Factors Associated With Family Member's Spanking of 3.5-year-old Children in Japan.
Adult
Child Abuse
/ prevention & control
Child Rearing
/ psychology
Child, Preschool
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Fathers
/ psychology
Female
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Japan
Male
Mothers
/ psychology
Parenting
/ psychology
Parents
/ psychology
Punishment
/ psychology
Socioeconomic Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
corporal punishment
family structure
parenting
socioeconomic factor
spanking
Journal
Journal of epidemiology
ISSN: 1349-9092
Titre abrégé: J Epidemiol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9607688
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Oct 2020
05 Oct 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
7
11
2019
medline:
31
3
2021
entrez:
6
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Spanking can cause adverse psychological development and biological functional changes in children. However, spanking is widely used by parents in Japan. This study explored the risk factors for family member's spanking of 3.5-year-old children using nationwide population data in Japan. Surveys were administered to family members in Japan who had a child in 2001 (first cohort) or in 2010 (second cohort), and the data when their child was 0.5, 1.5, and 3.5 years old were used. We used multivariate binary and ordinal logistic regression analyses to examine the associations between risk factors and spanking children at 3.5 years of age, which was subcategorized into frequencies of never, sometimes, and always spanking, presented with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Among 70,450 families, 62.8% and 7.9% sometimes and always spanked their children, respectively. Children in the second cohort were spanked less frequently compared with those in the first cohort, and fathers who responded to the questionnaire spanked children less frequently than mothers who responded. Identified associated factors for spanking were male child, presence of siblings of the child, not living in a two-parent household, not living in a three-generation household, younger parents, parents with lower education, no outside work or unstable work, and lower family income. We found a high prevalence of spanking and its associated factors. Approaching those with lower socioeconomic factors and promoting fathers' involvement in parenting may be important public health strategies for reducing and preventing spanking.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Spanking can cause adverse psychological development and biological functional changes in children. However, spanking is widely used by parents in Japan. This study explored the risk factors for family member's spanking of 3.5-year-old children using nationwide population data in Japan.
METHODS
METHODS
Surveys were administered to family members in Japan who had a child in 2001 (first cohort) or in 2010 (second cohort), and the data when their child was 0.5, 1.5, and 3.5 years old were used. We used multivariate binary and ordinal logistic regression analyses to examine the associations between risk factors and spanking children at 3.5 years of age, which was subcategorized into frequencies of never, sometimes, and always spanking, presented with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 70,450 families, 62.8% and 7.9% sometimes and always spanked their children, respectively. Children in the second cohort were spanked less frequently compared with those in the first cohort, and fathers who responded to the questionnaire spanked children less frequently than mothers who responded. Identified associated factors for spanking were male child, presence of siblings of the child, not living in a two-parent household, not living in a three-generation household, younger parents, parents with lower education, no outside work or unstable work, and lower family income.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We found a high prevalence of spanking and its associated factors. Approaching those with lower socioeconomic factors and promoting fathers' involvement in parenting may be important public health strategies for reducing and preventing spanking.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31685725
doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20190160
pmc: PMC7492701
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
464-473Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011 Aug 1;33(8):1364-1373
pubmed: 21686081
J Fam Psychol. 2014 Dec;28(6):897-907
pubmed: 25243577
Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5):1321-30
pubmed: 15121948
Child Maltreat. 2003 May;8(2):84-97
pubmed: 12735711
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Jan;33(1):1-11
pubmed: 19167070
Infant Child Dev. 2012 Jan;21(1):3-33
pubmed: 24839402
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;39(2):588-97
pubmed: 19923202
Int J Pediatr. 2010;2010:672780
pubmed: 20976255
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Jul;69:62-71
pubmed: 28448815
Psychol Bull. 2002 Jul;128(4):539-79
pubmed: 12081081
Neuroimage. 2009 Aug;47 Suppl 2:T66-71
pubmed: 19285558
Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Aug;30(8):893-907
pubmed: 16930696
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997 Aug;151(8):761-7
pubmed: 9265876
Health Care Women Int. 1993 Nov-Dec;14(6):527-37
pubmed: 8138470
Pediatrics. 2013 Nov;132(5):e1118-25
pubmed: 24144718
Child Dev. 1994 Apr;65(2 Spec No):649-65
pubmed: 8013245
Soc Work. 2001 Jul;46(3):256-66
pubmed: 11495370
Child Abuse Negl. 2000 Dec;24(12):1529-42
pubmed: 11197032
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 May;43:73-82
pubmed: 25676108
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Sep;71:24-31
pubmed: 28126359