Advance care planning in COPD: guidance development for healthcare professionals.

advance care planning chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Journal

BMJ supportive & palliative care
ISSN: 2045-4368
Titre abrégé: BMJ Support Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101565123

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Nov 2019
Historique:
received: 12 08 2019
revised: 19 09 2019
accepted: 21 10 2019
entrez: 6 11 2019
pubmed: 7 11 2019
medline: 7 11 2019
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To examine current practices, attitudes and levels of confidence related to advance care planning (ACP) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among healthcare professionals working in Ireland. This will inform future clinical guidance development. A cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals. There were 143 participants (109 general practitioners, 25 nurses, 7 physiotherapists and 2 consultant physicians). The majority (82%, n=117) cared for patients with COPD weekly, but only 23% (n=33) had initiated ACP with a patient with COPD over the previous 6 months. Overall, 59% (n=85) answered ≥6 of 8 general knowledge questions correctly. Participants demonstrated positive attitudes towards ACP (mean score 3.6/5.0), but confidence levels were low (2.2/4.0). Most thought ACP was appropriate for patients with severe or very severe COPD (71%, n=101%, and 91%, n=130, respectively) but were unsure or felt that it was not appropriate for those with mild-moderate COPD. However, almost all participants (97%, n=139) stated that if a patient expressed a desire to have ACP discussions, they would comply. Topics most likely to be discussed related to diagnosis and treatment options. Death and end-of-life issues were rarely discussed. The death of a family member or friend and participation in support groups were identified as new 'triggers' for initiating ACP. Targeted education to improve general knowledge and confidence levels among healthcare professionals, together with initiatives to increase public awareness of ACP so that patients themselves might be more inclined to start the discussion, may help increase the uptake of ACP for this patient group.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31685522
pii: bmjspcare-2019-002002
doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Elaine Meehan (E)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cork, Ireland.

Catherine Sweeney (C)

School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Tony Foley (T)

School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Elaine Lehane (E)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Art Burgess Kelleher (A)

School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Ruth M Hally (RM)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Deirdre Shanagher (D)

Irish Hospice Foundation, Dublin, Ireland.

Bettina Korn (B)

Hospice Friendly Hospital Programme, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Mary Rabbitte (M)

All Ireland Institute of Hospice and Palliative Care, Dublin, Ireland.

Karen Margaret Detering (KM)

Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Nicola Cornally (N)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland n.cornally@ucc.ie.

Classifications MeSH