Comparison of the performance of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads among manufacturers.
Durata
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
Lead
Linox
Quattro
Journal
Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing
ISSN: 1572-8595
Titre abrégé: J Interv Card Electrophysiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9708966
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
06
08
2019
accepted:
30
09
2019
pubmed:
7
11
2019
medline:
19
8
2021
entrez:
7
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Leads are often considered the weakest link in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) systems, and lead dysfunction is a major concern for ICD recipients. The aim of this study was to compare the lead performance from three different manufacturers. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent ICD system implantation at Chiba University Hospital, Japan, between March 2008 and September 2017. The following leads were implanted in our center: Durata (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA, now Abbott) (n = 105), Linox and Linox A total of 297 ICD leads were analyzed. Failure rates for Durata, Linox/Linox In this single-center retrospective study, the performance of Sprint Quattro was lower than the performance of Linox/Linox
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Leads are often considered the weakest link in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) systems, and lead dysfunction is a major concern for ICD recipients. The aim of this study was to compare the lead performance from three different manufacturers.
METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent ICD system implantation at Chiba University Hospital, Japan, between March 2008 and September 2017. The following leads were implanted in our center: Durata (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA, now Abbott) (n = 105), Linox and Linox
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 297 ICD leads were analyzed. Failure rates for Durata, Linox/Linox
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In this single-center retrospective study, the performance of Sprint Quattro was lower than the performance of Linox/Linox
Identifiants
pubmed: 31691064
doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00640-w
pii: 10.1007/s10840-019-00640-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM