Williams syndrome hemideletion and LIMK1 variation both affect dorsal stream functional connectivity.
Williams syndrome
copy number variation
functional connectivity
intraparietal sulcus
resting-state functional MRI
Journal
Brain : a journal of neurology
ISSN: 1460-2156
Titre abrégé: Brain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372537
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2019
01 12 2019
Historique:
received:
05
09
2018
revised:
08
07
2019
accepted:
28
08
2019
pubmed:
7
11
2019
medline:
22
5
2020
entrez:
6
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Williams syndrome is a rare genetic disorder caused by hemizygous deletion of ∼1.6 Mb affecting 26 genes on chromosome 7 (7q11.23) and is clinically typified by two cognitive/behavioural hallmarks: marked visuospatial deficits relative to verbal and non-verbal reasoning abilities and hypersocial personality. Clear knowledge of the circumscribed set of genes that are affected in Williams syndrome, along with the well-characterized neurobehavioural phenotype, offers the potential to elucidate neurogenetic principles that may apply in genetically and clinically more complex settings. The intraparietal sulcus, in the dorsal visual processing stream, has been shown to be structurally and functionally altered in Williams syndrome, providing a target for investigating resting-state functional connectivity and effects of specific genes hemideleted in Williams syndrome. Here, we tested for effects of the LIMK1 gene, deleted in Williams syndrome and important for neuronal maturation and migration, on intraparietal sulcus functional connectivity. We first defined a target brain phenotype by comparing intraparietal sulcus resting functional connectivity in individuals with Williams syndrome, in whom LIMK1 is hemideleted, with typically developing children. Then in two separate cohorts from the general population, we asked whether intraparietal sulcus functional connectivity patterns similar to those found in Williams syndrome were associated with sequence variation of the LIMK1 gene. Four independent between-group comparisons of resting-state functional MRI data (total n = 510) were performed: (i) 20 children with Williams syndrome compared to 20 age- and sex-matched typically developing children; (ii) a discovery cohort of 99 healthy adults stratified by LIMK1 haplotype; (iii) a replication cohort of 32 healthy adults also stratified by LIMK1 haplotype; and (iv) 339 healthy adolescent children stratified by LIMK1 haplotype. For between-group analyses, differences in intraparietal sulcus resting-state functional connectivity were calculated comparing children with Williams syndrome to matched typically developing children and comparing LIMK1 haplotype groups in each of the three general population cohorts separately. Consistent with the visuospatial construction impairment and hypersocial personality that typify Williams syndrome, the Williams syndrome cohort exhibited opposite patterns of intraparietal sulcus functional connectivity with visual processing regions and social processing regions: decreased circuit function in the former and increased circuit function in the latter. All three general population groups also showed LIMK1 haplotype-related differences in intraparietal sulcus functional connectivity localized to the fusiform gyrus, a visual processing region also identified in the Williams syndrome-typically developing comparison. These results suggest a neurogenetic mechanism, in part involving LIMK1, that may bias neural circuit function in both the general population and individuals with Williams syndrome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31687737
pii: 5612981
doi: 10.1093/brain/awz323
pmc: PMC6906590
doi:
Substances chimiques
LIMK1 protein, human
EC 2.7.11.1
Lim Kinases
EC 2.7.11.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3963-3974Subventions
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : ZIA MH002863
Pays : United States
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : ZIA MH002942
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R37 HD029957
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS035102
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : RC2 MH089983
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : RC2 MH089924
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain 2019. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.
