Comparing the Impact of an Implicit Learning Approach With Standard Care on Recovery of Mobility Following Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

attention learning rehabilitation stroke

Journal

JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Nov 2019
Historique:
received: 01 04 2019
accepted: 16 07 2019
revised: 17 06 2019
entrez: 6 11 2019
pubmed: 7 11 2019
medline: 7 11 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although implicit and explicit learning approaches have been well investigated in healthy populations, there is less evidence regarding the relative benefits of each approach in clinical practice. Studies in stroke typically investigate single elements of an implicit learning approach (ILA; eg, reduced quantity feedback or an external focus of attention) within controlled environments. These studies predominantly evaluate performance, with few measuring this over time (ie, learning). The relevance and transferability of current research evidence into stroke rehabilitation is therefore limited. The objective of this study was to compare the ILA with standard care in the acute phase following stroke, to generate data and insights to inform the design of a definitive trial, and to understand patient and therapist perceptions of the ILA. This is a multicenter, assessor-blind, cluster randomized controlled pilot trial with nested qualitative evaluation. Stroke units (clusters) will be randomized to either ILA (intervention) or standard care (control) arms. Therapy teams at the intervention sites will be trained in the ILA and provided with an intervention manual. Those at the control sites will have minimal input from the research team, other than for data collection. Consent will be provided at the individual participant level. Once enrolled, participants will receive rehabilitation that focuses on lower limb recovery, using the designated approach. Measures will be taken at baseline, every 2 weeks until the point of discharge from hospital, and at 3 months post stroke onset. Measures include the Fugl Meyer Assessment (motor leg subsection), modified Rivermead Mobility Index, Swedish Postural Adjustment in Stroke Scale, and achievement of mobility milestones. Fidelity of the treatment approach will be monitored using observational video analysis. Focus groups and interviews will be used to gain insight into the perceptions of trial participants and clinical teams. The first site opened to recruitment in February 2019. The opening of a further 5 sites will be staggered throughout 2019. Results are expected in early 2021. The findings from this mixed methods pilot study will be used to inform the design of a definitive study, comparing the ILA with standard care in acute stroke rehabilitation. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03792126; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03792126. DERR1-10.2196/14222.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Although implicit and explicit learning approaches have been well investigated in healthy populations, there is less evidence regarding the relative benefits of each approach in clinical practice. Studies in stroke typically investigate single elements of an implicit learning approach (ILA; eg, reduced quantity feedback or an external focus of attention) within controlled environments. These studies predominantly evaluate performance, with few measuring this over time (ie, learning). The relevance and transferability of current research evidence into stroke rehabilitation is therefore limited.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to compare the ILA with standard care in the acute phase following stroke, to generate data and insights to inform the design of a definitive trial, and to understand patient and therapist perceptions of the ILA.
METHODS METHODS
This is a multicenter, assessor-blind, cluster randomized controlled pilot trial with nested qualitative evaluation. Stroke units (clusters) will be randomized to either ILA (intervention) or standard care (control) arms. Therapy teams at the intervention sites will be trained in the ILA and provided with an intervention manual. Those at the control sites will have minimal input from the research team, other than for data collection. Consent will be provided at the individual participant level. Once enrolled, participants will receive rehabilitation that focuses on lower limb recovery, using the designated approach. Measures will be taken at baseline, every 2 weeks until the point of discharge from hospital, and at 3 months post stroke onset. Measures include the Fugl Meyer Assessment (motor leg subsection), modified Rivermead Mobility Index, Swedish Postural Adjustment in Stroke Scale, and achievement of mobility milestones. Fidelity of the treatment approach will be monitored using observational video analysis. Focus groups and interviews will be used to gain insight into the perceptions of trial participants and clinical teams.
RESULTS RESULTS
The first site opened to recruitment in February 2019. The opening of a further 5 sites will be staggered throughout 2019. Results are expected in early 2021.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The findings from this mixed methods pilot study will be used to inform the design of a definitive study, comparing the ILA with standard care in acute stroke rehabilitation.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03792126; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03792126.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) UNASSIGNED
DERR1-10.2196/14222.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31687935
pii: v8i11e14222
doi: 10.2196/14222
pmc: PMC6864481
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03792126']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e14222

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : ICA-CL-2017-03-011
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

©Louise Johnson, Jane Burridge, Sara Demain, Sean Ewings. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 05.11.2019.

Références

Trials. 2013 Oct 25;14:353
pubmed: 24160371
Physiother Theory Pract. 2020 Jan;36(1):1-20
pubmed: 29920128
BMC Neurol. 2014 Jun 19;14:134
pubmed: 24946807
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
J Sports Sci. 2001 May;19(5):307-19
pubmed: 11354610
Physiother Res Int. 2015 Sep;20(3):166-73
pubmed: 25451759
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 16;11(12):e0166376
pubmed: 27992442
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2018 Jul 25;3(3):
pubmed: 33466969
J Mot Behav. 1998 Mar;30(1):51-9
pubmed: 20037020
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):848-855
pubmed: 28497929
J Sports Sci. 2006 Jan;24(1):89-99
pubmed: 16368617
Physiother Res Int. 2000;5(3):173-89
pubmed: 10998774
Clin Rehabil. 2014 Jul;28(7):632-6
pubmed: 24452700
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Feb;33(2):207-221
pubmed: 30168348
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Apr;62(597):e233-42
pubmed: 22520910
Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29
pubmed: 19460163
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006 Jun;30(2):46-57; discussion 58-9
pubmed: 16796767
Phys Ther. 2006 Mar;86(3):369-80
pubmed: 16506873
Disabil Rehabil. 2000 Dec 15;22(18):833-9
pubmed: 11197520
Physiotherapy. 2014 Jun;100(2):108-15
pubmed: 23796803
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 5;13(9):e0203591
pubmed: 30183763
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Sep;31(9):784-792
pubmed: 28934918
Physiother Res Int. 2009 Jun;14(2):77-90
pubmed: 19107706
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1998 Sep;69(3):224-30
pubmed: 9777659
Percept Mot Skills. 1996 Apr;82(2):507-14
pubmed: 8724923
Learn Mem. 2004 Jul-Aug;11(4):388-96
pubmed: 15286181
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 26;9(6):e100227
pubmed: 24968228
BMC Med. 2010 Oct 20;8:63
pubmed: 20961442
Am J Occup Ther. 2002 Jul-Aug;56(4):380-90
pubmed: 12125827
Stroke. 1988 May;19(5):604-7
pubmed: 3363593
Phys Ther. 2013 Jul;93(7):957-66
pubmed: 23559523
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 May 24;7(5):e142
pubmed: 29793902
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018 Jul;25(5):351-358
pubmed: 29609504
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31
pubmed: 1135616
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Feb;23(2):177-83
pubmed: 18987385
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Dec;8(4):648-60
pubmed: 11848583
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 21;10(8):e0135522
pubmed: 26296203
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Oct;98(10):1924-1931
pubmed: 28652064

Auteurs

Louise Johnson (L)

Stroke Unit, Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.

Jane Burridge (J)

University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Sara Demain (S)

University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.

Sean Ewings (S)

University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH