Patients, health professionals, and the health system: influencers on patients' participation in ward rounds.

education interview patient participation ward rounds

Journal

Patient preference and adherence
ISSN: 1177-889X
Titre abrégé: Patient Prefer Adherence
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101475748

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 03 04 2019
accepted: 13 07 2019
entrez: 7 11 2019
pubmed: 7 11 2019
medline: 7 11 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The ward round is an opportunity to plan and deliver patient-centered care. Benefits include an effective and safer clinician-patient relationship, patient empowerment, reduced anxiety and increased trust in the health care system. Factors contributing to patient involvement in ward rounds is shaped by their preferences, ability, and opportunity. To investigate ward rounds and the patient experience with them, the relationship between the patient and clinicians, and how rounds facilitate collaboration between them. A multimethod study was conducted in a single Australian facility in acute medicine and rehabilitation specialties. An observational study of ward rounds in each setting was conducted with 14 patients, aged between 55 and 89 years followed by semi-structured interviews conducted with the patients observed. Descriptive and thematic analysis was undertaken. One third of participants had not heard of the term ward round or could describe their purpose. Three main influencers on the patient experience of rounds were: self; the health system; and medical officers. No meaningful difference was found between patients in acute medicine and rehabilitation although all wanted to receive information from the senior medical officers. Patients more familiar with the health system were more active participants and took greater responsibility for their involvement in rounds and described higher satisfaction. There is a level of acceptance within the health system that patients understand what a ward round is. However, their role on the round is complex and this may only be developed through experiencing them. High system users teach themselves to navigate rounding processes to ensure their needs are met. To ensure equity in participation patients should be educated on ward rounds, what to expect and how to they can participate.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The ward round is an opportunity to plan and deliver patient-centered care. Benefits include an effective and safer clinician-patient relationship, patient empowerment, reduced anxiety and increased trust in the health care system. Factors contributing to patient involvement in ward rounds is shaped by their preferences, ability, and opportunity.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To investigate ward rounds and the patient experience with them, the relationship between the patient and clinicians, and how rounds facilitate collaboration between them.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
A multimethod study was conducted in a single Australian facility in acute medicine and rehabilitation specialties. An observational study of ward rounds in each setting was conducted with 14 patients, aged between 55 and 89 years followed by semi-structured interviews conducted with the patients observed. Descriptive and thematic analysis was undertaken.
RESULTS RESULTS
One third of participants had not heard of the term ward round or could describe their purpose. Three main influencers on the patient experience of rounds were: self; the health system; and medical officers. No meaningful difference was found between patients in acute medicine and rehabilitation although all wanted to receive information from the senior medical officers. Patients more familiar with the health system were more active participants and took greater responsibility for their involvement in rounds and described higher satisfaction.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
There is a level of acceptance within the health system that patients understand what a ward round is. However, their role on the round is complex and this may only be developed through experiencing them. High system users teach themselves to navigate rounding processes to ensure their needs are met. To ensure equity in participation patients should be educated on ward rounds, what to expect and how to they can participate.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31692552
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S211073
pii: 211073
pmc: PMC6710545
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1415-1429

Informations de copyright

© 2019 Walton et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Références

Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Aug;84(2):150-1
pubmed: 20884163
Emerg Med Australas. 2019 Jun;31(3):347-354
pubmed: 30126054
Psychol Health. 2010 Dec;25(10):1229-45
pubmed: 20204937
Scand J Caring Sci. 2014 Jun;28(2):297-304
pubmed: 23808650
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1215-26
pubmed: 23796047
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Nov;17(4):285-94
pubmed: 10606197
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016 May 9;29(4):364-79
pubmed: 27142947
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):921-928
pubmed: 26628552
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):15-23
pubmed: 29475980
BMC Geriatr. 2011 Aug 18;11:46
pubmed: 21851611
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Jan;16(1):e12454
pubmed: 24719703
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec;69(12):1805-12
pubmed: 19846245

Auteurs

Victoria Walton (V)

Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, Australian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, Australia.

Anne Hogden (A)

Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, Australian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, Australia.

Janet C Long (JC)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Julie K Johnson (JK)

Department of Surgery, Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

David Greenfield (D)

Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, Australian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, Australia.

Classifications MeSH