
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 6;108(36):14998-5003
pubmed: 21876169
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 May;80(2):87-95
pubmed: 21320551
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Nov;117(5):e71-e83
pubmed: 30035566
Science. 2014 Jul 4;345(6192):75-7
pubmed: 24994650