The impact of Clinical Nurse Specialists on the decision making process in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: A qualitative study.


Journal

European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society
ISSN: 1532-2122
Titre abrégé: Eur J Oncol Nurs
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 100885136

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Historique:
received: 19 03 2019
revised: 26 09 2019
accepted: 08 10 2019
pubmed: 7 11 2019
medline: 19 3 2020
entrez: 6 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There are well-documented barriers to nurse participation in cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings. This paper aims to identify the approaches used by Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNSs) in this setting to contribute during discussion, and to consider the impact of these approaches on the decision making process. In doing so it aims to highlight ways that CNSs can increase their influence, and enhance multidisciplinary engagement. This study is based on analysis of observation data from 122 MDT meetings in gynaecology, haematology and skin cancer MDTs. Field notes were reviewed, identifying 58 cases where CNSs contributed to MDT discussion. Audio recordings of the relevant sections were then transcribed and analysed thematically. Five approaches were used by CNSs to contribute in MDT meetings: sharing information, asking questions, providing practical suggestions, framing and using humour. These approaches influenced three key intermediary processes identified during the analysis ('successful contributions'): prompting discussion, influencing a treatment plan and facilitating teamwork. CNSs contributed successfully in cases where medical factors (such as relapsed disease or complex comorbidities) or non-medical factors (such as strong patient preference), had the potential to impact on the ability of teams to deliver treatment. CNSs have an important role in cancer MDT meetings. By focusing on a subset of cases where CNSs contributed during MDT discussion, this study has provided an insight into approaches that can be adopted by CNSs to increase their influence on the decision making process, enabling teams to capitalise on their knowledge and expertise in MDT meetings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31689677
pii: S1462-3889(19)30141-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.101674
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101674

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 09/2001/04
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Isla Wallace (I)

Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK. Electronic address: i.wallace@ucl.ac.uk.

Helen Barratt (H)

Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK. Electronic address: h.barratt@ucl.ac.uk.

Sarah Harvey (S)

UCL School of Management, University College London, Level 38, 1 Canada Square, London, E14 5AB, UK. Electronic address: sarah.r.harvey@ucl.ac.uk.

Rosalind Raine (R)

Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK. Electronic address: r.raine@ucl.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH