Utilization, effect, and benefit of the individualized Meeting Centers Support Program for people with dementia and caregivers.
Aged
Alzheimer Disease
/ psychology
Caregivers
/ education
Computer-Assisted Instruction
Day Care, Medical
/ organization & administration
Female
Group Processes
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neuropsychological Tests
Personal Autonomy
Quality of Life
/ psychology
Social Support
Surveys and Questionnaires
Utilization Review
DemenTalent
e-Learning
emotional burden caregivers
individualized support
neuropsychiatric symptoms
telephone coaching
Journal
Clinical interventions in aging
ISSN: 1178-1998
Titre abrégé: Clin Interv Aging
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101273480
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
19
04
2019
accepted:
04
07
2019
entrez:
7
11
2019
pubmed:
7
11
2019
medline:
12
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There are few interventions on an individual basis to support community-dwelling people with dementia to continue to fulfill their potential in society and to support their informal caregivers via e-Health. This study explored the effectiveness of the individualized Meeting Centers Support Program (iMCSP) consisting of DemenTalent (people with dementia work as volunteers in a society based on their talents), Dementelcoach (telephone coaching), and STAR e-Learning for caregivers, compared to regular MCSP and No day care support. An explorative randomized controlled trial with pre/post measurements (M0-M6) and two groups (iMCSP and regular MCSP). In addition, a comparison was made between iMCSP and a reference No day care control group. Standardized questionnaires were administered on self-esteem, neuropsychiatric symptoms, experienced autonomy and quality of life of the person with dementia, and on caregiver's sense of competence, quality of life, and happiness. The iMCSP interventions resulted in a broader group of participants utilizing the Meeting Centers. Compared to regular MCSP, DemenTalent had a moderate positive effect on neuropsychiatric symptoms, which also proved less severe. Positive affect of participants improved within the DemenTalent and regular MCSP group after six months. Caregivers of DemenTalent participants experienced less emotional impact of neuropsychiatric symptoms. No differences were found in experienced burden, sense of competence, or quality of life in caregivers using iMCSP or regular MCSP. Compared to those receiving No day care support, caregivers of DemenTalent participants and caregivers using Dementelcoach or STAR e-Learning proved happier. Post-hoc analyses, accounting for potential between-group differences in outcome measures at baseline, generally showed results in the same direction. People with dementia and caregivers highly appreciated iMCSP and regular MCSP. iMCSP can be effectively applied as alternative or additional support via regular Meeting Centers for people with dementia and caregivers who prefer individualized activities/support. DemenTalent decreased the severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms of people with dementia and emotional burden of caregivers. All iMCSP interventions tended to result in caregivers being happier compared to those receiving no support. Larger-scale studies are needed to investigate the effect of iMCSP on other domains of quality of life of participants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31692559
doi: 10.2147/CIA.S212852
pii: 212852
pmc: PMC6717152
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1527-1553Informations de copyright
© 2019 Dröes et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;31(2):195-203
pubmed: 26077904
Gerontologist. 2018 Jan 18;58(suppl_1):S88-S102
pubmed: 29361069
Br J Psychiatry. 2000 May;176:444-52
pubmed: 10912220
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;19(7):673-84
pubmed: 15254924
Int Psychogeriatr. 2009 Oct;21(5):949-65
pubmed: 19602305
Ageing Res Rev. 2014 May;15:76-93
pubmed: 24675045
Aging Ment Health. 2008 Jan;12(1):14-29
pubmed: 18297476
Gerontologist. 2018 Jan 18;58(suppl_1):S10-S19
pubmed: 29361064
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Jan;21(1):4-17
pubmed: 27869503
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Apr;28(4):631-45
pubmed: 26639631
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;33(7):883-892
pubmed: 29513909
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Jul;26(7):1083-98
pubmed: 24565226
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;18(10):928-39
pubmed: 20808145
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2003 Apr;34(2):74-7
pubmed: 12741091
Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(3):378-90
pubmed: 22250961
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017 Aug 10;19(9):64
pubmed: 28795386
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2002 Sep;33(4):150-5
pubmed: 12378786
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Mar;31(3):351-362
pubmed: 30017013
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005 Mar;60(3):368-74
pubmed: 15860476
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1996 Apr;27(2):54-61
pubmed: 8669072
Expert Rev Neurother. 2011 Dec;11(12):1769-81; quiz 1782
pubmed: 22091600
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Aug;24(8):1316-1325
pubmed: 31119946
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Feb;24(2):280-290
pubmed: 30520312
Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2308-14
pubmed: 7991117
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Oct;31(10):1433-1445
pubmed: 31455455
Int Psychogeriatr. 2000 Mar;12(1):99-115
pubmed: 10798457
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Feb;47(2):256-7
pubmed: 9988301
Aging Ment Health. 2004 May;8(3):201-11
pubmed: 15203401
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Feb;24(2):212-22
pubmed: 21995966
BMC Geriatr. 2016 May 18;16:106
pubmed: 27193287
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 30;17(10):e241
pubmed: 26519106
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Nov;66(11):2120-2127
pubmed: 30298901
Am J Psychiatry. 1982 Sep;139(9):1136-9
pubmed: 7114305
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Sep;62(9):1002-9
pubmed: 17895439
Gerontologist. 1999 Feb;39(1):25-35
pubmed: 10028768
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Jan;25(1):149-159
pubmed: 31684754