ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Osteomyelitis of the Foot in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.
Contrast Media
Diabetes Mellitus
/ epidemiology
Diabetic Foot
/ diagnostic imaging
Diagnostic Imaging
/ methods
Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Male
Osteomyelitis
/ diagnostic imaging
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
/ methods
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Quality Control
Radiology
/ standards
Sensitivity and Specificity
Severity of Illness Index
Societies, Medical
/ standards
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
/ methods
Ultrasonography, Doppler
/ methods
United States
AUC
Appropriate Use Criteria
Appropriateness Criteria
Charcot foot
Diabetic foot
Foot osteomyelitis
Neuropathic osteoarthropathy
Soft-tissue ulcer
Ulcer
Journal
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
ISSN: 1558-349X
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101190326
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
16
05
2019
accepted:
16
05
2019
entrez:
6
11
2019
pubmed:
7
11
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Diabetes-related foot complications such as soft-tissue infection, osteomyelitis, and neuropathic osteoarthropathy account for up to 20% of all diabetic-related North American hospital admissions. Radiography of the foot is usually appropriate as the initial screening examination in diabetic patients with suspected osteomyelitis of the foot. For follow-up examination, MRI of the foot with or without contrast enhancement demonstrates excellent soft-tissue contrast and sensitivity to marrow abnormalities with high-resolution detail in multiple anatomic planes and is usually appropriate when osteomyelitis or early neuropathic arthropathy is suspected. This publication of diabetes-related foot complications summarizes the literature and makes recommendations for imaging based on the available data. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31685111
pii: S1546-1440(19)30617-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.027
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S440-S450Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.