Precepting nurse practitioner students in the graduate nurse education demonstration: A cross-sectional analysis of the preceptor experience.


Journal

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
ISSN: 2327-6924
Titre abrégé: J Am Assoc Nurse Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101600770

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Historique:
entrez: 6 11 2019
pubmed: 7 11 2019
medline: 1 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Graduate Nurse Education (GNE) Demonstration seeks to increase the number of advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) in clinical practice. With the overall increase in APRN programs and, particularly, enrollment in nurse practitioner (NP) programs, there is growing competition among students to secure quality clinical precepting experiences. This study describes NPs' and physicians' experiences with precepting APRN students within the Greater Philadelphia GNE Consortium. This was a cross-sectional descriptive survey of 1,021 NP and physician preceptors who provided clinical practicum experiences for at least one of the nine Greater Philadelphia GNE Consortium schools. Differences between NP and physician precepting experiences regarding the importance of various factors in their decisions to precept were explored. Both NP and physician preceptors provide clinical practicum experiences to APRN students because they enjoy doing so. However, they differ regarding what they find important in their decisions to precept such as having protected time to precept and educational opportunities. As universities work to recruit quality preceptors, they should consider tailoring their approach based on the preceptor's clinical role. In addition, schools located within the same region should consider streamlining administrative processes to form sustaining and productive clinical partnerships.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The Graduate Nurse Education (GNE) Demonstration seeks to increase the number of advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) in clinical practice. With the overall increase in APRN programs and, particularly, enrollment in nurse practitioner (NP) programs, there is growing competition among students to secure quality clinical precepting experiences.
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
This study describes NPs' and physicians' experiences with precepting APRN students within the Greater Philadelphia GNE Consortium.
METHODS METHODS
This was a cross-sectional descriptive survey of 1,021 NP and physician preceptors who provided clinical practicum experiences for at least one of the nine Greater Philadelphia GNE Consortium schools.
RESULTS RESULTS
Differences between NP and physician precepting experiences regarding the importance of various factors in their decisions to precept were explored. Both NP and physician preceptors provide clinical practicum experiences to APRN students because they enjoy doing so. However, they differ regarding what they find important in their decisions to precept such as having protected time to precept and educational opportunities.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE CONCLUSIONS
As universities work to recruit quality preceptors, they should consider tailoring their approach based on the preceptor's clinical role. In addition, schools located within the same region should consider streamlining administrative processes to form sustaining and productive clinical partnerships.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31688505
doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000301
pii: 01741002-201911000-00007
pmc: PMC6996117
mid: NIHMS1067088
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

648-656

Subventions

Organisme : NINR NIH HHS
ID : T32 NR007104
Pays : United States

Références

N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 21;378(25):2360-2363
pubmed: 29924953
J Prof Nurs. 2014 May-Jun;30(3):273-8
pubmed: 24939338
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2017 Aug;29(8):484-491
pubmed: 28649770
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2015 Feb;27(2):66-71
pubmed: 25263385
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010 Nov;22(11):573-9
pubmed: 21054630
J Interprof Care. 2018 Mar;32(2):127-135
pubmed: 29172791
J Prof Nurs. 2017 Nov - Dec;33(6):422-428
pubmed: 29157570
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50(7):606-10
pubmed: 22354213
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2001 May;13(5):237-40
pubmed: 11930475

Auteurs

Barbara A Todd (BA)

Hospital University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Heather Brom (H)

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Elizabeth Blunt (E)

Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania.

Patricia Dillon (P)

LaSalle University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Caroline Doherty (C)

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Shirlee Drayton-Brooks (S)

Widener University, Chester, Pennsylvania.

Irene Hung (I)

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Kymberlee Montgomery (K)

Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Lynda Peoples (L)

Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Mary Powell (M)

Widener University, Chester, Pennsylvania.

Denise Vanacore (D)

Gwynedd Mercy University, Gwynedd Valley, Pennsylvania.

Dara Whalen (D)

College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey.

Linda Aiken (L)

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH