Loneliness and Life Satisfaction Explained by Public-Space Use and Mobility Patterns.
elderly
life satisfaction
loneliness
mobility
neighborhood
path analysis
public space
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 11 2019
04 11 2019
Historique:
received:
11
10
2019
revised:
30
10
2019
accepted:
02
11
2019
entrez:
7
11
2019
pubmed:
7
11
2019
medline:
24
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Previous research has shown that personal, neighborhood, and mobility characteristics could influence life satisfaction and loneliness of people and that exposure to public spaces, such as green spaces, may also affect the extent to which people feel lonely or satisfied with life. However, previous studies mainly focused on one of these effects, resulting in a lack of knowledge about the simultaneous effects of these characteristics on loneliness and life satisfaction. This study therefore aims to gain insights into how public-space use mediates the relations between personal, neighborhood, and mobility characteristics on the one hand and loneliness and life satisfaction on the other hand. Relationships were analyzed using a path analysis approach, based on a sample of 200 residents of three neighborhoods of the Dutch city 's-Hertogenbosch. The results showed that the influence of frequency of public-space use on life satisfaction and loneliness is limited. The effects of personal, neighborhood, and mobility characteristics on frequency of use of public space and on loneliness and life satisfaction were found to be significant. Age and activities of daily living (ADL) are significantly related to each other, and ADL was found to influence recreational and passive space use and loneliness and life satisfaction. Policymakers should, therefore, mainly focus on creating neighborhoods that are highly walkable and accessible, where green spaces and public-transport facilities are present, to promote physical activity among all residents.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31690000
pii: ijerph16214282
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214282
pmc: PMC6862387
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jun;64(12):2533-49
pubmed: 17433509
Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655-672
pubmed: 18504506
J Psychol. 2012 Jan-Apr;146(1-2):85-104
pubmed: 22303614
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Apr 02;12:46
pubmed: 25888885
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Sep;38(9):1682-91
pubmed: 16960531
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Jan-Feb;54(1):61-6
pubmed: 21514680
J Phys Act Health. 2006 Feb;3(s1):S99-S117
pubmed: 28834523
Int J Health Geogr. 2013 May 07;12:26
pubmed: 23648048
Psychol Bull. 1984 May;95(3):542-75
pubmed: 6399758
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5
pubmed: 16367493
Gerontologist. 2011 Apr;51(2):238-50
pubmed: 21097552
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jul;208:25-33
pubmed: 29758475
Gerontologist. 2012 Jun;52(3):357-66
pubmed: 21983126
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Jul-Aug;65:104-10
pubmed: 27017415
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 31;16(3):
pubmed: 30708985
Health Place. 2009 Jun;15(2):586-595
pubmed: 19022699
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1999 Oct;30(5):212-25
pubmed: 10568246
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Jul;60(7):587-92
pubmed: 16790830
J Behav Exp Econ. 2015 Feb;54:10-21
pubmed: 28713668
Appl Res Qual Life. 2014;9:505-516
pubmed: 25101145
Am J Public Health. 1994 Aug;84(8):1270-3
pubmed: 8059884