Références
Vision Res. 2001;41(10-11):1409-22
pubmed: 11322983
Cell. 1996 Jul 12;86(1):59-69
pubmed: 8689688
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:544-53
pubmed: 23921101
J Clin Invest. 1955 Jul;34(7, Part 1):1101-8
pubmed: 14392225
J Biol Chem. 2012 Dec 7;287(50):41720-31
pubmed: 23086941
Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 13;9:721
pubmed: 30271373
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2009 Jul;13(4):305-16
pubmed: 18722146
Dev Neuropsychol. 2003;23(1-2):269-90
pubmed: 12730028
J Neurosci. 2007 Oct 31;27(44):11960-5
pubmed: 17978036
Neuroimage. 2017 Jul 1;154:174-187
pubmed: 28302591
Neuron. 2011 Jun 9;70(5):863-85
pubmed: 21658581
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998 Feb;17(1):87-97
pubmed: 9617910
Brain Cogn. 2000 Dec;44(3):604-28
pubmed: 11104544
Prog Brain Res. 2011;189:261-83
pubmed: 21489394
Hum Mol Genet. 2006 May 15;15(10):1722-34
pubmed: 16611674
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 May;7(5):380-93
pubmed: 16760918
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Apr 25;114(17):E3370-E3371
pubmed: 28420798
Am J Med Genet A. 2003 Nov 15;123A(1):45-59
pubmed: 14556246
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jan;61(1):40-9
pubmed: 18038337
Mol Neurobiol. 2019 May;56(5):3313-3325
pubmed: 30120731
Brain Connect. 2015 Oct;5(8):461-75
pubmed: 25712025
Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 1;37(1):90-101
pubmed: 17560126
J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Jun 15;189(2):257-66
pubmed: 20346979
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 Sep;56(9):879-94
pubmed: 22044458
J Mol Med (Berl). 2007 Jun;85(6):555-68
pubmed: 17294230
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Jun;49(6):433-8
pubmed: 17518929
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Mar 13;280(1758):20130168
pubmed: 23486442
Neuron. 2004 Sep 2;43(5):623-31
pubmed: 15339645
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 24;7(1):6308
pubmed: 28740249
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2010 May 15;154C(2):229-48
pubmed: 20425784
J Neurosci. 1995 Apr;15(4):3215-30
pubmed: 7722658
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994 Apr;4(2):157-65
pubmed: 8038571
Neuron. 2002 Jul 3;35(1):121-33
pubmed: 12123613
PLoS Genet. 2009 Jun;5(6):e1000529
pubmed: 19543373
Transl Psychiatry. 2015 Aug 18;5:e622
pubmed: 26285132
Nat Protoc. 2010 Sep;5(9):1564-73
pubmed: 21085122
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Nov;20(11):2636-46
pubmed: 20154013
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2010 Nov 15;154C(4):427-31
pubmed: 20981771
Brain Connect. 2012;2(3):125-41
pubmed: 22642651
Comput Biomed Res. 1996 Jun;29(3):162-73
pubmed: 8812068
Dev Sci. 2016 Jul;19(4):686-95
pubmed: 27412230
Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R724-32
pubmed: 17714666
Cereb Cortex. 2008 Oct;18(10):2402-9
pubmed: 18308711
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Oct;6(5):630-8
pubmed: 20802091
Brain. 2012 Sep;135(Pt 9):2711-25
pubmed: 22791801
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):68-74
pubmed: 26432245
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Jan;17(1):26-49
pubmed: 23265839
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1420-8
pubmed: 21889994
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2033-44
pubmed: 20851191
Neuroimage. 2012 Mar;60(1):623-32
pubmed: 22233733
Neuroimage. 2004 Oct;23(2):724-38
pubmed: 15488422
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):431-8
pubmed: 21810475
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0134195
pubmed: 26207985
J Neurosci. 2005 Aug 24;25(34):7840-6
pubmed: 16120786
Nat Methods. 2013 Jan;10(1):5-6
pubmed: 23269371
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2142-54
pubmed: 22019881
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D746-52
pubmed: 26481351
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 18;104(38):15117-22
pubmed: 17827280
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2006 Dec;1(3):175-82
pubmed: 18985104
Cereb Cortex. 1991 Sep-Oct;1(5):426-32
pubmed: 1822750
Behav Genet. 2011 May;41(3):394-402
pubmed: 21153484
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(5):679-85
pubmed: 16216290
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Nov;65(5):1222-9
pubmed: 10521286
Brain Res. 2009 Mar 3;1258:96-107
pubmed: 19118537
Ann Hum Genet. 2018 Nov;82(6):469-476
pubmed: 30155880
Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Nov;73(5):1162-9
pubmed: 14574645